Dancing Mustard Tossed From The Tower

[clapper011]

well, sorry F1fth, but I am not admin. And the reason for the 5 days delay was b/c twill had gone and ka was discussing with us the best course of action.

[hecter]

well, sorry F1fth, but I am not admin. And the reason for the 5 days delay was b/c twill had gone and ka was discussing with us the best course of action.

Let me spell this out for you as clearly as I can...

What rule did DancingMustard break? You must provide tangible evidence for this.

[F1fth]

Meh, it's better to burn out than to fade away.

And to Clapster, never said you were. All my aggressive question asking is directed toward whoever banned DM and whoever has the power to revoke that decision.

[clapper011]

how about, asking admin? As this went above my head in the ranks........ So no need to yell at me for something I have not control over hecter.

[TeeGee]

We don't have to agree with the mods or even like there decisions, but ultimately we have to live with them.
I have been a strong supporter to reinstate xtratabasco into these forums and I have also protested against allowing a known multi to register a 3rd account and pay premium on that to try and have an untarnished record on this site.

DM has a history in these forums and whilst I find him amusing most of the time, he should not be exempt from punishment. I am pretty sure that he isn't the 1st to recieve a ban for posting someone elses info on the site. If someone asked him too and he did, then he is a bigger fool than I gave him credit for. Its the old if someone told you to stick your head in a fire analogy.

And I am pretty sure he will still be able to play the games, after all isn't that what this site is meant to be about?

[hecter]

how about, asking admin? As this went above my head in the ranks........ So no need to yell at me for something I have not control over hecter.

You just said he was discussing with you guys what the best course of action would be. Not only that, but you've been going around making mod edits for a while now due to containing personal information, so clearly you know something. Explain it to us. Provide us with some evidence.

[chaosfactor]

Its a laugh a minute!

I am cracking up!!

Mustard You Donkey arsed Ijiot


In the Music Industry we call you a


MUPPET

[clapper011]

and i realize that , but i am trying to help. but I guess i wont bother , since i don't seem to be doing any good. Now with that said, I will direct all of you with questions, to forward them to
[player]king achilles[/player], [player]lackattack[/player], or [player]AndyDufresne[/player]. Thanks.

[F1fth]

how about, asking admin? As this went above my head in the ranks........ So no need to yell at me for something I have not control over hecter.

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

[clapper011]

how about, asking admin? As this went above my head in the ranks........ So no need to yell at me for something I have not control over hecter.

You just said he was discussing with you guys what the best course of action would be. Not only that, but you've been going around making mod edits for a while now due to containing personal information, so clearly you know something. Explain it to us. Provide us with some evidence.

us as in the Team CC, I did not have any advice to give him, and there fore lackattack gave him the advice.

[hecter]

and i realize that , but i am trying to help. but I guess i wont bother , since i don't seem to be doing any good. Now with that said, I will direct all of you with questions, to forward them to
[player]king achilles[/player], [player]lackattack[/player], or [player]AndyDufresne[/player]. Thanks.

You're not trying to help at all! All you've said so far is "I don't know anything, I'm just some kind of puppet for these guys." I'm only asking for one thing, one tiny little thing, and that's where it states in the rules that apply to this forum where we can't post personal information, a rule which you've, many times in the past, enforced.

EDIT: I can see NS just posted that, lot of good it did DM Enforcing rules that didn't yet exist! Good job!

[clapper011]

thats fine if you feel that way hecter. I will no longer comment on this discussion. Since "I know nothing" I shall say "nothing". Good luck with your questions.

[StiffMittens]

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=71415
So it looks like Dancing Mustard was pre-emptively banned, because they had been working on that rule for the past few weeks and just hadn't posted it yet.

[The Fuzzy Pengui]

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

You could PM them. The people locking your posts have been volunteer moderators, not administrators.

