Moderator: Community Team
Scott-Land wrote:So all you kids that don't like Blitz's methods or want to prevent a particular player from getting to the top, do what I did... I joined against them and took more away in points than I would ever in a thread. Gather your best team and play the man on Pelop War and beat 'em so he doesn't get to the top, don't bitch about it. Sometimes I'd lose but more times than not I would win-- that's where you should fight the fight, not in some bullshit jealousy thread. But again for 99% of you, you'd get your asses handed to you so you'd rather hide behind your posts instead of playing.
Blitzaholic wrote:thx all
and thx for all who teamed with me during that time, you are deserve the credit as well, could not of done it without you all, which includes:
*long list of names*
Blitzaholic wrote:I am preparing my thank you speech for all who helped me, coming soon.
Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
denominator wrote:Scott-Land wrote:So all you kids that don't like Blitz's methods or want to prevent a particular player from getting to the top, do what I did... I joined against them and took more away in points than I would ever in a thread. Gather your best team and play the man on Pelop War and beat 'em so he doesn't get to the top, don't bitch about it. Sometimes I'd lose but more times than not I would win-- that's where you should fight the fight, not in some bullshit jealousy thread. But again for 99% of you, you'd get your asses handed to you so you'd rather hide behind your posts instead of playing.
I did that and tried inviting some of the people in this thread to play on my team against Blitz. Unsurprisingly, most of them were on someone's foe list and therefore cannot join the game.
natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Yeah, they all pretty much do when it comes to the top of the scoreboard. Dabblers and renaissance men tend not to stay at very high rank.
Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Yeah, they all pretty much do when it comes to the top of the scoreboard. Dabblers and renaissance men tend not to stay at very high rank.
natty_dread wrote:Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Yeah, they all pretty much do when it comes to the top of the scoreboard. Dabblers and renaissance men tend not to stay at very high rank.
The "top of the scoreboard" wasn't specified in the original question.
nagerous wrote:It is pretty easy to maintain a major rank, playing whatever settings you want to, which is what I do.
natty_dread wrote:Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Yeah, they all pretty much do when it comes to the top of the scoreboard. Dabblers and renaissance men tend not to stay at very high rank.
The "top of the scoreboard" wasn't specified in the original question.
Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Incandenza wrote:natty_dread wrote:Doesn't everybody do something in one fashion or another to optimize the amount of points they can win
no
Yeah, they all pretty much do when it comes to the top of the scoreboard. Dabblers and renaissance men tend not to stay at very high rank.
The "top of the scoreboard" wasn't specified in the original question.
But it was implied in the ongoing discussion in the thread, which is "things that blitz in particular and others in general do to get to the top few slots of the scoreboard."nagerous wrote:It is pretty easy to maintain a major rank, playing whatever settings you want to, which is what I do.
I concur. I think anyone with a good head on their shoulders and the discipline to stay away from assdoodles should be able to stay above 2000 without too much effort. But doubling that? Hell, tripling it, like scott and herp and sjnap did? That's a whole different kettle of fish right there.
nagerous wrote:I don't even have the discipline to stay away from assdoodles!And all well and good that those guys managed to get so high but the methods used were questionable at best, Herpes opponents in City Mogul 1vs1 for example were nearly always inexperienced new players who didn't know how freestyle on that map would work, even if they were not directly breaking the rules.. but that is a different point to the one I was actually making, which was a rebuttal of your original quote.
nagerous wrote: Herpes opponents in City Mogul 1vs1 for example were nearly always inexperienced new players who didn't know how freestyle on that map would work, even if they were not directly breaking the rules.. but that is a different point to the one I was actually making, which was a rebuttal of your original quote.
Scott-Land wrote:nagerous wrote: Herpes opponents in City Mogul 1vs1 for example were nearly always inexperienced new players who didn't know how freestyle on that map would work, even if they were not directly breaking the rules.. but that is a different point to the one I was actually making, which was a rebuttal of your original quote.
That's the exact point I was trying to make before in an earlier post. Herpes beat a ton of noobs on CIty Mogul , sure, but the point is he he would beat the hell out of you on it as well. Statements like that are a complete joke. Guys that can't beat him on the map and spew out garbage that he has to beat noobs in order to get to Conqueror. Do I agree with getting there by playing 1 vs 1s ? No, but I don't take away from the skill level required because Herpes prolly beat me 50% of the time on the map and would certainly crush your little ass 100% of the time if you grew enough balls to join against him. But you don't, you sit by and judge that he beats noobs. Isn't this entire thread about hypocrisy ?? But yet no one really sees the hypocrisy being spewed by these Monday morning fucking armchair quarterbacks.
Incandenza wrote:nagerous wrote:I don't even have the discipline to stay away from assdoodles!And all well and good that those guys managed to get so high but the methods used were questionable at best, Herpes opponents in City Mogul 1vs1 for example were nearly always inexperienced new players who didn't know how freestyle on that map would work, even if they were not directly breaking the rules.. but that is a different point to the one I was actually making, which was a rebuttal of your original quote.
When I talk about the top of the scoreboard, I really mean like 4000+, 4500+, not like the first couple of pages. I'm talking like the top tenth of a percent... Anyone who really wants to get up to those rarified heights need to specialize, and sometimes they specialize in something dodgy (or something that was dodgy at the time and has since been ruled illegal). But that's their lookout. And even the "dodgy" bit is open to interpretation, so basically I dunno why there's so much agonized hand-wringing.
army of nobunaga wrote:i like drama... but someone please explain to me what blitz is doing that 200 other top players dont? At least he doesnt play nothing but privates down in freestyle trap games 1vs1... which to me is lower than scum.
Scott-Land wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:i like drama... but someone please explain to me what blitz is doing that 200 other top players dont? At least he doesnt play nothing but privates down in freestyle trap games 1vs1... which to me is lower than scum.
Exactly... if you want to attack a player for his shadiness then use examples like that Heckler or Hoekster guy not one that will outplay you under the table. Don't attack guys that are better than you like the Blitz's and the Herpe's.
army of nobunaga wrote:i like drama... but someone please explain to me what blitz is doing that 200 other top players dont? At least he doesnt play nothing but privates down in freestyle trap games 1vs1... which to me is lower than scum.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
army of nobunaga wrote:i like drama... but someone please explain to me what blitz is doing that 200 other top players dont? At least he doesnt play nothing but privates down in freestyle trap games 1vs1... which to me is lower than scum.
army of nobunaga wrote:Scott-Land wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:i like drama... but someone please explain to me what blitz is doing that 200 other top players dont? At least he doesnt play nothing but privates down in freestyle trap games 1vs1... which to me is lower than scum.
Exactly... if you want to attack a player for his shadiness then use examples like that Heckler or Hoekster guy not one that will outplay you under the table. Don't attack guys that are better than you like the Blitz's and the Herpe's.
I didnt attack him, and I wouldnt, I respect him.
I see others doing that. And it probably is mostly jealousy. But I think the point is that the point system is what is setting everyone against one another.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users