supercram wrote:then he posted in THIS THREAD and said "sorry about that autoload."
that's an admission of guilt. so are you with them or what?
err.. because we are playing "nice" mafia scum?? You really think if Rev had anything to do with killing autoload, he would come and apologize about it?
yes. i think rev knows we've got his number and whatever he does now doesn't matter.
I know AK and I are not mafia.. we actually did do some talking tonight and concluded that since auto was a cop either of us was probably gone fast, however we have a few theories.
We think that possibly wicked or houssam are mafia, because of their random voting for eachother may be a red herring to keep us off the track.
I know you probably dont believe me but think about it.
Also I said sorry about that autoload when anyone dies in mafia pretty much, especially in the first round.. its sad.
supercram wrote:wicked (T) Defended AK rigorously, then wanted no lynch, then voted AK, then switched to autoload
Just wanted to clear this up, I was no lynch first, then defended IC, then voted IC ... never did I vote auto. I had one point at like 2am where I was frustrated and confused, so threw out a "what if" scenario that involved lynching auto, but never did I actively go after him.
Just wanted to point out anyone that does not vote for IC (or votes then unvotes IC) is trying to create confusion similar to day one. Townies know what to do, it is extremely obvious. Take note of who waffles on this vote and presses us to do something else. I'm sure as everyone else logs on throughout the day, we'll have the vote quickly.
reverend_kyle wrote:I know AK and I are not mafia.. we actually did do some talking tonight and concluded that since auto was a cop either of us was probably gone fast, however we have a few theories.
Ok.. I don't know what to say to that at this point.. we have a confirmed cop - that confirmed AK was infected. You are "sure" he is not mafia.. do you have anything more than his word?!
auto and kyle tried an interesting mafia strategy, which was to say "let's pretend to be masons, we'll even be blatant about our last names!"
unfortunately this backfired, since IC was fingered on the first night by the cop. they were able to successfully convince enough of us that auto may have been an "insane cop", now kyle throws out the thing about wicked/houssam, all of this an attempt to distract from something factual.
the simplest explanation is that auto was a cop, IC is mafia, and the kyle/IC mafia strategy has been exposed far earlier than they intended it to.
now we have the chance to eliminate 2 mafia from this game. i do not know if the infection is spreading, i do not know if someone here has a win condition that is aligned with mafia, but none of that should distract from the fact that are first two kills are pretty clear-cut.
IC
kyle and then...
?????????????
after we kill IC the mafia are going to have to be more vocal, they will not be able to hang back in the BG. so keep an eye on who becomes more active now.
wicked wrote:Just wanted to point out anyone that does not vote for IC (or votes then unvotes IC) is trying to create confusion similar to day one. Townies know what to do, it is extremely obvious. Take note of who waffles on this vote and presses us to do something else. I'm sure as everyone else logs on throughout the day, we'll have the vote quickly.
Oh go fish!
I did not waffle. I am clear on who I am voting for, and told everyone as much. I am just not quite sure why we have to rush things and waste a day where we could get clues. What's your rush anyway??
wicked wrote:Just wanted to point out anyone that does not vote for IC (or votes then unvotes IC) is trying to create confusion similar to day one. Townies know what to do, it is extremely obvious. Take note of who waffles on this vote and presses us to do something else. I'm sure as everyone else logs on throughout the day, we'll have the vote quickly.
supercram wrote: after we kill IC the mafia are going to have to be more vocal, they will not be able to hang back in the BG. so keep an eye on who becomes more active now.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Oh go fish! I did not waffle. I am clear on who I am voting for, and told everyone as much. I am just not quite sure why we have to rush things and waste a day where we could get clues. What's your rush anyway??
That was my point exactally when I voted for AC (thank you very much Cram...) Nothing more.
Kyles story matches with Auto's theory but I have a hard time believing Kyle and have all along. This is just the kind of twist that catches townies though so I thought it was worth the discussion too.
Why is Cram and Wicked pushing so hard for a fast vote?
You make a good point thus my vote but the more people talk the more chance we can find info. A quick lynching leave us with no idea where to go next except old theories. I am trying to go back and see all that Auto posted as we know he was on the level. I think one of the "Trusted" members of our group shouldn't be!
HoussamTheGreat wrote:I am just not quite sure why we have to rush things and waste a day where we could get clues.
hmm, what clues would you like next? Who the doc is so you can off him too? I am all for delaying the vote so everyone has a chance to weigh in. But hearing from the same people over and over with the same information only leads to confusion, as in day 1. I doubt anyone will come forward today with any clues, which is probably a smart move, as doing so got both Auto and Backglass killed. We have enough info now to lynch the next party.
Freetymes wrote:You make a good point thus my vote but the more people talk the more chance we can find info. A quick lynching leave us with no idea where to go next except old theories. I am trying to go back and see all that Auto posted as we know he was on the level. I think one of the "Trusted" members of our group shouldn't be!
You are correct Free! I almost forgot about going back and re-reading everything that Auto said! sheesh! I've got blinders on against IC now. Let us know what you find!!
the word of a confirmed cop is enough for me. i think the debate for who should be killed next should be left to tomarrow when we have even more information.
I did a quick search of all the stuff Auto said(note the word quick) and came across this:
autoload wrote: Now in order for this to work we need the doctor to protect me at night and we must come to a consensus on who I should investigate night 2. Please let there be a doctor, but If you ARE the Doctor, do not claim!!!
Seeing as autoload was killed, we either:
1.Have no doctor
2. Have a docter but whom ever that may be hasn't been very active(moz, perhaps?)
XenHu wrote:I did a quick search of all the stuff Auto said(note the word quick) and came across this:
autoload wrote: Now in order for this to work we need the doctor to protect me at night and we must come to a consensus on who I should investigate night 2. Please let there be a doctor, but If you ARE the Doctor, do not claim!!!
Seeing as autoload was killed, we either:
1.Have no doctor
2. Have a docter but whom ever that may be hasn't been very active(moz, perhaps?)
Just my two cents.. -X
D'oh! Forgot a point..
3. We have a doctor, but he/she is not coming forward for fear of asassination. In which case, we would hvae to find a way to protect him/her.
