Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
safariguy5 wrote:QOTD:
Dr. Zoidberg: Now Fry, it's been a few years since medical school, so remind me. Disemboweling in your species: fatal or non-fatal?
Fry: Fatal.
Dr. Zoidberg: [hands Bender a wad of dollar bills] Large bet on myself in round one.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
kwanton wrote:Actually I've only had enough experience playing with one of those people to be confident enough to use metagame and that's freezie. My reads on everyone including freezie were based completely on how they've acted this game and not on how they've been acting previous games.
Obviously I don't have any reads on sax's play because of the inactivity. However, drunk monkey's pressuring of haggis for being reluctant to reveal his role details doesn't sit right with me. If there is an important power role (haggis said he was important late game) then I want them to shut up unless they are close to being lynched. No reason to give mafia free info unless we have to. Granted, drunk wasn't exactly pushing for haggis to claim but he was pointing a finger at him for not giving info out freely. That's why I've only FOS'd drunk so far and labeled him as only slightly leaning scum.
I want them to shut up unless they are close to being lynched.
jonty125 wrote:Confirm.
vote Gilligan; for his vote on TSL (now drunk) after Haggis claimed he was a townie (possible masonry or lover mechanism?) also for seeming not too care too much about skimming (saying I read 95% of it that should be acceptable).
jonty125 wrote:vote Gilligan; for his vote on TSL (now drunk) after Haggis claimed he was a townie (possible masonry or lover mechanism?)
also for seeming not too care too much about skimming (saying I read 95% of it that should be acceptable).
AndyDufresne wrote:jonty125 wrote:Confirm.
vote Gilligan; for his vote on TSL (now drunk) after Haggis claimed he was a townie (possible masonry or lover mechanism?) also for seeming not too care too much about skimming (saying I read 95% of it that should be acceptable).
This just seems like a rehash of someone else's post from a few pages ago.
--Andy
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:jonty125 wrote:Confirm.
vote Gilligan; for his vote on TSL (now drunk) after Haggis claimed he was a townie (possible masonry or lover mechanism?) also for seeming not too care too much about skimming (saying I read 95% of it that should be acceptable).
This just seems like a rehash of someone else's post from a few pages ago.
--Andy
That's kind of the natural scenario considering that's really all there is to the gilligan bandwagon. I do find the timing interesting considering at least in my opinion the naxus and freezie cases are stronger.
safariguy5 wrote:The scope of the game will encompass all seasons.
kwanton wrote:safariguy5 wrote:The scope of the game will encompass all seasons.
Mod, need clarification if you can reveal the info.
Does all seasons mean the movies too?
I just had a thought...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:I was personally hoping to have heard naxus' response before I made my final decision on the vote as I was and am willing to pursue the freezie case as well if the opportunity seemed right for it.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
strike wolf wrote:As far as Jonty...I can kind of understand tthe argument going over ones head defense (it can be related to the noob defense but is a bit different) so I don't have any problem with that response. I would recommend though if you do feel this way that a second read and if you still don't get it asking for clarification.
jonty125 wrote:strike wolf wrote:As far as Jonty...I can kind of understand tthe argument going over ones head defense (it can be related to the noob defense but is a bit different) so I don't have any problem with that response. I would recommend though if you do feel this way that a second read and if you still don't get it asking for clarification.
I understand the cases it just as I metioned the term 'Mafia Godfather' sprung to mind when Gil said he wanted to be invstiagted but not killed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users