[Abandoned] Research & Conquer

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

A test of how to fit the map description in the space we have

Image
Emperor_Metalman
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by Emperor_Metalman »

I'd suggest making the legend slightly bigger.
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

Emperor_Metalman wrote:I'd suggest making the legend slightly bigger.


Thanks for the advice. I used a size 7 letter. I suppose a size 8 would also work, and be more easy to read.

By the way, about the text itself. Is it understandable enough? Or does it take a bit too much effort to understand?
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: New Concept: Research (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by MrBenn »

OliverFA wrote:
MrBenn wrote:I think this map will need to utilise as much available space as possible... and that will mean using more height ;-)


Hey MrBenn. Just a small question. I have already asked at the begining of the thread. But just in order to have everything clear, ¿which size am I allowed to use for my map? Can I use the bigger dimensions? And do I have to make small and big versions, or can I just make the big version?

Thanks in advance for your answers

I know that there was some discussion about having the same-sized large/small maps when ConquerMan was in development, but cannot remember the outcome...

As far as the sizes you can use, the folliwng is taken from the mapmaking handbook:
    1. SMALL MAP: WIDTH up to 630 px; HEIGHT 600 px
    2. LARGE MAP: WIDTH up to 840 px ; HEIGHT 800 px.
    3. SIZE DIFFERENTIAL: A large map must be noticably larger than their small map; 9% larger is required but 33.3% (1/3rd) is recommended.
    4. NOTE: Mapmakers are encouraged to make their large maps smaller than the maximum size limits when possible to eliminate scrolling to attack/read the sidebar info.
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

Thanks for your answers, MrBenn, :-)

I just checked Conquer Man thread and looks like it had the 600x630 size. So I suppose that means that the small map has to be no bigger than that size.

So we'll try to fit everything in 630x600
User avatar
max is gr8
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
Location: In a big ball of light sent from the future

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by max is gr8 »

*Cough* world 2.1 *cough*, you can go over, just you need to be careful when doing so.
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

max is gr8 wrote:*Cough* world 2.1 *cough*, you can go over, just you need to be careful when doing so.


Ops! You are right. World 2.1 is 700x610 pixels. It was in front of my nose all the time and I didn't see it! Thanks for your help Max!
User avatar
ZeakCytho
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:36 pm

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by ZeakCytho »

max is gr8 wrote:*Cough* world 2.1 *cough*, you can go over, just you need to be careful when doing so.


That's not true. World 2.1 was made before the size limits were imposed and was grandfathered in.
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

ZeakCytho wrote:
max is gr8 wrote:*Cough* world 2.1 *cough*, you can go over, just you need to be careful when doing so.


That's not true. World 2.1 was made before the size limits were imposed and was grandfathered in.


Then we are in the same position as before. I suppose that some offitial word would help us in this point.
Emperor_Metalman
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by Emperor_Metalman »

OliverFA wrote:
Emperor_Metalman wrote:I'd suggest making the legend slightly bigger.


Thanks for the advice. I used a size 7 letter. I suppose a size 8 would also work, and be more easy to read.

By the way, about the text itself. Is it understandable enough? Or does it take a bit too much effort to understand?



I don't understand what you mean by +25 science points per turn.
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

Emperor_Metalman wrote:
OliverFA wrote:
Emperor_Metalman wrote:I'd suggest making the legend slightly bigger.


Thanks for the advice. I used a size 7 letter. I suppose a size 8 would also work, and be more easy to read.

By the way, about the text itself. Is it understandable enough? Or does it take a bit too much effort to understand?



I don't understand what you mean by +25 science points per turn.


It means that if you own the "Research Boost" territory (aka you have researched "Research Boost") then you get 25 armies directly deployed to that territoriy that turn.

Maybe it could be changed to: Research boost: +25 autodeploy per turn
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by yeti_c »

600x630 is maximum size of small map at the moment - you won't be allowed to go over.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

yeti_c wrote:600x630 is maximum size of small map at the moment - you won't be allowed to go over.

C.


That's clear enough. Thanks for the clarification :-)
User avatar
max is gr8
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
Location: In a big ball of light sent from the future

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by max is gr8 »

I think that World 2.1 should be re-made to comply (going to go on rant)
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
Emperor_Metalman
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by Emperor_Metalman »

OliverFA wrote:
Emperor_Metalman wrote:
OliverFA wrote:
Emperor_Metalman wrote:I'd suggest making the legend slightly bigger.


Thanks for the advice. I used a size 7 letter. I suppose a size 8 would also work, and be more easy to read.

By the way, about the text itself. Is it understandable enough? Or does it take a bit too much effort to understand?



I don't understand what you mean by +25 science points per turn.


It means that if you own the "Research Boost" territory (aka you have researched "Research Boost") then you get 25 armies directly deployed to that territoriy that turn.

Maybe it could be changed to: Research boost: +25 autodeploy per turn


That works better. Just make sure you specify which territory the autodeploy applies to
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

Hi all! Just a short post to let you know that I have not abandoned the project (and not planing to!) will share progress with you when it is ready for public disclosure. thanks :-)
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V1 P1 & 5)

Post by OliverFA »

Finally, an update!

