CC's Top 10 Flame Warriors [Poll Added]

[Army of GOD]

Other: Army of GOD

That guy writes gold every time his fingers touch the keyboard!

[jefjef]

Other: Army of GOD

That guy writes gold every time his fingers touch the keyboard!

That guy writes gold in his boxers...

No flames here.

[GENERAL STONEHAM]

No GENERAL, I'm worried you'll end up getting yourself banned again. And I don't want you to get banned again. You should know the way I feel....

Why do it publically?

Well, you know me GENERAL, no secrets.... well, except for that night with the three mexicans and that electric toothbrush....

No Joshy, I really don't know you.

I find it amazing or is it coincidence that Andy has warned me that I'm about to be PERMA-BANNED, after my response to your very public WARNING to me.

Thanks buddy, please don't pm me any more and as far as our team games together, when they're finished don't include me in any further games.

Give some people power and look what happens,
GS

[AndyDufresne]

Loyal Drone General Stoneham, I like how you use CAPS to EMPHASIZE WORDS.

I'd still VOTE for an 'OTHER' option in this POLL.


--Andy

[nagerous]

too many newbies voting in this poll, they weren't around for the old times of the flamers.

[AAFitz]

Oh no, here we go again... another chapter in the AAFitz vs GENERAL STONEHAM saga. Are you guys ever going to grow up, get along, and play nicely? You're both just causing trouble for yourselves, and probably get this perfectly legit thread locked.

One more time and listen closely this time. Your best pal there, came after me, not vice versa. The examples, and multiple examples are quite clear. Example, after example after example in threads I havent even posted in, him saying bullshit stuff about passive agressiveness and me harrassing him...again, and I not posting a thing.

So, your a mod now, accountable and expected to be fair. Feel free to post your opinion, but unless you see me saying something that is untrue or against the rules, youd better quote where I am actually out of line, because unlike you, I will back up what I am saying with fact, whereas you simply cannot.

However, I as always am reasonable. By all means, show me an example of how I am causing trouble, and doing anything more than just responding well within my rights. You have before said that Ive been attacking Stoneham, when in fact, I have provided actual examples where it is quite the opposite, time after time, thread after thread. Sure, I have had to respond occasionally when I have seen some absolute lies posted, and if thats against the rules so be it. But I listed the threads where I was being harassed and baited and trolled. Some of which I may have actually responded in...but always, within the rules.

I will however not sit back and have you accuse me of any wrong doing without examples however. So, show me some examples in a thread where I attack Stoneham of anything. I engaged him once, and only once in a thread, and that was in a cheating thread, in which he was warned as well. Other than that, any conversation was started by him, and even in most of those, I ignored him. If youd like the examples so you actually have some clue about what you are speaking, feel free to shoot a pm...actually, dont bother...the examples are forth coming. No doubt you will read all of them, and I look forward to your apology. If not you are not worthy of a bold name and should be kicked out of team CC for being biased so much as to not be worthy of the team.

[AAFitz]

Oh no, here we go again... another chapter in the AAFitz vs GENERAL STONEHAM saga. Are you guys ever going to grow up, get along, and play nicely? You're both just causing trouble for yourselves, and probably get this perfectly legit thread locked.

And if you choose to ignore my explanation. Please point out how and where I am causing any trouble. Please quote me, and explain where I am out of line. I am truly sorry if he continues to harass me in thread after thread, and I barely respond in most, but I am not in control of him, so its not my problem, its his, and as a very easy search of threads, which I provided simply proves this, I suggest you actually look, at the situation, instead of just making up what you think is happening.

You werent a mod before, so being biased and ignoring the truth was fine, but now that your a mod, sorry to say, youll actually have to be unbiased and make decisions based on what actually happens, and not in favor of your buddies.

It seems youre the one that needs to grow up in this situation. Out of pure bias for your friend, who incidentally, just essentially ignored you....you have been accusing me of things I have not been guilty of for a very long time...and all because you were too lazy, or to biased to actually look at the facts, which I suggested...more than once.

