Moderator: Cartographers
If you could please:ender516 wrote:Okay, here is the XML with the Galician regions renamed, and the accent dropped from Domnonee. I have made no coordinate changes, but at a quick glance I don't see the need for any.
Celtic_7_Nations.1.5.xml
I love you.ender516 wrote:Try this on for size:
Celtic_7_Nations.1.6.xml
Sure, you say that now, but will you respect me tomorrow?The Bison King wrote:I love you.ender516 wrote:Try this on for size:
Celtic_7_Nations.1.6.xml
Trust me, when you wake up, I'll be long gone.ender516 wrote:Sure, you say that now, but will you respect me tomorrow?The Bison King wrote:I love you.ender516 wrote:Try this on for size:
Celtic_7_Nations.1.6.xml


That's my only nitpick.RedBaron0 wrote:On that awkward note.... lets hear if there are any final nitpicks and/or issues.
well now I love youRedBaron0 wrote:On that awkward note.... lets hear if there is any final nitpicks and or issues.
You hussy...The Bison King wrote:well now I love youRedBaron0 wrote:On that awkward note.... lets hear if there is any final nitpicks and or issues.
When they're lighter the letters are too hard to see.Victor Sullivan wrote:Okay, I lied. I do have 1 nitpick: Could you have the colors of the fancy capital letters in the legend match (color-wise) better with their corresponding bonus areas? They are rather dark in comparison.


Why ask the same question 3 times?Why insist on English names for the bonus regions?
Why not just get rid of the English altogether?
You already have the native names on the map, so why not just use them?
Also the Gaelic names are shorter and look kind of weird in the legend by themselves.the idea is to show both. I want to use the English names Primarily for familiarity and simplicity but also show the the Gaelic names for Cultural and historical relevance. That's the best way I thought to do it.
It absolutely is NOT of the modern day situation. Galicia isn't a country, Brittany's part of France, and Cornwall's part of England. This map is of a time around the fall of the Roman empire after the Celts were pushed out of Mainland Europe and after the Normans invaded England between the 1st and 3rd century AD. It says this on the very first page:And another thing, this map is of the modern day situation, so why use the names Loegria and Gaul? When those names were used, they were inhabited by Celtic peoples, and thus wouldn't have been excluded from this map.
Gaul is what the Romans called that region, you might have something with Loegria though since that is a caltic name for that region, but I figured from an early celtic point of view they may have still called that region that even after it was inhabited by the Normans.Until the 2nd century BC The Celts lived across the whole of central and western Europe. Around the reign of Julius Caeser the Romans began to push the Celts out of mainland Europe, until they were limited to the fringes of western Europe and the Islands of Great Britain and Ireland. Later in AD times the Normans invaded great Britain and pushed the Celts out of the heart of the Island. The only areas left with a Celtic cultural presence became known as the Celtic 7 Nations.
The celtic "nations" within the borders that you show on this map is most definitely the modern situation. At any other time in history they would have been completely different.The Bison King wrote:It absolutely is NOT of the modern day situation. Galicia isn't a country, Brittany's part of France, and Cornwall's part of England.tokle wrote:And another thing, this map is of the modern day situation, so why use the names Loegria and Gaul? When those names were used, they were inhabited by Celtic peoples, and thus wouldn't have been excluded from this map.
Just because it says this on the first page, doesn't mean that it is true.The Bison King wrote:This map is of a time around the fall of the Roman empire after the Celts were pushed out of Mainland Europe and after the Normans invaded England between the 1st and 3rd century AD. It says this on the very first page:
From the very 1st post:Until the 2nd century BC The Celts lived across the whole of central and western Europe. Around the reign of Julius Caeser the Romans began to push the Celts out of mainland Europe, until they were limited to the fringes of western Europe and the Islands of Great Britain and Ireland. Later in AD times the Normans invaded great Britain and pushed the Celts out of the heart of the Island. The only areas left with a Celtic cultural presence became known as the Celtic 7 Nations.
Gaul is English, not Latin, it is derived from German and is related to the word Wales. The Romans called it Gallia. Loegria is Latin though, as the british (celts) would have said Logres.The Bison King wrote: Gaul is what the Romans called that region, you might have something with Loegria though since that is a caltic name for that region, but I figured from an early celtic point of view they may have still called that region that even after it was inhabited by the Normans.


Then wouldn't that be fine? If I called Gaul Gallia and England Loegria. That way I'm still using the Roman names for both regions, but shouldn't Brittania also be acceptable?The Romans called it Gallia. Loegria is Latin though, as the british (celts) would have said Logres.
Well, then you would have to reason why you would use Latin, I guess. I would have called them England and France, or use the Gaelic, Sasana and An Fhrainc.The Bison King wrote:Then wouldn't that be fine? If I called Gaul Gallia and England Loegria. That way I'm still using the Roman names for both regions, but shouldn't Brittania also be acceptable?The Romans called it Gallia. Loegria is Latin though, as the british (celts) would have said Logres.




I made them about as large as I can I hope it helps. It may be possible to enlarge them a little more but I'll need to push some thing's around.The only nitpick I've got is the fancy capital letters you have for the bonus names. While a nice idea, I think the level of detail for something of that size is more than getting lost.