it doesPepperJack wrote:I believe my completely legitimate score of 3326 just barely squeezes me onto the list.
Moderator: Community Team
it doesPepperJack wrote:I believe my completely legitimate score of 3326 just barely squeezes me onto the list.
When Lack take the points off for this game Game 3960030 I will shed tears for you.My completely legitimate tears of laughter.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:it doesPepperJack wrote:I believe my completely legitimate score of 3326 just barely squeezes me onto the list.
KoE_Sirius wrote:When Lack take the points off for this game Game 3960030 I will shed tears for you.My completely legitimate tears of laughter.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:it doesPepperJack wrote:I believe my completely legitimate score of 3326 just barely squeezes me onto the list.![]()
PepperJack wrote:KoE_Sirius wrote:When Lack take the points off for this game Game 3960030 I will shed tears for you.My completely legitimate tears of laughter.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:it doesPepperJack wrote:I believe my completely legitimate score of 3326 just barely squeezes me onto the list.![]()
So it was me that started the turns of nearly 30 people ahead of me and 30 people after me? After the first elimination, everyone should have gotten the picture. I was just lucky to be not paying as much attention as many others. And don't forget that people had already posted in game chat not to start when e_i_pi (the last person after me) took his turn. Again, not my fault I was the furthest down the game order to pay attention.
Also, I will drink your crocodile tears. There will probably be a ritual involved.
what took place ?Aradhus wrote:Pepperjack, are you genuinely saying that because you didn't log on you think that you should keep the points you recieved in that Br game?
hmm..ok. well thats not his fault but he cant have credit to make top 100 for that.Aradhus wrote:The game was set in Arms race, and because of the coding of that map, everybody that logged on got instantly eliminated. 3 players didn't log on, deadbeated, and by the end of the third turn, the first two were kicked out, and Pj won because his name was last of the three.
Aradhus wrote:The game was set in Arms race, and because of the coding of that map, everybody that logged on got instantly eliminated. 3 players didn't log on, deadbeated, and by the end of the third turn, the first two were kicked out, and Pj won because his name was last of the three.
TeeGee wrote:1 King_Herpes 6133 2639 1941 (74%) Conqueror Conqueror 4.7 United States United States
must have faced some stiff competition there Herpes... your points increased by 2
aliakber1001 wrote:yo johnnyrocket you motherfucken peace of shit.
you think your lieing makes things true. motherfucker i was never busted for anything.
i wasnt even warned bitch. why dont you stop fucking yourself in the ass and take your head out of your motherfucken ass and look at reality. bitch.. and my high score was 3519 bitch.. so go f*ck yourself. son of bitch
I will find the thread later tonight. I think the key word you used is "cited" because the new rule went into effect after his account sitting abuse. So basically were just playing word games with timing.lancehoch wrote:aliakber1001 wrote:yo johnnyrocket you motherfucken peace of shit.
you think your lieing makes things true. motherfucker i was never busted for anything.
i wasnt even warned bitch. why dont you stop fucking yourself in the ass and take your head out of your motherfucken ass and look at reality. bitch.. and my high score was 3519 bitch.. so go f*ck yourself. son of bitch
ali, watch the language, but JR, he is right. He has never been cited for anything cheating related.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I will find the thread later tonight. I think the key word you used is "cited" because the new rule went into effect after his account sitting abuse. So basically were just playing word games with timing.lancehoch wrote:aliakber1001 wrote:yo johnnyrocket you motherfucken peace of shit.
you think your lieing makes things true. motherfucker i was never busted for anything.
i wasnt even warned bitch. why dont you stop fucking yourself in the ass and take your head out of your motherfucken ass and look at reality. bitch.. and my high score was 3519 bitch.. so go f*ck yourself. son of bitch
ali, watch the language, but JR, he is right. He has never been cited for anything cheating related.
Bones2484 wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I will find the thread later tonight. I think the key word you used is "cited" because the new rule went into effect after his account sitting abuse. So basically were just playing word games with timing.lancehoch wrote:aliakber1001 wrote:yo johnnyrocket you motherfucken peace of shit.
you think your lieing makes things true. motherfucker i was never busted for anything.
i wasnt even warned bitch. why dont you stop fucking yourself in the ass and take your head out of your motherfucken ass and look at reality. bitch.. and my high score was 3519 bitch.. so go f*ck yourself. son of bitch
ali, watch the language, but JR, he is right. He has never been cited for anything cheating related.
Actually, JR, you are mistaken. Again you are thinking your word to be gospel. Remember. You are not a mod. You do not make decisions on who is guilty and who isn't. Just because you think someone is guilty, does not make it so. You have absolutely no power over anything in regards to punishments. In fact, you have no power over anything at all. All you can do is make requests.
To save you time, here is the post in regards to Aliakber by King Achilles. viewtopic.php?f=239&t=35441&p=929366&hilit=+aliakber1001#p929366
As you can see, he was cleared of any wrong doing at that time.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thanks for the find. I kindly copied Wickeds response which was only 2 post down from King A's response.
Postby wicked » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:16 pm
Because of this situation, we've felt it's necessary to put in writing what is and isn't allowed when someone is temporarily babysitting your account. FAQ 15 has been updated to read as follows:
15. Can I let another player take a turn for me when I am away from the game?
You can, with the stipulation that the account babysitter is not your opponent in any current game and does not start or join new games (except for ongoing tournaments). It is common courtesy to announce in game chat that another player will take your turn(s) during your absence.
Please spread the word. Thanks.
Major wicked
what is highlighted in bold is what was changed. So some may argue, well its not cheating because it wasnt in the rules or some may argue its still cheating just because it wasnt specified specifically in the rules. Take sides of whatever you wish.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:King Herpes noob farming to gain points is not cheating. The games were played legit but is now against the rules.
Ali playing 2 accounts from the first turn to gain points is cheating. These games were not played legit but is now against the rules.
theres a difference.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: thegroover