I myself have moved on a long time ago. If you however expect me to sit back every single time I am unfairly accused of something, well, that is simply not going to happen.

[AAFitz]

No GENERAL, I'm worried you'll end up getting yourself banned again. And I don't want you to get banned again. You should know the way I feel....

Yes, we all know how you feel. You feel that its perfectly fine that your buddy has been harassing me for a long time and you have looked the other way and listened to his comical accusations that it was actually me.

I of course however provided the actual examples that simply proves it all to be the complete opposite, and unless you completely ignore all evidence, you or anyone else simply have no choice but to see it for what it is.

In any case the threads are all there. The examples are all quite clear, and all Ive ever done, except for one example out of at least 10, is respond to a direct attack or mention of my name. And usually, I dont even respond to the pathetic attempts to gain my attention. Again, do your actual job, and look at the evidence. Its all there, and all very clear. Most people, many of whom have posted exactly this have pointed it out already. You simply ignored my suggestion to check your facts, and now as a mod of CC, you have proven yourself so biased and so willing to overlook what actually happened, as to be quite frankly comical.

So Ill take your warning...but you may very well want to take mine, because you simply wont find any evidence of me harassing him except for one. But it is very easy to find multiple examples of you posting that it was me harassing him, when quite clearly, it was the complete reverse, unless of course, you simply dont read what was actually written.

I myself already sent in a formal complaint, and ignored all further attacks by whatever this guy is....and would never have spoken of it or to him ever again, until I saw your unfounded, childish and unfair accusations of me. Feel free to check with your team on this...unless its too much trouble once again...to check the facts....

and once again...just to make it easy for you...heres the actual situation:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=114036&start=0&hilit=GENERAL+STONEHAM+aafitz

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=112714&p=2511863&hilit=GENERAL+STONEHAM+aafitz#p2511863

search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&keywords=GENERAL+STONEHAM++aafitz&fid[]=6&start=15

search.php?st=0&sk=t&sd=d&sr=posts&keywords=GENERAL+STONEHAM++aafitz&fid[]=6&start=30

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=115985&p=2566761&hilit=GENERAL+STONEHAM+aafitz#p2566761

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=116011&p=2566880&hilit=+STONEHAM+aafitz#p2566880

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=116011&p=2566527&hilit=+STONEHAM+aafitz#p2566527

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=95690&p=2191580&hilit=+STONEHAM+aafitz#p2191580

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=117190&start=15

Game 6253277

Feel free to quote me and let me know where I am the one out of line, or causing trouble, as you suggested.

[jefjef]

I see 3 AA posts all in a long lengthy worded row. Most off topic and some of which appears to be a C & A complaint intentionally mis-posted here.

Isn't that against the rules?

Yes I agree with andy. I would have preferred to select OTHER. The majority listed are ?.

[TheProwler]

I think I'm gonna cum!

[Army of GOD]

*searches ConquerClubnotes for a summary of those AAFitz posts*

[jefjef]

*searches ConquerClubnotes for a summary of those AAFitz posts*

His posts are so long and so many they come up on Yahoo searches.

Why wasn't AoG on this poll?

[JoshyBoy]

I have nothing to say to AAFitz, I am just trying to look out for my friend, GENERAL STONEHAM. You are both as guilty as each other of some sort of trolling/flaming in my opinion, but he is my friend, has been for a while, and I'd rather not see him banned again.

[AAFitz]

I have nothing to say to AAFitz, I am just trying to look out for my friend, GENERAL STONEHAM. You are both as guilty as each other of some sort of trolling/flaming in my opinion, but he is my friend, has been for a while, and I'd rather not see him banned again.

Of course you dont. Of course you have ignored the multiple examples of him attacking me, and the fact that Ive ever only responded. He is your friend and therefore you ignore all of it for that friendship. We all understand that.

