No - there were a lot of people involved in the block - not bust. Including some such as Prankcall who is on that list. Personally I didn't find much error on his part - maybe slight but not really worth what the ending result was. I don't think it's enough to remove him ...
No - there were a lot of people involved in the block - not bust. Including some such as Prankcall who is on that list. Personally I didn't find much error on his part - maybe slight but not really worth what the ending result was. I don't think it's enough to remove him ...
where is this info and are their any score resets??????/
No - there were a lot of people involved in the block - not bust. Including some such as Prankcall who is on that list. Personally I didn't find much error on his part - maybe slight but not really worth what the ending result was. I don't think it's enough to remove him ...
where is this info and are their any score resets??????/
No score reset - merely a block of about 15 people or so. People got blocked that weren't even involved with each other really...
Ruling by King Achillis page 7 - although more people were added to the block since then... I just have to quote Prank because although I'm not saying anything he said about Scott is true, I play in all those games with Bruce + Insom as well, I merely thought his rant was entertaining. Those are those that are blocked anyhow.
Prankcall wrote:If blocks are being handed out as they seem to be since i just got this (elistuy, KingOfGods, Paddy The Cat, maxatstuy, fantasianasian, JCKing, 300spartans, JesusReigns, phantomzero, freeroll84, dallascowboys11, assassin07, 1dominic88, maxs account, ninjaraider, krusher, BlackIrish, Brazileiro, Nom Anor, buttpirate69) those are the blocked players i cant play..which is fine i dont know half them anyways..However it seems to me that Bruce and his little BITCH ass crying about shit needs to be blocked from sucking Scott's dick all nite long that goes for Red too..I've played in to many games with Scott ,Bruce and Insomnia. Any1 that has knows exactly what im tlaking about.Go review his games and win percentage in games that they play together.They never attack him always block for him etc.It's bullshit you guys act like fucking kids and shit has to come to this.I had nothing to do with this and have recieved numerous blocks.Just shows this site is far from being un-biased and has no real order.The only order here is chaos.I see no reason i cant give my password out if i may miss a game or cant finish
Ruling by King Achillis page 7 - although more people were added to the block since then... I just have to quote Prank because although I'm not saying anything he said about Scott is true, I play in all those games with Bruce + Insom as well, I merely thought his rant was entertaining. Those are those that are blocked anyhow.
Prankcall wrote:If blocks are being handed out as they seem to be since i just got this (elistuy, KingOfGods, Paddy The Cat, maxatstuy, fantasianasian, JCKing, 300spartans, JesusReigns, phantomzero, freeroll84, dallascowboys11, assassin07, 1dominic88, maxs account, ninjaraider, krusher, BlackIrish, Brazileiro, Nom Anor, buttpirate69) those are the blocked players i cant play..which is fine i dont know half them anyways..However it seems to me that Bruce and his little BITCH ass crying about shit needs to be blocked from sucking Scott's dick all nite long that goes for Red too..I've played in to many games with Scott ,Bruce and Insomnia. Any1 that has knows exactly what im tlaking about.Go review his games and win percentage in games that they play together.They never attack him always block for him etc.It's bullshit you guys act like fucking kids and shit has to come to this.I had nothing to do with this and have recieved numerous blocks.Just shows this site is far from being un-biased and has no real order.The only order here is chaos.I see no reason i cant give my password out if i may miss a game or cant finish
FabledIntegral wrote:He was blocked - not declared a cheat Scott - if you're going by that criteria you have to remove Prankcall and KoG from that list as well.
According to mods and hunters, Maxatstuy abused account sitting privileges; to some of us that is cheating. As a result, gained points in casual double freestyle games. The extent of how many points he gained using this cheat method couldn't be determined, and the only reason he didn't receive a point reset.
EDIT: Prank and KG didn't have a cheat thread made against them. I personally wouldn't mind if they were removed, unfortunately it just appears they were bystanders. How innocent- no one knows except them. They were blocked as a result of Maxatstuy's ability to access their accounts in the future to prevent further abuse by him. A lot of good that's done.
FabledIntegral wrote:He was blocked - not declared a cheat Scott - if you're going by that criteria you have to remove Prankcall and KoG from that list as well.
According to mods and hunters, Maxatstuy abused account sitting privileges; to some of us that is cheating. As a result, gained points in casual double freestyle games. The extent of how many points he gained using this cheat method couldn't be determined, and the only reason he didn't receive a point reset.
EDIT: Prank and KG didn't have a cheat thread made against them. I personally wouldn't mind if they were removed, unfortunately it just appears they were bystanders. How innocent- no one knows except them. They were blocked as a result of Maxatstuy's ability to access their accounts in the future to prevent further abuse by him. A lot of good that's done.
Max received the exact same punishment as everyone else on that list...
