Moderator: Community Team
safariguy5 wrote:Let me ask you a hypothetical question. What if I agree and don't follow through? Tomorrow the HoTK is going to out himself and say "hey, safari didn't send me two actions, let's lynch him." Here's the thing with making deals, I don't necessarily have to abide by them. At this point in the game, the HoTK and Cersi are too valuable to their respective sides to out themselves to kill 1 little third party survivor. So I could technically agree to anything, and what would town do if I don't follow through on it?
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
strike wolf wrote:unvote vote safari
I do not do this because of Haggis' or Bleed's reasonings but because as I originally stated my fear at the beginning may have been that this was just an attempt to try to get the HotK or the king himself to claim prematurely and Safari seems to be calling for the HoTK to claim. Also I'm finding a lot of discrepancies in Safari's posts where he switches back and forth where he has to send one action to the HOTking, one to the Godfather and keep one to himself and posts where he seems to be saying that is not the case.
Talapus wrote:What I hate about this whole situation saf is that you seem to be blatantly telling all of us right now that regardless, you'll do things your way, keep the most choice info to yourself, and you flipflop on who it is that gets info when you discuss it with us. Statistically speaking,you should side with us right now because we are the majority in the game as town must vastly outnumber scum. Yet time and again you make it obvious you are going to do whats best for you regardless even though town is winning currently. That makes no sense. I don't think Haggis had a bad plan but to go and say what you did here:safariguy5 wrote:Let me ask you a hypothetical question. What if I agree and don't follow through? Tomorrow the HoTK is going to out himself and say "hey, safari didn't send me two actions, let's lynch him." Here's the thing with making deals, I don't necessarily have to abide by them. At this point in the game, the HoTK and Cersi are too valuable to their respective sides to out themselves to kill 1 little third party survivor. So I could technically agree to anything, and what would town do if I don't follow through on it?
Well, I don't think it's hypothetical at all. You've made it apparent you are going to do it your way regardless of what we say and with the info you keep the potential for screwing us is huge. I voted because I think the cons outweigh the pros on your ability for town in the long run. The vote on you will stay though because your general attitude about your ability to town is frieghtening. Regardless of what town or scum say you are obviously in this for yourself.
/ wrote:Sorry I haven't been very active, I agree, like I said previously, info scum gets from an outside source is bad since it reinforces potential fake claims for them, and he must give them decent info since they can pick him off whenever. The way safari has been acting it seems like he perceives town as the greater threat even though he is unable to see at this point who is on any given side. I discussed my take on probability and so forth on page 8, so now with the deadline in place and it being day one, I feel it is the best time to avoid error.
Unvote vote safariguy
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Humh. Sorry Saf, wish things had turned out a bit better for you here. I guess I would have played my cards differently if I was in your place and waited a day to claim. Even still, this shouldn't have happened like this and it is an absolute waste of a day.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:How is this like bleed vs. Rodion?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Safariguy, your role is just too unpredictable. Your information gathering means that if we let you live now, you could potentially out all of our power roles if the mafia start winning. At any point later on, you could tell who has investigative abilities, killing abilities, and all manner of things. Granted, you could turn on scum as well, but right now we can't anticipate that. We have no idea where the next few kills are going to go to.
Had you just kept your mouth shut for a few days, then you could've gathered up enough information to blackmail your way to an easy victory. Your role is very powerful, but you doomed yourself by letting us know so early.
vote safariguy
safariguy5 wrote:Is it blackmail? Probably. But as Rodion so eloquently put it in Clue...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMk5sMHj58I
safariguy5 wrote:I'd rather die than see town try and coerce me to help them.
Rodion wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Is it blackmail? Probably. But as Rodion so eloquently put it in Clue...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMk5sMHj58Isafariguy5 wrote:I'd rather die than see town try and coerce me to help them.
I'm giving you one last chance to "play to win the game". You can take Haggis' "meta-promise" as a fair compromise: you'll basically be putting your whole mafia reputation on the line. If you agree to his terms (which are smoother than my original ones), fine. The fact that a lie would mean we'd never trust you again on any sort of gambit should be enough to generate trust.
If you'd rather die, let me know: I'm ready to hammer.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
safariguy5 wrote:Rodion wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Is it blackmail? Probably. But as Rodion so eloquently put it in Clue...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMk5sMHj58Isafariguy5 wrote:I'd rather die than see town try and coerce me to help them.
I'm giving you one last chance to "play to win the game". You can take Haggis' "meta-promise" as a fair compromise: you'll basically be putting your whole mafia reputation on the line. If you agree to his terms (which are smoother than my original ones), fine. The fact that a lie would mean we'd never trust you again on any sort of gambit should be enough to generate trust.
If you'd rather die, let me know: I'm ready to hammer.
I request Doc protection tonight, in exchange for 2 night actions to HoTK. Will negotiate on a night by night basis, no deals throughout the game.
pancakemix wrote:Meh. Pointless lynch is still pointless. I will have no part in it. I'd just like to state for the record that my problems with this stem not from probabilities but from the fact that we know for certain we're no lynching mafia.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Rodion wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Rodion wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Is it blackmail? Probably. But as Rodion so eloquently put it in Clue...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMk5sMHj58Isafariguy5 wrote:I'd rather die than see town try and coerce me to help them.
I'm giving you one last chance to "play to win the game". You can take Haggis' "meta-promise" as a fair compromise: you'll basically be putting your whole mafia reputation on the line. If you agree to his terms (which are smoother than my original ones), fine. The fact that a lie would mean we'd never trust you again on any sort of gambit should be enough to generate trust.
If you'd rather die, let me know: I'm ready to hammer.
I request Doc protection tonight, in exchange for 2 night actions to HoTK. Will negotiate on a night by night basis, no deals throughout the game.
The problem of a night by night negotiation is that once you make it to D2 you can effectively blackmail us. If we sign on the dotted line we will get help for one night, but will have to face the consequences for the remainder of the game. I'd rather pressure you to commit to a longterm deal.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:I'm honestly saddened by how paranoid the people in this game are.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users