But I would suggest focusing on suggestions and not areas out of your depth, especially when as you say, you are completely biased, and not even concerned with the actual situation...only in protecting your friend, no matter what he does, or how many times he does it.

I am sorry your friend left you though and wont play games or listen to your pms anymore.

[AAFitz]

I see 3 AA posts all in a long lengthy worded row. Most off topic and some of which appears to be a C & A complaint intentionally mis-posted here.

Isn't that against the rules?

Yes I agree with andy. I would have preferred to select OTHER. The majority listed are ?.

Actually, my post is as on topic as the one accusing me of something unfairly and based on complete lies with no facts whatsoever. In any case, Ill happily take a ban for protecting myself from unfair accusations, and simply provided all the examples which show that is the case.

They are lengthy, but I do not believe there is a rule against using too many words. Yet.

Your post is off topic too by those standards, even with you agreeing with andy..even though all of us agree with andy that the poll lacks the real names that are the best. In fact, that has been the main body of my posts all along. Most just happen to disagree with that opinion.

[JoshyBoy]

I'd like to see someone post a new thread with real contenders for CC's Top 10 Flame Warriors. Of course, if we brought back Flame Wars, it would be a lot easier to see who the top dogs are.

[AAFitz]

I'd like to see someone post a new thread with real contenders for CC's Top 10 Flame Warriors. Of course, if we brought back Flame Wars, it would be a lot easier to see who the top dogs are.

I completely agree. However, the term top dog is always a matter of personal choice. Some like Pitbulls that only attack children, and others prefer St. Bernards that are devoted to saving lives.

The definition of a good flamer itself is really what would be interesting, and there would be many different definitions, no doubt.

[trapyoung]

So I added an "Other" option like Andy recommended and zeroed out the poll. At midway tally the run of it was 12 or so for Ronc, 7 or so for DM, those were the lead two

[JoshyBoy]

I'd like to see someone post a new thread with real contenders for CC's Top 10 Flame Warriors. Of course, if we brought back Flame Wars, it would be a lot easier to see who the top dogs are.

I completely agree. However, the term top dog is always a matter of personal choice. Some like Pitbulls that only attack children, and others prefer St. Bernards that are devoted to saving lives.

The definition of a good flamer itself is really what would be interesting, and there would be many different definitions, no doubt.

Yeah, I guess it depends on what you prefer to see. Someone mercilessly picking someone apart with crude cheap shots or some more sophisticated form of "ownage". I voted for other... but I'm not sure who yet.

*Mr. C quite severely owned me via PM a while ago. A little private kind of Flame War, and it was quite good fun actually.*

[AndyDufresne]

I voted for Other. Perhaps you need to have multiple polls over time, and specific Eras (perhaps by year). Then pick the top from each Era, and pit those against each other in a steel-cage deathmatch---to the death.


--Andy

[TheProwler]

I'd be up for a match to the death.

Or maybe a whole new forum should be created....maybe call it...hmmm, I don't know....


Flame Wars.


I wonder if there would be any interest....

[Falkomagno]

I see 3 AA posts all in a long lengthy worded row. Most off topic and some of which appears to be a C & A complaint intentionally mis-posted here.

Isn't that against the rules?

Yes I agree with andy. I would have preferred to select OTHER. The majority listed are ?.

Foe fitzy lips is the best thing to do...since there is no need to scroll as hell while reading in the fora

[billy07]

and so there we have it!

ronc (who?) voted top flame warrior.

stoneham banned for something or other.

and for nostaligia, prowler pops in to kill the thread.

who said these forums were dead?

[TheProwler]

That post may have just killed the thread.

[chaosfactor]

Ronc??

Conquer club Flamewars....???? He wasn't in it.

When Ronc arrived at P.O.A flame wars he got annihilated by everyone and the garden gnome.

He then beat a hasty retreat back to the moderated flame-less zone of conquer clubs forums.