...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
neanderpaul14 wrote:Wow gay republicans, they should go hang out with the pro gun democrats.
My guess would be that there are significantly more pro-gun Democrats than there are gay Republicans...just thinking of all the Democrats I served with in the military with military folks tending toward being pro-gun.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
neanderpaul14 wrote:Wow gay republicans, they should go hang out with the pro gun democrats.
My guess would be that there are significantly more pro-gun Democrats than there are gay Republicans...just thinking of all the Democrats I served with in the military with military folks tending toward being pro-gun.
Also, the Democrats are too cowardly to actually come out fully against guns (in fact this administration created the largest expansion of gun rights in a long time).
Truly don't understand any gay people who vote or join the GOP, makes no sense.
neanderpaul14 wrote:Wow gay republicans, they should go hang out with the pro gun democrats.
My guess would be that there are significantly more pro-gun Democrats than there are gay Republicans...just thinking of all the Democrats I served with in the military with military folks tending toward being pro-gun.
Oh wow, anecdotal evidence you are truly a master debater
neanderpaul14 wrote:Wow gay republicans, they should go hang out with the pro gun democrats.
My guess would be that there are significantly more pro-gun Democrats than there are gay Republicans...just thinking of all the Democrats I served with in the military with military folks tending toward being pro-gun.
Oh wow, anecdotal evidence you are truly a master debater
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
neanderpaul14 wrote:Wow gay republicans, they should go hang out with the pro gun democrats.
My guess would be that there are significantly more pro-gun Democrats than there are gay Republicans...just thinking of all the Democrats I served with in the military with military folks tending toward being pro-gun.
Oh wow, anecdotal evidence you are truly a master debater
You mean the phrase "my guess" didn't give you a bit of a hint that it was...you know...a guess?
So did you have something to say about the issue in question or did you just want to continue to fail in displaying any sort of an intelligence?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
you only think a gay republican is wierd because you think republicans have something against homo's. Most of that comes from the religious right (which also has a left BTW) It's just another issue. Democrats aint doing shit. homosexuality is a politcal card to them, to be played when needed, usually for garnering votes...
I've never had an issue with gay people and most people would say I am right wing, but well then the religious right is a source of frustration for me.
You can put me down as not wanting to see gay sex, but I have dozens of straight friends I wouldn't want to see doing the bump and grind either.
Phatscotty wrote:you only think a gay republican is wierd because you think republicans have something against homo's.
You mean other than not wanting them to speak up, right? They should be seen and not heard...and preferably not even seen?
I only ask because that's precisely what this thread is about.
rockfist wrote:I've never had an issue with gay people and most people would say I am right wing, but well then the religious right is a source of frustration for me.
The Republican party's current largest problem in my opinion is that they refuse to distance themselves from the religious right. Instead, they have embraced them...to their own difficulty. Instead, they choose to distance themselves from equal opportunity, as shown by this article.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
rockfist wrote:I've never had an issue with gay people and most people would say I am right wing, but well then the religious right is a source of frustration for me.
The Republican party's current largest problem in my opinion is that they refuse to distance themselves from the religious right. Instead, they have embraced them...to their own difficulty. Instead, they choose to distance themselves from equal opportunity, as shown by this article.
Depends on where you live. I can't really say much about other places, but other then the Matthew Shepherd media frenzy 11 years ago (really, how many other places did this kind of crap happen and ended up ignored by the national media, huh?), gays and conservatives in Wyoming have never really had problems. So long as gays don't go about in the Mr. Garrison way when he was trying to get fired by the school board, and other people don't bother them, there really isn't a problem. Actually, it has been pretty synonymous, minus Jackson and the out of state college students in Laramie.
rockfist wrote:I've never had an issue with gay people and most people would say I am right wing, but well then the religious right is a source of frustration for me.
The Republican party's current largest problem in my opinion is that they refuse to distance themselves from the religious right. Instead, they have embraced them...to their own difficulty. Instead, they choose to distance themselves from equal opportunity, as shown by this article.
Depends on where you live. I can't really say much about other places, but other then the Matthew Shepherd media frenzy 11 years ago (really, how many other places did this kind of crap happen and ended up ignored by the national media, huh?), gays and conservatives in Wyoming have never really had problems. So long as gays don't go about in the Mr. Garrison way when he was trying to get fired by the school board, and other people don't bother them, there really isn't a problem. Actually, it has been pretty synonymous, minus Jackson and the out of state college students in Laramie.
So as long as homosexuals mind their place? That's sort of what it sounds like you're saying.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
rockfist wrote:I've never had an issue with gay people and most people would say I am right wing, but well then the religious right is a source of frustration for me.
The Republican party's current largest problem in my opinion is that they refuse to distance themselves from the religious right. Instead, they have embraced them...to their own difficulty. Instead, they choose to distance themselves from equal opportunity, as shown by this article.
Depends on where you live. I can't really say much about other places, but other then the Matthew Shepherd media frenzy 11 years ago (really, how many other places did this kind of crap happen and ended up ignored by the national media, huh?), gays and conservatives in Wyoming have never really had problems. So long as gays don't go about in the Mr. Garrison way when he was trying to get fired by the school board, and other people don't bother them, there really isn't a problem. Actually, it has been pretty synonymous, minus Jackson and the out of state college students in Laramie.
So as long as homosexuals mind their place? That's sort of what it sounds like you're saying.
No, you misunderstood. Let me put it a little simpler, and in a way that it attributes to most "debate" (for lack of a better term) things here.
"We don't screw around with your way of life, you don't screw around with ours." You can pretty much name your 2 opposing sides in a debate on here, and that saying above applies to it here. Though I will admit that there is often a short fuse with people from say, California or the North East Coast, as more often then not, the culture clash is too different.