Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I get two votes! yay!Commander9 wrote:This.jeraado wrote:That would be a mighty waste of a lynch. If you know he's not coming back, then voting for the inactive is basically no different to voting for a no-lynch.
Let the mod deal with it - he can decide whether to try for a replacement or modkill
Vote count:
Shield (1) - Edoc,
Safari (1) - naxus
Edoc (1) - target
Nag (1) - Campin, Shaggy
campin (4) - Shaggy, Shield, target, freezie
AoG (3) - AoG, Sax, Sheep
Yoshi (1) - PCM
blake (1) - Karel
target (1) - jeraado
streaker (2) - freezie, shield
freezie (1) - vioiet
shaggy (1) - Iliad,
With 25 alive, it takes 13 to lynch. Deadline is May 5th. (I may consider extending if this activity level will continue)
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
safariguy5 wrote:Here's the problem with votehopping. If we were in the joke vote stage, vote hopping is probably ok. But since you seem to have firmly established that we are out of the joke vote stage through your accusation of nagerous, changing your vote excessively is seen as scummy because it looks like you're trying to push for a lynch while staying under the radar. When changing votes, it's necessary to provide some sort of reason, and I really think this voting of nagerous is sort of ridiculous. Correct me if I'm wrong but he wasn't the one who came dangerously close to hammering. And I still think that some players have acted more scummy than that one little vote. Nag might have skimmed the thread and didn't realize that shaggy was already under pressure, but he wasn't the one who almost hammered him.


Perhaps this is the loose link. I am assuming the Mafia cannot talk during the day by PM, so it would be a good chance for them to tell one of their own to back off a bit. Im going to Metagame here, but he played exactly the same way in TeamCC Mafia and turned out to be Mafia Godfather...freezie wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Here's the problem with votehopping. If we were in the joke vote stage, vote hopping is probably ok. But since you seem to have firmly established that we are out of the joke vote stage through your accusation of nagerous, changing your vote excessively is seen as scummy because it looks like you're trying to push for a lynch while staying under the radar. When changing votes, it's necessary to provide some sort of reason, and I really think this voting of nagerous is sort of ridiculous. Correct me if I'm wrong but he wasn't the one who came dangerously close to hammering. And I still think that some players have acted more scummy than that one little vote. Nag might have skimmed the thread and didn't realize that shaggy was already under pressure, but he wasn't the one who almost hammered him.
^^^^
This. Absolutly. Shield, I have defended you earlier, but, I think enough posts has been made for you to see the light. Let me add my grain of salt: You're overly agressive. Trust me, even if it's well intentioned, it can screw the town ( personal experienced...I got 2 town power roles to claim cause I was way agressive in a past game..)
Calm down, look over all the posts and try to find a loose link. Even if I still have problems doing that...
It was a single vote, albeit totally random. Your play is starting to tork me off. I've given you plenty of advice to get you started. My final piece of advice is to read old mafia threads and figure out how people play. Replays are a fantastic tool to learn from. You've gotten a ton of advice. The kid gloves are off now. If you look any more scummy to me I'm not going to hold back. I feel that, for the most part, distracting people with random joke votes or spam doesn't really work all to well. All it does is waste the time of the people who are posting and a fraction of that time for the people who are reading. If it's really bad spam then modkill/replace that player and move on. I think you have a very weak reason to vote naggy. I agree with saxlad, vote shield. FoS Freezieshieldgenerator7 wrote:nagerous wrote:Forgot colour but screw it as it was a joke.this is a completely joking vote after the joke-vote stage is over. It may be a scum tactic in trying to prolong the joke vote stage and keeping town from making a decisive lynch. And plus it's just a distraction. I am going to UNvote Vote nagerous until he explains why he joke voted after the joke vote stage was completely over with.nagerous wrote:Vote Shaggy I saw him bangin' on the sofa.
It's a bus made out of foam. If it runs you over you can get up, figure out what you did wrong, and join another game. It isn't just newbs this happens to. You need to figure out how to respond. Part of that is knowing what you should avoid saying.targetman377 wrote:See this is my problem i have with mafia games. As a newbie i say comments cause you all want me to talk. then you throw me under the bus. that's just how i feel. Sorry if that is perceived as scummy.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

