well, at least it's better than your mortifying pictures which ruined forever "The Bugs Bunny and Tweety Show" for me. You never told us why you had that sh!t on your comp...
Frankly, it's more screwed up than any furry pics or pornography in general that I have seen before...
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:well, at least it's better than your mortifying pictures which ruined forever "The Bugs Bunny and Tweety Show" for me. You never told us why you had that sh!t on your comp...
Frankly, it's more screwed up than any furry pics or pornography in general that I have seen before...
Ahh, just thinking about it makes me laugh out loud. It was so worth the warning PM from the mods. Anyhow, here's something you sick bastards can use as an aid to "rub one out"...
...and I never saw a problem with this one in the first place:
If we're the sick weirdos, what does that make you, given you have that disgusting crap on your computer? Are you also into kiddy porn there mate? Wouldn't surprise me, you sick f*ck. At least you'd be on similar mental and emotional level with those kids though, eh?
Ahem, I called you sick bastards, not sick weirdos. There is a subtle but important difference
what does that make you, given you have that disgusting crap on your computer?
A red-blooded male citizen of the 21st Century.
Are you also into kiddy porn there mate? Wouldn't surprise me, you sick f*ck. At least you'd be on similar mental and emotional level with those kids though, eh?
Thank you for the stimulating debate. In regards to the "kiddy porn" you reference, I present to you my counter-argument:
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:From the community Guidelines
Nudity and sexual material are not allowed.
Any images or textual descriptions of sexual activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed. This includes content posted here and links to other sites. Posting NSFW - "Not Suitable For Work" - does not make it ok for posting. If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point. Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.
ANY images. Any. It is not a loophole.
Holy Shit! I didn't even know they had changed the rules because of that avatar I used back then. I'm a little proud of myself.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Yo this thread is fucking disgusting. I'm not trolling, either.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Juan_Bottom wrote:Screw you furry. If you want respect try not wanting to have sex with animals. People respect that position.
I'M TAKING MY FORUMS BACK! THIS IS NOW A CHUBBY THREAD!
And you're the one trying to ban me? Now you're just being an asshole. Not liking something is one thing, but insulting other people for liking it is going too far.
Yeah, see, I never insulted anyone! I just showed how these disgusting images made me feel. I was showing my own reaction, same as Lucarilover240 was showing everyone his throbbing tumescence, grown thanks to these photos.
And I'm the one trolling?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Unfortunately I can't have that (in the link) as my avatar...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
clapper, I may be breaking an internet taboo here by explicitly stating it, but how much fun would this thread be if the only things being posted were picture of anthropomorphic animals and comments on how great the latest picture is, regardless of what its artistic merits are? Not very much fun. As it is we have two opposing viewpoints on a topic that no one takes very seriously so there's no real risk of saying anything offensive, this thread is pretty much an embodiment of "much ado about nothing". Would you really take that away from us?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
clapper011 wrote:keep it on topic. Frigidus, pimpdave any others that don't agree with this thread..tough luck.... either stop entering into this thread or deal... continue to bring it off topic and you will serve your punishments. Harsh? maybe..but obviously asking you guys nicely to stop derailing this topic isn't working.
clapper, I may be breaking an internet taboo here by explicitly stating it, but how much fun would this thread be if the only things being posted were picture of anthropomorphic animals and comments on how great the latest picture is, regardless of what its artistic merits are? Not very much fun. As it is we have two opposing viewpoints on a topic that no one takes very seriously so there's no real risk of saying anything offensive, this thread is pretty much an embodiment of "much ado about nothing". Would you really take that away from us?
Well I wouldn't say no one takes it seriously. Once I voiced my disapproval about the nature of the thread I relaxed. Not much else I could do . The rest of what you said though I agree with.
I AM MASTER SHEEP, TEH AWESOME
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:But surely not as seriously as, say, a thread about the intensity cubes being non-random or gun laws.
Oh no, not neatly as serious as one of those threads. Which need to gtfo my forums. Go debate in a place where people are more likely to flame you. That's where you all belong.
I AM MASTER SHEEP, TEH AWESOME
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.