Moderator: Community Team
naktay01 wrote:What can you say about Blitz that has not already been said. He is the best of the best. No matter what kind of controversy others have brought up his game and his actions speak for themselves. The greatest player Conquer Club has ever seen. You taught me when I was stumbling around trying how to get above lieutenant. Thanks for all the help. It was my honor to play as your team mate.
5000 is not that far away. best wishes
ZawBanjito wrote:Okay okay okay.
There used to be some debate over who was the best #1 of all time. I always thought it was weidsun/kununoki/melinguras/clio, even if he/she/it was a multi. Then for a while there was controversy over the #1s, 'cause they only played doubles/triples. So no one could agree, although a lot of people went with personality. Pilate was a hell of a nice guy, if I recall right.
Well, the debate is over. Nobody needs to debate anymore. Blitz is the best there is, was, and probably ever will be. He wins every game he's in no matter what setup it is, and he's too damn nice to hate for it. What the hell? There's no point in even trying to beat that. It's over baby. Close the site down, there's no need to continue.
Congratulations, Blitzaholic.
sully800 wrote: How many games it took is a much more important criterion I think.
sully800 wrote:But anyway, the reason I said it should be # of games instead of # of days is because someone who plays twice as many games at a time wouldn't be better in my book than a person who reached 3000 just after them in # of days. Anyway, it doesn't really matter because you can't go back and calculate how many games the person had when they first reached 3000 (at least not with the ease of how many days it took them)
dugde, some people's purpose here is to accumulate points.dugcarr1 wrote: same shit different pile. It would easy to get that many points if your only purpose on here was to accumulate points.
No the real questions to ask are,,,,dugcarr1 wrote: the questions to ask,,,,, are they earning them like everyone else.
do they open singles games ... with no passwords?
do they always.... etc.
dugcarr1 wrote: all im saying as i could do what he did quit easily if my only goal was to accumulate "ever so important points"
Now I think you have said this many times before, but I don't recall any suggestion from you how the system should be changed. In particular, what in the new system would prevent manipulating, cheating, or bending the rules.dugcarr1 wrote: ITs time to keep track of score in a different way or change this system all together.
RL_Orange wrote:He blitz, congrats on 4000+, unbelievable...............so now you are a general for live? Or doesnt cc have any rewards for such an achievement?, lmao............lets introduce marschal as title or president even (for 5000+).........but i do hope you realize in the latter you are not voted president........you will be a dictator, lmao - a general taking the presidentship
Well done my friend, soon ill be joining you. I got a new goal now.
Loudawg wrote:thanks for the shout out Blitz .. its your accomplishments that drive this site to be a better place .. keeps the hype going and people interested ... general of all the armies
Q wrote:Hey,
Ya know what? I have only been on this site a couple of months, but I have already seen how easy it is to get bushwhacked, steamrolled, suicided and just plain "showed tha ropes".
If this guy has gotten to 4000 points- no matter how when or where -, he is my hero, and want to know what he charges for tutorials.
I would not even set that as a goal. I will never achieve it.
Well done blitz.
AAFitz wrote:Before this gets out of hand....
As far as Blitz goes...he had an objective....Get the most points on the board....so he did everything he could to acheive his goal, and ultimately succeeded.
Im sure he would love to play more singles games and three player games occasionally, but his goal was to gain points so he did...he did everything he had to to achieve his objective, which is what achiving an objective is all about. Gaining points in here is a strategy in and of itself, and no one plays it better than Blitz...his win ratio is ridiculous, and his points are out of the park...
More importantly, he really is a great guy....and this has contributed to his success...Triples is all about teamwork, and his diplomacy is what allows him to win those games...he is a master at coordinating players and getting them to work as a team and win games...Its also why everyone is posting their support.
ZawBanjito wrote:Okay okay okay.
There used to be some debate over who was the best #1 of all time. I always thought it was weidsun/kununoki/melinguras/clio, even if he/she/it was a multi. Then for a while there was controversy over the #1s, 'cause they only played doubles/triples. So no one could agree, although a lot of people went with personality. Pilate was a hell of a nice guy, if I recall right.
Well, the debate is over. Nobody needs to debate anymore. Blitz is the best there is, was, and probably ever will be. He wins every game he's in no matter what setup it is, and he's too damn nice to hate for it. What the hell? There's no point in even trying to beat that. It's over baby. Close the site down, there's no need to continue.
Congratulations, Blitzaholic.
osujacket wrote:CBlake wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Congrats Blitz.![]()
Alstergren - 1st to 3000
Blitzaholic - 1st to 4000
????? - 1st to 5000
Who will it be?
me
Yeah Righgt![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Just having fun cblake
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users