
Moderator: Cartographers
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
colton24 wrote:you kinda strike me as a multi seeing how you just joined but thats good
Evil DIMwit wrote:A few clarity issues right off the bat:
- Definitely make the continents easier to tell apart.
- The bonus list is practically invisible; I hardly noticed it at all. It needs to be much bigger.
- Four-way corners mean confusion about which territories can attack what. Does Marash touch Sivas? Does Ankara border Marash? Do Sinop and Trabzon touch? There should be no question about what touches what when looking at the map.
There's good potential in this, though. Nice work.
cairnswk wrote:Evil DIMwit wrote:A few clarity issues right off the bat:
- Definitely make the continents easier to tell apart.
- The bonus list is practically invisible; I hardly noticed it at all. It needs to be much bigger.
- Four-way corners mean confusion about which territories can attack what. Does Marash touch Sivas? Does Ankara border Marash? Do Sinop and Trabzon touch? There should be no question about what touches what when looking at the map.
There's good potential in this, though. Nice work.
Agree with all that.....plus Gelibolu is oft used as representing the Peninsula on the western side of the Dardanelles.
Is there another name you could find for the eastern side.
Good start.
el-presidente wrote:What is wrong with an 81 territory map?
apranaxfort wrote:
Only reason: i dont like big maps
But i will add 7 territories to map
apranaxfort wrote: I know there is no city named Efes in Turkey...
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users