Fircoal did do some useful analysis early in the day, then voted for Naxus and stuck with it for the rest of the day.
Aage seems to be town, since if he was scum, he could have just taken the easy out and voted for Naxus. Mafia usually don't put themselves in the spotlight just to defend a townie they can easily lynch.
I find Serbia the most suspicious right now...
Serbia wrote:Fircoal wrote:colton24 wrote:Naxus didn't target safari and steal his vote...
Do we need any more proof that Naxus is scum?colton24 wrote:He isn't scum unless the scum have a hider role...
And now I'm confused... explain further?
Serbia wrote:There certainly is a lot of unforced claiming going on early on in a game. I know I haven't played in a while, but seems to me a bit paranoid to start claiming things this early, especially things like "I tried my action on someone, but they got killed before it worked, booz0rs", and "I tried it on this one guy, but it didn't work, and I got his ability, except it's not his ability, so somehow someone else targeted the SAME PLAYER (like, maybe, 3 of us all did LOL WUT?!) and I got some third party ability! Cool huh?" I'm suspicious of all of these claims, because I don't see the point in it just yet.
Serbia wrote:Naxus does look scummy to me. And if he does pop up as scum, then lala and aage could be the threesome we're looking for.
VOTE: Naxus
Correct me if I'm wrong, but these are the only posts I've seen from Serbia during Day 2. The first is a trivial request for colton to be more clear. The second one is pointing out that unforced claiming is suspicious, without really saying who he thinks is scum. The third is a vote towards the popular lynch, which would likely not be seen as scummy since it was the consensus lynch. It seems scummy to me to barely say anything during the discussion, then follow the mistaken townie towards the lynch. Vote: Serbia