And yes, it could help to PM them, but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

[timmytuttut88]

NightStrike clearly said:

You all have been asking for clearer rules and guidelines to go by, and you WILL be getting them. We moderators have been working on writing and polishing them for several weeks now, and they will be released soon. The new clearer rule regarding personal information was already included in it. It reads:

Don't ever post personal information of other users. Anywhere. Ever. Even if they already posted it somewhere else. This includes posting personal information about a CC user on another site, you will be held accountable here.

So this is a NEW rule that hasn't yet been exstablished and is being WORKED on. Well way to go mods! This clearly violates the Ex Post Facto Laws. What are ex post facto laws you might ask?

Are statutes that make an act punishable as a crime when such an act was not an offense when committed.

At the time this "crime" was committed this "law" was not yet updated. Therefore Mustard is not guilty case closed. But since this is a private entity the mods can do as they wish and turn this into a nazi dictatorship and have clapper and nightstrike as the gestapo! I also love how any thread that is against the mods is now automatically "trolling" and is locked.

[spaceghst44]

by volunteer you mean paid right?

[timmytuttut88]

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

You could PM them. The people locking your posts have been volunteer moderators, not administrators.

And yes, it could help to PM them, but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

Yes lets send an e-ticket and not get a response in weeks! How about we cause havoc and get a response now!

[hecter]

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

You could PM them. The people locking your posts have been volunteer moderators, not administrators.

And yes, it could help to PM them, but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

Yes lets send an e-ticket and not get a response in weeks! How about we cause havoc and get a response now!

Now now, I'm sure we'll get a response in about a month or so about how we were right and they were wrong...

[hecter]

Hey, come on, they're volunteer moderators which somehow absolves them of all responsibility, or something like that...

[StiffMittens]

...but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

Yes lets send an e-ticket and not get a response in weeks! How about we cause havoc and get a response now!

Ok, but my guess is the response will be more bannings.

[Night Strike]

Actually, threads against the mods belong in Flame Wars, which is why they got moved or locked.

Also, DM had received numerous warnings regarding the posting of personal information. And as you failed to quote here, warnings by mods are supposed to be heeded as if lack had given it himself. DM failed to heed those warnings and received a vacation.

By the way, if you don't like this perceived "private nazi dictatorship", you don't have to stay. It's not like having paid money is keeping you here.

[timmytuttut88]

Well, I was hoping an admin would read my posts since they were taking the time to lock them, but should I PM them? Do you honestly think it will work even if I presented a courteous, reasonable, and sufficient case (i.e. that he broke no explicit nor implied rules) to revoke the decision?

You could PM them. The people locking your posts have been volunteer moderators, not administrators.

And yes, it could help to PM them, but an e-ticket is normally the way to go. But presenting a clear case, in a professional manner, could reverse a decision.

Hope that helps

Yes lets send an e-ticket and not get a response in weeks! How about we cause havoc and get a response now!

Now now, I'm sure we'll get a response in about a month or so about how we were right and they were wrong...

I honestly can't believe how incredibly ridiculous this is.

A one month ban
for personal info that the owner SAID to post
5 days after he deleted the info because he thought mods could mistake it for something it wasn't
which violates a rule that hasn't been made yet
on forum guildlines that are being updated

[atheistheretic]

Only vote if you have read this thread.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=71349

[timmytuttut88]

Also, DM had received numerous warnings regarding the posting of personal information. And as you failed to quote here, warnings by mods are supposed to be heeded as if lack had given it himself. DM failed to heed those warnings and received a vacation.

Yes, well would you sending the quote where you specifically say "you cannot post personal info even if the owner of the personal info says you can". Since if your so confident about it, it must have been said right?

By the way, if you don't like this perceived "private nazi dictatorship", you don't have to stay. It's not like having paid money is keeping you here.

I would, but I enjoy making you guys look bad way too much. You might not realize it, but my criticism of this site is actually helping you realize how bad the forum guildlines are! And now they are being updated which is something im happy about.

[timmytuttut88]

I think that the 100%-0% vote total is too indesicive to have any conclusions drawn from it.