what about:Suspect101 wrote:48 hours to the deadline, sned in your night actions.
5) At Night time (will only be 48 hour period) I will need actions submitted to me VIA PM
when did night get so long?
Moderator: Community Team
what about:Suspect101 wrote:48 hours to the deadline, sned in your night actions.
Yes it does.MrDizzle wrote:I'm a bit of a noob to mafia games....cult means that mafia recruits innocents at night instead of killing, right?
I agree. This is a good place to start looking for Day 1 tells.Falkomagno wrote:Well, so, the only information that we have already for sure is that there was a bandwagon against simon, and he was a third party role, with any attributes. To me, the ones in the bandwagon are a mix between townies and all the scum in the game. I think this because, if I were mafia, I would find profitable a 3rd party, because, all that I would know as mafia, is that Simon at least wasn`t a mafia member. So, I propose to start looking one by one the members of that wagon, and could determinate the scummier, to lynch ahead. If I'm wrong, show me the lacks in my argument.
The war is against mafia. However, Simon claimed a third party survivor. The common strategy for this type of role is to be as useless as possible and to lurk as much as possible so that:Falkomagno wrote:I notice that a reason against this point of view could be that a 3th party member lynch is not bad to town per se. I disagree at this respect, since the war is against mafia, as a main subject. But i know that reasons to both of that side has to be elaborated.
We could either lynch the claimed third party, or try someone else in the hopes of hitting mafia. Hitting mafia is better, I agree, but this was not a bad lynch for town.Falkomagno wrote:In the other hand, I think that a good start it's to call the attention of who, no mater simon's claiming, stills argue that he was a good choice to lynch. If I'm wrong, is a townie who look as a good deal to kill a third party instead a mafia goon. but I'm actually thinking that is a scum who accept that killing simon was safer for his faction.
This is what is bad about long nights, I can't really remember where we were at and other peoples intrest has dwindled.Falkomagno wrote:the intention of my last post was to put in the focus the people who voted for simon yesterday. since the only response came from Ace Artimis, I assume that the people are really busy, or the one who's not busy doesn't have anything to say about it.
In the other hand, I think that a good start it's to call the attention of who, no mater simon's claiming, stills argue that he was a good choice to lynch. If I'm wrong, is a townie who look as a good deal to kill a third party instead a mafia goon. but I'm actually thinking that is a scum who accept that killing simon was safer for his faction.
Vote Ace Artimis
since he was the one who hammered simon.
Sam's wagon at it's biggest:Suspect101 wrote: Thezzarus (1) - Simon Viavant
Simon Viavant (8) - pmchugh, thischarmingman, MrDizzle, Stroop, gimpyThewonder, LSU, AceArtemis
Sam_levi_11 (1) - AceArtemis, Hologram
PMC (2) - Nzen, Thessaruz
Not Voting:
Sam_levi_11, Falkomagno
There are three common names, Ace, Stroop and gimpy. Although for reasons above I am not really counting ace.Suspect101 wrote: Thezzarus (1) - Simon Viavant
Simon Viavant (3) - pmchugh, thischarmingman, MrDizzle
Nzen (1) - Sam_levi_11
Sam_levi_11 (6) - LSU, AceArtemis, Stroop, gimpyThewonder, Hologram
MrDizzle (1) - Falkomagno
PMC (1) - Nzen
Stroop (1) - Thezzaruz
His reasons for voting sam:Stroop wrote:The Simon lynch was fine. Granted, the initial reasons weren't the best...snip...I do think that we will find scum on the Simon-bandwagon, but I'll have to re-read before I have any thoughts to share.
His reasons for voting simon:Stroop wrote:So why are we trying to find out who's the vig? It won't really help town...
I suppose sam could use some more pressure for trying to off the vig... unvote vote sam
Neither vote is sincere almost as if he is trying to distance himself from voting them yet stil doing it. It seems these votes were made while looking over your shoulder and that stinks of suspicion to me.Stroop wrote:Two possible deadline lynches![]()
I'm going to go with the Simon bandwagon on this one. vote Simon
Reasons for voting simon:gimpyThewonder wrote:vote sam if for no other reason than it seems to be the consensus and someone has to die to gain us some info
It seems he is desperate for a lynch, is this scummy? Yes and no, because as a townie you want a lynch to gain info and as scum if you see a chance to off someone not in your group your not going to pass it up. Your reasoning is fine enough but it still seems suspicious to me, more for the way you said it than what you actually said.gimpyThewonder wrote:does that mean the deadline is closed or close?
if it isn't too late i'll switch my vote unvot vote simon just to get a succesful lynch and draw day 1 shenanigins to a close
The vote on sam was to get better info than "ohh, he's trying to lynch the vig". It's one of the few things we had to go on, and I went with it. Nothing came out of it (I think, haven't re-read yet), which is sad.pmchugh wrote:That leaves stroop and gimpy. Stroop just said:
His reasons for voting sam:Stroop wrote:The Simon lynch was fine. Granted, the initial reasons weren't the best...snip...I do think that we will find scum on the Simon-bandwagon, but I'll have to re-read before I have any thoughts to share.His reasons for voting simon:Stroop wrote:So why are we trying to find out who's the vig? It won't really help town...