when during the joke stage he was very active. but when a trial of people voted. (even being a joke vote) But now he has not contributed much to the conversation and seems to be lying low! This is just my impression i am getting. Is I think he did not think he would attract so much attention that when he did he decided to lay low and let it pass. Know that people would bring up casses against other people. Makeing him and his action be forgotten.Army of GOD wrote:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING JOKE-VOTING!!!!!!!!!!!
vote AoG
I realize that you are trying, but you are taking the small things, and the jokes too seriously. The critical difference that has to be learned (and that I had to learn as well) is the difference between a joke or noobiness and scum.targetman377 wrote:Ok, I have made up my mind! I am going to vote AOG. for a couple reasons
A. He voted for me before the game started(I know its week case but that's just one of my cases)
B.This is his last post that he madewhen during the joke stage he was very active. but when a trial of people voted. (even being a joke vote) But now he has not contributed much to the conversation and seems to be lying low! This is just my impression i am getting. Is I think he did not think he would attract so much attention that when he did he decided to lay low and let it pass. Know that people would bring up casses against other people. Makeing him and his action be forgotten.Army of GOD wrote:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING JOKE-VOTING!!!!!!!!!!!
vote AoG
C. he has not even unvoted at this stage when most people have retracted there joke votes.
VOTE: AOG
While you are correct about the jokevoting, AoG is lying low. Target, this is the best case you have presented all game. At the very worst, some votes on AoG should spur him to activity. vote Army of GODblakebowling wrote:I realize that you are trying, but you are taking the small things, and the jokes too seriously. The critical difference that has to be learned (and that I had to learn as well) is the difference between a joke or noobiness and scum.targetman377 wrote:Ok, I have made up my mind! I am going to vote AOG. for a couple reasons
A. He voted for me before the game started(I know its week case but that's just one of my cases)
B.This is his last post that he madewhen during the joke stage he was very active. but when a trial of people voted. (even being a joke vote) But now he has not contributed much to the conversation and seems to be lying low! This is just my impression i am getting. Is I think he did not think he would attract so much attention that when he did he decided to lay low and let it pass. Know that people would bring up casses against other people. Makeing him and his action be forgotten.Army of GOD wrote:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING JOKE-VOTING!!!!!!!!!!!
vote AoG
C. he has not even unvoted at this stage when most people have retracted there joke votes.
VOTE: AOG

My reason for voting for AOG has nothing to do with the joke post. I don't really care about that! it moth re the fact he has disappeared from the conversation and is laying low.blakebowling wrote:I realize that you are trying, but you are taking the small things, and the jokes too seriously. The critical difference that has to be learned (and that I had to learn as well) is the difference between a joke or noobiness and scum.targetman377 wrote:Ok, I have made up my mind! I am going to vote AOG. for a couple reasons
A. He voted for me before the game started(I know its week case but that's just one of my cases)
B.This is his last post that he madewhen during the joke stage he was very active. but when a trial of people voted. (even being a joke vote) But now he has not contributed much to the conversation and seems to be lying low! This is just my impression i am getting. Is I think he did not think he would attract so much attention that when he did he decided to lay low and let it pass. Know that people would bring up casses against other people. Makeing him and his action be forgotten.Army of GOD wrote:ENOUGH WITH THE FUCKING JOKE-VOTING!!!!!!!!!!!
vote AoG
C. he has not even unvoted at this stage when most people have retracted there joke votes.
VOTE: AOG
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Really?shieldgenerator7 wrote:yes, targetman, that is exactly why I initially voted for him.
Unvote Vote AoG
Cause that's a straight blatant lie. If you do want to learn and get better shield, learn the phrase Lynch All Liars. If someone is caught in a lie, it's almost always because they are anti-town and were trying to cover their tracks.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Vote AoG for voting before the day scene
hey, first time I've used color!
Can we PLEASE hang him for this, PLEASE.Iliad wrote:Really?shieldgenerator7 wrote:yes, targetman, that is exactly why I initially voted for him.
Unvote Vote AoGCause that's a straight blatant lie. If you do want to learn and get better shield, learn the phrase Lynch All Liars. If someone is caught in a lie, it's almost always because they are anti-town and were trying to cover their tracks.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Vote AoG for voting before the day scene
hey, first time I've used color!
It's quite likely that you thought the bandwagon was a fairly good one and wanted to hop on. No need to lie though. Re- wagon: this is a big game and the thing I have found with large games is we do have to have everyone talking otherwise it's really hard to have discussion or reach a lynch.
Anyway shield, you've still earned my vote for that. If you are learning than show it, for one you haven't really made much input today only hopping on wagons.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.