F1fth wrote:And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
No, but what else do we have to work off of?
As far as I know, there isn't much on the board at all. Your vote for duday seems just as weak as ours for colton, and if we HAVE to lynch SOMEONE, unless something drastic happens, we won't have much anyway.
F1fth wrote:And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
No, but what else do we have to work off of?
As far as I know, there isn't much on the board at all. Your vote for duday seems just as weak as ours for colton, and if we HAVE to lynch SOMEONE, unless something drastic happens, we won't have much anyway.
Actually we don't HAVE to lynch someone unless this was LYLO. Not the case here. "He talks to much" is TOTAL shit for a vote. I talk too much in a lot of places. Got a problem with that? FOS AoG
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
F1fth wrote:And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
No, but what else do we have to work off of?
As far as I know, there isn't much on the board at all. Your vote for duday seems just as weak as ours for colton, and if we HAVE to lynch SOMEONE, unless something drastic happens, we won't have much anyway.
Actually we don't HAVE to lynch someone unless this was LYLO.
Ok! Ok! I didn't know that. Geez, I'm still a rookie.
F1fth wrote:And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
No, but what else do we have to work off of?
As far as I know, there isn't much on the board at all. Your vote for duday seems just as weak as ours for colton, and if we HAVE to lynch SOMEONE, unless something drastic happens, we won't have much anyway.
Actually we don't HAVE to lynch someone unless this was LYLO. Not the case here. "He talks to much" is TOTAL shit for a vote. I talk too much in a lot of places. Got a problem with that? FOS AoG
No lynching is a scum tactic... we don't have to lynch someone?? Lynching gives us evidence, that only reaffirms my vote for you, plus the fact that f1fth is the person I am actually most suspicious of after his BS on day 2 and he is stringently defending you
Ok I just re-read the whole thread, tried to find anything useful in the SFX!/nag malarky from day 1 (scum/town) but I found it hard to find anything too useful. AceArtemis can be viewed as slightly scummy in his eventual switch to my bandwagon. F1fth I think I misconstrued what he was doing earlier, as it is clear he was attempting to see what a bandwagon on me might lead to scum joining and it was unfortunate that I had been lynched with just the 3 votes on me.. another being cowboyz. Spurg seemed quite genuine in the discussions too.
F1fth wrote:And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
No, but what else do we have to work off of?
As far as I know, there isn't much on the board at all. Your vote for duday seems just as weak as ours for colton, and if we HAVE to lynch SOMEONE, unless something drastic happens, we won't have much anyway.
Actually we don't HAVE to lynch someone unless this was LYLO. Not the case here. "He talks to much" is TOTAL shit for a vote. I talk too much in a lot of places. Got a problem with that? FOS AoG
No lynching is a scum tactic... we don't have to lynch someone?? Lynching gives us evidence, that only reaffirms my vote for you, plus the fact that f1fth is the person I am actually most suspicious of after his BS on day 2 and he is stringently defending you
Well yes it would be nice for a lynch, but from what I thought is that AoG was thinking that we HAVE to lynch someone every day.
Rainbow Eater wrote:
nagerous wrote:unvote vote / for submarining and attempting to avoid controversy as much as possible
/ has not posted in a while, I am willing to travel this path.
vote /
/ posting alot other places, not here....vote /
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
F1fth wrote: I'm voting for you because of you behavior on previous bandwagons, not because you said you wanted to daykill someone to make the game more interesting. I'd still like to to hear your defense for that before I decide to change my mind about the vote.
And does anyone have any justification for voting Colton besides "he talks too much"? I mean, he certainly does, but come on. That seems like a weak reason.
(One last thing, the vote correction only needed one succinct post. Making frequent one word/one sentence responses that add absolutely nothing to the game only makes the thread harder to navigate and thus the game harder to play. This applies more than just vote corrections of course, but everything [and specifically, to Colton].)
oh hehe, my bad. Usually to get a lynch you would need to bandwagon a bit. And I voted for a valid reason (usually) or what I thought would be the best vote at the time.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
colton24 wrote:/ posting alot other places, not here....vote /
Lies! If you look at my post tracker I am barely modding my own game. oh wait.... Can you forgive me for Bodhi Day, Saint Nicholas' Day, Hanukkah, or some other winter holiday? I'll be more active in a few days
colton24 wrote:/ posting alot other places, not here....vote /
Lies! If you look at my post tracker I am barely modding my own game. oh wait.... Can you forgive me for Bodhi Day, Saint Nicholas' Day, Hanukkah, or some other winter holiday? I'll be more active in a few days
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
colton24 wrote:/ posting alot other places, not here....vote /
Lies! If you look at my post tracker I am barely modding my own game. oh wait.... Can you forgive me for Bodhi Day, Saint Nicholas' Day, Hanukkah, or some other winter holiday? I'll be more active in a few days
I won't waste your time, how unfortunate for you to request my claim. The town roleblocker. I wonder if I'll be protected tonight? Oh and I blocked CW Night 0, Duday Night one, and skipped last night. Need to verify that/out more power roles?
I believe unless no one counters. unvote. Now I do have to say about duday is that earlier on the SFX! BW and then switching to the nag BW once SFX! BW died was very scummy. Seems like he justed wanted to BW and lynch someone to me. Vote duday. for the reason above and to avoid a No Lynch.
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
/ wrote:I won't waste your time, how unfortunate for you to request my claim. The town roleblocker. I wonder if I'll be protected tonight? Oh and I blocked CW Night 0, Duday Night one, and skipped last night. Need to verify that/out more power roles?
Roleblocked me on night one, thanks lol. But notice how there was still a gunslinger mafia kill during night 1. Which may help prove that I am not a gunslinger. (Of course if it works like other mafia games then I could still be scum, just not the godfather)
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Rainbow Eater wrote:unvote for now. Can either of you verify that you had a role blocked?
This is a very good question. I'd like to hear it answered, CW and duday. It would be great to have a verified roleblocker on town's side if we have a doc to protect him... unless he happens to be a scum roleblocker. That'd be a different matter.
<>---------------------------<> ......Come play CC Mafia, .....where happiness lies <>----------[Link]----------<>