Moderator: Cartographers
done in the xml file.the.killing.44 wrote:Could you move Trabzon's coordinates down a few pixels? On the small map it's not as much a problem because they are going to be cut off no matter what, but on the large map I think you can fit the numbers in the tert.
.44


Industrial Helix wrote:Ah, not sure if this goes here... but I believe Anglo-Egyptian Sudan is spelled incorrectly on the map. On the map its Anglo-Eyptian Sudan.

i personaly don't think so, but that just might be because i know that region very well (school does come in handy)ciguatera wrote:Menu is dreadfully difficult to match up with what territory corresponds to the color.
Then why weren't you in here while the map was in development telling me that. Get your act together please. Don't wait until maps are finished to tell mapmakers these things. You have a responsibility. Use it!ciguatera wrote:Menu is dreadfully difficult to match up with what territory corresponds to the color.

Sent to lackattack with fix upload. Thanks Industrial Helix.Industrial Helix wrote:Ah, not sure if this goes here... but I believe Anglo-Egyptian Sudan is spelled incorrectly on the map. On the map its Anglo-Eyptian Sudan.

Then why weren't you in here while the map was in development telling me that. Get your act together please. Don't wait until maps are finished to tell mapmakers these things. You have a responsibility. Use it!
lackattack wrote:updated!

Gilligan wrote:It says Iznir in the XML but looks like Izmir on the map.
Thanks guys.istanbul39 wrote:In dropdown menu, Izmir is mispelled "Iznir".

Cheers JVJames Vazquez wrote:hmm test


mpxy wrote:The name of one of the regions, Constantinopole, is wrong. It used to be the old name which was being used before the Ottoman conquest (which was many years ago before 1914). The correct name should be Istanbul.
cairnswk on December 15th, 2008 wrote:the.killing.44 on December 14th, 2008 wrote:
It says Constantinople there …
http://www.pbs.org/greatwar/maps/
http://www.onlyglobes.com/PhotoGallery. ... UM%2D30422
http://www.fsmitha.com/h2/map01eu.htm
http://www.scs.unr.edu/~kvidoni/1914euro.html
… and in all of those places.
Should I go on?
no, but i will....
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_IstanbulTherefore, on the basis of this quote above and the maps, i would be inclined to stick with ConstantinopleRepublic of Turkey
Main article: Turkey
When the Republic of Turkey was founded by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on October 29, 1923, the capital was moved from Istanbul to Ankara.
The city's Turkish name İstanbul was already in popular use among the local population, but the international name Constantinople also remained in use until the Turkish Postal Services Law of March 28, 1930, according to which all foreign countries were asked to solely use the name Istanbul also in their languages and their postal service networks.
Thanks for the feedback mpxy...do you equate with abts...sorry only joking.mpxy wrote:The name of one of the regions, Constantinopole, is wrong. It used to be the old name which was being used before the Ottoman conquest (which was many years ago before 1914). The correct name should be Istanbul.


As there hasn't been much discussion about this here, either before or after you brought it up, it doesn't look to be a major concern of players. I'd say this is your call, mapmaker.cairnswk wrote:What do others feel about inserting this link into the map to make the Russian Empire more vulnerable if someone holds O. Europe terts? The attack route would be bothways.