I suppose sam could use some more pressure for trying to off the vig... unvote vote samNeither vote is sincere almost as if he is trying to distance himself from voting them yet stil doing it. It seems these votes were made while looking over your shoulder and that stinks of suspicion to me.Stroop wrote:Two possible deadline lynches![]()
I'm going to go with the Simon bandwagon on this one. vote Simon
unvote vote stroop
Don't think LSU is scum... with the double vote.pmchugh wrote:oops on reading over my post it seems I missed out LSU, I will leave him till later anyway since I already posted a lot.
where I basically outline what you say 2 posts later.gimpyThewonder wrote:look we all know that day 1 rarely catches out scum. what it does is give us information to work w/. someone has to be the sacrificial lamb, it's the way the game is played. the fact that Simon has yet to defend himself looks, well, bad. is it enough for a lynch? for Day 1, you bet it is. now i'm not going to throw the axiom of wanting a no lynch your way b/c your argument was sound and i enjoy logical pleas, but between lynching a townie for info or letting him live while the scult recruits/kills for free tonight while we gain nothing? it shouldn't be a difficult decision really.
I would assume not. Both the fact that it's shown as "killed by Vig" and that it happened during the day and the fact that scum kills in this game seems to be more of a recruitment into the nothingness than kills and I feel quite sure that it was a poorly chosen kill from a DayVig.pmchugh wrote: Anyway, there was a day kill yesterday but no kill tonight, perhaps that it was not actually a vig kill and rather it was a scum kill disguised as a vig kill?
Fair enough, that makes sense for now.gimpyThewonder wrote:pmc your logic makes sense in terms of who to look at but you neglected this post i made:
where I basically outline what you say 2 posts later.gimpyThewonder wrote:look we all know that day 1 rarely catches out scum. what it does is give us information to work w/. someone has to be the sacrificial lamb, it's the way the game is played. the fact that Simon has yet to defend himself looks, well, bad. is it enough for a lynch? for Day 1, you bet it is. now i'm not going to throw the axiom of wanting a no lynch your way b/c your argument was sound and i enjoy logical pleas, but between lynching a townie for info or letting him live while the scult recruits/kills for free tonight while we gain nothing? it shouldn't be a difficult decision really.
additionally, had I really been scum you wouldn't have seen me on the tail end of a lynch, its not my 1st rodeo
No that is the attitude you should have, not what you did have. You were trying to get players that you believed to be townie lynched while keeping out of the spotlight. A townie as you said wouldn't care about looking scummy in the process where as you clearly did.Stroop wrote:As for neither vote being sincere, I assume you mean that I don't seem to actually support my vote? That's because I didn't really think either of them was scum (not saying I think sam is town), but we needed the info.
So, all about the info, really. We needed it, and if digging for it made me look scummy... well, so be it.
Actually if I were scum I would recruit him precisely because of this.stroop wrote:Don't think LSU is scum... with the double vote.pmchugh wrote:oops on reading over my post it seems I missed out LSU, I will leave him till later anyway since I already posted a lot.
I did not try to get sam lynched, I tried to get info out of him. A slip-up, a claim, whatever. Then, I did try to get Simon lynched. I did not believe they were town, I also did not believe they were scum. As long as I have no info, everyone is both.pmchugh wrote:No that is the attitude you should have, not what you did have. You were trying to get players that you believed to be townie lynched while keeping out of the spotlight. A townie as you said wouldn't care about looking scummy in the process where as you clearly did.Stroop wrote:As for neither vote being sincere, I assume you mean that I don't seem to actually support my vote? That's because I didn't really think either of them was scum (not saying I think sam is town), but we needed the info.
So, all about the info, really. We needed it, and if digging for it made me look scummy... well, so be it.
Guys was simon a day kill vig then? If so i think i could have some good info.Stroop wrote:I did not try to get sam lynched, I tried to get info out of him. A slip-up, a claim, whatever. Then, I did try to get Simon lynched. I did not believe they were town, I also did not believe they were scum. As long as I have no info, everyone is both.pmchugh wrote:No that is the attitude you should have, not what you did have. You were trying to get players that you believed to be townie lynched while keeping out of the spotlight. A townie as you said wouldn't care about looking scummy in the process where as you clearly did.Stroop wrote:As for neither vote being sincere, I assume you mean that I don't seem to actually support my vote? That's because I didn't really think either of them was scum (not saying I think sam is town), but we needed the info.
So, all about the info, really. We needed it, and if digging for it made me look scummy... well, so be it.
How did I clearly care about looking scummy?
Also, when did we start assuming a cult leader? The quiet night suggests it, but where did it come from before that?