CC's 10 BEST PLAYERS IN THEIR 20's

by **Fircoal** on Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:45 pm

I may only be 17 but surely my score of 19588 is good enough to transcend that problem, and put me on this list.

by **Bones2484** on Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:51 pm

jrh_cardinal wrote:
Robinette wrote:it is very hard to fathom someone in their teens being good enough to be on this short list...

ljex (he may be 20 now, idk)

Buzz Killington is, in fact, 47.

by **InkL0sed** on Mon Nov 01, 2010 12:06 am

Fircoal wrote:I may only be 17 but surely my score of 19588 is good enough to transcend that problem, and put me on this list.

You're not 14 anymore??!?

by **Robinette** on Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:01 pm

InkL0sed wrote:I can read. I don't see how being smarter than him isn't good enough.

However, as I said before, I think your lack of understanding of logical arguments means you are non bonus satis.

by **the.killing.44** on Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:05 pm

jrh_cardinal wrote:
Robinette wrote:it is very hard to fathom someone in their teens being good enough to be on this short list...

ljex (he may be 20 now, idk)

A herp-a-derp o' burnin' darp.

by **ljex** on Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:18 pm

jrh_cardinal wrote:
Robinette wrote:it is very hard to fathom someone in their teens being good enough to be on this short list...

ljex (he may be 20 now, idk)

I really hope this was because I have said like 5 times this thread is about peoples win percentage not age.

by **Commander62890** on Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:26 pm

He wasn't joking. Nice to know you're highly regarded, though, eh Buzz Killington?

by **Robinette** on Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:24 pm

I believe we can conclude that the intelligent 20 somethings at CC are, in fact, some of the biggest LOSERS here...

by **Pirlo** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:27 pm

I enjoyed posting in cc's stupidest things but some mod locked it so i have to try here... exactly like my real life, i find dictators everywhere i try to criticize something stupid.......
1st of all,,, there's no flaming war...
2nd i just have a problem with some term "DISCRETION" and i'm looking for some definitions...
are you gonna lock any forum in which post, or i'll eventually earn a long vacation? maybe permanent? who cares...
anyway, I'm not here for flaming,, if you interpret my criticism as flaming, then we got another DISCRETION dilemma here..

I've been always criticizing the DISCRETION thing since it is a major problem in and finally, i was abused due to a wrong DISCRETION.....
some mod used her DISCRETION to accuse me of bigotry, so she reported me to another mod to ban me... now the other mod is/was sure i'm not a bigot, not in that way at least, but the mod who issued my official ban didn't use her DISCRETION to make a verification.....

see what I mean? again this is NOT flaming...

I'm just criticizing something i didn't like... aren't we free to express our opinion here?

remember people,,,, I consider DISCRETION one of the stupidest things not smartest things, but unfortunately, NAZI mods locked that forum so i came here to talk to smart people as their forum looks like harder to lock

by **InsomniaRed** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:43 pm

I wouldn't test the forum mods Pirlo, it seems you've moved from annoying Live Chat to annoying the forums, but if you want to enjoy all aspects of the site, I suggest not pushing your luck...

by **clapper011** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:47 pm

pirlo, you have been asked to open up an eticket if you feel you were wronged. We did discuss this in private, but now you have chose to bring it to the public eye. However you are not following the forum guidelines by bringing this thread off topic. and I am sure that the other members who are on topic in this thread do not appreciate you doing this. So please do not bring threads off topic with your anger towards myself and other moderators. I will not lock this thread as it is not the fault of the OP. The other thread was locked for other reasons NOT just your posts(however they did not help). If you wish to discuss this matter further then feel free to pm myself or Andy or open up an eticket. Thank you. And sorry Robinette and others of this thread for this interruption.....

now back on topic.. there are a few 20 somethings on this site that are very intelligent!

by **Commander62890** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:52 pm

Pirlo wrote:I enjoyed posting in cc's stupidest things but some mod locked it so i have to try here

wow, you thought that other thread was about "CC's stupidest things?" Get a clue, and try reading the first post once in awhile.
your posts were totally off-topic in that thread, just as they are off-topic in this one
please start your own thread or stop bitching

edit: Clapper covered it... E-Ticket is good

by **Leehar** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:53 pm

I think the main thing you're missing Pirlo, is that you were going off-topic in both that thread and this one. This topic is mainly for the discussion of those members in the top 250 on the scoreboard, who's winning percentage is in the 20's, and I'm not really sure what the other thread was about, but i think there was sufficient reason to lock them.
Now if you do want to continue on your rants, then feel free to set up an appropriate topic on 'Down with the establishment' and such verbiage, I won't really like it's chances of staying up, but if you're able to chair a civilized discussion on a topic that hasn't been discussed before, then I'm sure you're free to go ahead and try.