Image

I want to apologize for the long delay. The map was ready one week ago, but it has been my busy schedulle that has prevented me from uploading it before. Don't want to bore you with personal details that you don't need to know. So to make a long story short I will just say that during this week I have started working in Madrid and have been all the week busy relocating and doing all the kind of stuff that you do when you move to another city (I previously lived in Barcelona). The good part is that things are going really well :-) the bad part is that I have less free time for Conquer Club :-(

Ok, just focusing in the subject that we all care about: I thing that the graphic artist has done a really good job here. In this version, all the 88s fit in the territories. But the addition of the 88s does not harm the atractive look that the map has. On the contrary, it makes it feel more like a final map.

I would really appreciate if you could comment about this version to help us improve it and approach the final version. In particular, we need to know where to place the impassables.

Thanks to all in advance ;)
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by MrBenn »

[Advanced Draft]
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by OliverFA »

Hey MrBenn. Sorry for asking. But... could you please tell me what I have to do with your [advanced draft] comment? If I have to do something, of course.

I apologize for not knowing in andvance. But that's my first map. You know.
Emperor_Metalman
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:45 pm

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by Emperor_Metalman »

I'd suggest removing the water around the edges of the map as it doesn't seem to have any useful function.
Also, the capital bonus should be increased.

5.3-Bombing: (Needs to be decided if this feature will be included or not)
Basic bombing would be able to attack an area on the map surrounding the capital. Advanced bombing would allow to bombard the full map."



Basic bombing should be a tech, but advanced bombing would ruin gameplay balance

6.3-Political Unrest: (Optional)
If the player loses the palace, political unrest would spread through all the empire, and would negate the effects of techs.

This is a good idea. However, there should be a tech that allows you to cause polticial unrest.
bryguy
Posts: 4381
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:50 am
Location: Lost in a Jigsaw

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by bryguy »

OliverFA wrote:Hey MrBenn. Sorry for asking. But... could you please tell me what I have to do with your [advanced draft] comment? If I have to do something, of course.

I apologize for not knowing in andvance. But that's my first map. You know.




the [advanced draft] basically means its getting closer to moving to the main foundry. Also, any stickied threads are [advanced draft], so [advanced draft] also basically seperates your thread (and other advanced draft threads) from the other drafts.
User avatar
MrBenn
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:32 am
Location: Off Duty

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by MrBenn »

bryguy wrote:
OliverFA wrote:Hey MrBenn. Sorry for asking. But... could you please tell me what I have to do with your [advanced draft] comment? If I have to do something, of course.

I apologize for not knowing in andvance. But that's my first map. You know.


the [advanced draft] basically means its getting closer to moving to the main foundry. Also, any stickied threads are [advanced draft], so [advanced draft] also basically seperates your thread (and other advanced draft threads) from the other drafts.


Bryguy hit the nail on the head... it means you're not too far from getting into the main foundry ;-)
Image
PB: 2661 | He's blue... If he were green he would die | No mod would be stupid enough to do that
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by OliverFA »

I see! Thanks to both of you for explaining that to me :-)
User avatar
OliverFA
Posts: 2295
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:30 am
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in Spain

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by OliverFA »

Hi Emperor Metalman! Thanks for your comments :-)

Emperor_Metalman wrote:I'd suggest removing the water around the edges of the map as it doesn't seem to have any useful function.
Also, the capital bonus should be increased.

5.3-Bombing: (Needs to be decided if this feature will be included or not)
Basic bombing would be able to attack an area on the map surrounding the capital. Advanced bombing would allow to bombard the full map."



Basic bombing should be a tech, but advanced bombing would ruin gameplay balance


In my opinion it does not have to ruin gameplay balance. But you are right in pointing that advanced bombing would be VERY powerful. A possible way to balance it would be to make advanced bombing very costing, with a very high research cost. If it was expensive enough, it would not ruin gameplay, as the player who commited to pay such high research cost would deserve to bombard the full map.

Anyway, I think we don't need it, because we already have enough different technologies that we don't need to repeat any of them (but we can repeat if we wish. Is just that we don't need to).

Emperor_Metalman wrote:
6.3-Political Unrest: (Optional)
If the player loses the palace, political unrest would spread through all the empire, and would negate the effects of techs.

This is a good idea. However, there should be a tech that allows you to cause polticial unrest.
[/quote]

Well, as I see it, political unrest is result of not having a palace and not the result of having a tech. I am not sure if a tech is needed here. Plus I am afraid it would be extremely difficult to code :-(

Once again, thanks for your comments :-)
User avatar
SuicidalSnowman
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:40 am
Gender: Male

Re: Research & Conquer (Working Title) (V2 P1 & 8)

Post by SuicidalSnowman »

Wow, just stumbled across this, but it sounds amazing! So creative too. I will read all the in between posts before I repeat questions already answered, but this looks so cool. :shock:
Post Reply

Return to “Recycling Box”