Edit: Lol, I'm too slow in posting. So anyway, to continue with the topic, I submitted a few names on the first page rob, have you looked at them?
Also, are you comfortable going on the assumption that there's a direct correlation between intelligence, a low winning percentage, and a high score. I'm sure we can assume they are good risk players, but I think saying that the iq is similarly high may be stretching the mark a bit

(Edit2: And also, sorry for being a bit harsh on you I guess, I didn't really know you were unfamiliar with the forums, which I now know with your suggs forum post)

by **Pirlo** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:51 pm

Are you gonna make another amazing report???

I'm not testing, flaming or annoying. I just have a problem with a term and looking for answer.. I know how to be annoying WITHIN your rules if I want to do.... but I DON'T

by **Pirlo** on Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:55 pm

OK SORRY EVERYBODY, I'll learn how to open my own threads later....

SORRY AGAIN FOR ANY UNINTENDED INTERRUPTION...

cheeers

by **Robinette** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:15 am

Leehar wrote:So anyway, to continue with the topic, I submitted a few names on the first page rob, have you looked at them?

yes yes,,, top of page 5 you'll find a revised list where i added blockhead,, but not the other name you mentioned...

Leehar wrote:Also, are you comfortable going on the assumption that there's a direct correlation between intelligence, a low winning percentage, and a high score. I'm sure we can assume they are good risk players, but I think saying that the iq is similarly high may be stretching the mark a bit

Geniuses,,, each and every one!

by **TheBro** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 1:56 am

I'm 19, but I'm currently learning how to do this:

My score ain't terribad, I can be pricky, and I love attention. I really think I should make the cut.

by **Leehar** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 3:38 am

Robinette wrote:
Leehar wrote:So anyway, to continue with the topic, I submitted a few names on the first page rob, have you looked at them?

yes yes,,, top of page 5 you'll find a revised list where i added blockhead,, but not the other name you mentioned...

Outside the top 250 I guess.
But here's 2 new geniuses for the list.
129 roprotem 2808 2004 483 (24%)
237 Serpentor 2604 570 139 (24%)

TheBro wrote:I'm 19, but I'm currently learning how to do this:
My score ain't terribad, I can be pricky, and I love attention. I really think I should make the cut.

Actually, you're a quite ancient 71. I don't know how you're still around.

by **FarangDemon** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 3:54 am

Interesting thread.

Though I love me a good Circus Maximus escalating along with my morning cup of ass-doodling, it's predominantly team games for me, so I'll probably stay in my upper 40's.

(ass-doodling means "Doodle Earth Assassin" with 8 players)

by **Robinette** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:55 am

you know,,, i'm just 28, but i must be even nicer than i am intelligent...

Why?

Well, there have been many opportunities to tell posters that if they moved from here over to that other '20 something' thread, THAT IT WOULD RAISE THE AVERAGE IQ OF BOTH THREADS... Bahahahahaaa...

But you see,,, I am just TOOoooooooooooo NICE to say any such things... O:)

by **Leehar** on Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:16 pm

Except you just said it:P.
And don't act like it wasn't your intention to deceive everyone who came along when you decided to name this thread.
At least there's the power of the edit function to increase your intelligence with hindsight.

by **Robinette** on Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:20 am

Leehar wrote:Except you just said it

well sure, but i was just making a point that i'm too nice to actually say that it would be easy to make fun of people here, and that i myself would never actually say anything like that... no no, not me, you see... like i said... i'm too nice for that...

Leehar wrote:And don't act like it wasn't your intention to deceive everyone who came along when you decided to name this thread.

What do you mean? You're not being very nice you know... and if i wasn't so nice i might say something mean like you just did... but I am simply to nice to point out how rude and selfish you are being, so i'll just have to hope that someones throws a blanket over you and pounds on your head,,, but it won't be me, because i'm too nice for that....

Anyway, back on topic...

Upon further review, i have discovered that there are about 15 players hare at cc that are in their 70's...
not really sure how many are intelligent, or how many are completely senile...
But one thing is for certain,,, none of them can get it up anymore...