I fail to see your reasoning here Fable. Are you saying that they all should be on the list or they all shouldn't be? I've already explained to you the reasoning on why Max shouldn't be. You've done nothing but repeat one fact- they were all blocked. We know this already! If you're fighting for Equal Cheat Rights, perhaps add Warsteiner to the cause as well.
Like I said earlier, elite just got less elite. It's Blitz's thread to do as he pleases. I personally don't care one way or the other.....
Scott-Land wrote:I fail to see your reasoning here Fable. Are you saying that they all should be on the list or they all shouldn't be? I've already explained to you the reasoning on why Max shouldn't be. You've done nothing but repeat one fact- they were all blocked. We know this already! If you're fighting for Equal Cheat Rights, perhaps add Warsteiner to the cause as well.
Like I said earlier, elite just got less elite. It's Blitz's thread to do as he pleases. I personally don't care one way or the other.....
As with you - I don't care much about this list - hell I didn't even make it on it, I came up short.
My point is merely if we're going to go by official rulings to dictate who should be on the list or not, then we should go by official listings. Not personal beliefs. If it was personal beliefs then someone could of thought you truly cheated with Bruce and kept you off the list simply because he thought the mods should have looked at the cases and treated you more harshly. So because Max got the exact same punishment as everyone else by the official ruling - whatever the case of what he did is irrelevant. Either everyone on that block should be prevented from making that list, or everyone should be allowed on it.
So it comes down to - is having a block with someone worthy of being prohibited from being on a list? If yes - none of them should be on it. If no - then they all should be allowed - including Max since all he got was a block.
Scott-Land wrote:I fail to see your reasoning here Fable. Are you saying that they all should be on the list or they all shouldn't be? I've already explained to you the reasoning on why Max shouldn't be. You've done nothing but repeat one fact- they were all blocked. We know this already! If you're fighting for Equal Cheat Rights, perhaps add Warsteiner to the cause as well.
Like I said earlier, elite just got less elite. It's Blitz's thread to do as he pleases. I personally don't care one way or the other.....
As with you - I don't care much about this list - hell I didn't even make it on it, I came up short.
My point is merely if we're going to go by official rulings to dictate who should be on the list or not, then we should go by official listings. Not personal beliefs. If it was personal beliefs then someone could of thought you truly cheated with Bruce and kept you off the list simply because he thought the mods should have looked at the cases and treated you more harshly. So because Max got the exact same punishment as everyone else by the official ruling - whatever the case of what he did is irrelevant. Either everyone on that block should be prevented from making that list, or everyone should be allowed on it.
So it comes down to - is having a block with someone worthy of being prohibited from being on a list? If yes - none of them should be on it. If no - then they all should be allowed - including Max since all he got was a block.
How can you compare Max's ruling equivalent to mine ? Are you a fucking idiot ? Blocked is not personal belief- there is guilt there. We are going by the mod's ruling... no where is it personal belief.
Scott-Land wrote:I fail to see your reasoning here Fable. Are you saying that they all should be on the list or they all shouldn't be? I've already explained to you the reasoning on why Max shouldn't be. You've done nothing but repeat one fact- they were all blocked. We know this already! If you're fighting for Equal Cheat Rights, perhaps add Warsteiner to the cause as well.
Like I said earlier, elite just got less elite. It's Blitz's thread to do as he pleases. I personally don't care one way or the other.....
As with you - I don't care much about this list - hell I didn't even make it on it, I came up short.
My point is merely if we're going to go by official rulings to dictate who should be on the list or not, then we should go by official listings. Not personal beliefs. If it was personal beliefs then someone could of thought you truly cheated with Bruce and kept you off the list simply because he thought the mods should have looked at the cases and treated you more harshly. So because Max got the exact same punishment as everyone else by the official ruling - whatever the case of what he did is irrelevant. Either everyone on that block should be prevented from making that list, or everyone should be allowed on it.
So it comes down to - is having a block with someone worthy of being prohibited from being on a list? If yes - none of them should be on it. If no - then they all should be allowed - including Max since all he got was a block.
How can you compare Max's ruling equivalent to mine ? Are you a fucking idiot ? Blocked is not personal belief- there is guilt there. We are going by the mod's ruling... no where is it personal belief.
Christ Scott learn to read what I said. I said IF we are using BLOCKS as a sign of guilt - that's FINE and Max SHOULD NOT be allowed on the list. But if he ISN'T allowed them NEITHER should Prank/KoG.
It depends on the criteria on what's guilty or not. Not everyone would agree a block = guilt. That's what I was debating. KoG and Prank both got blocks yet you aren't complaining they are in the thread. I understand the difference in situation between max vs prank/kog yet the difference in situation IS personal belief - the end result is a block with them nonetheless, which is the official ruling. THAT is my point.
So if you're using personal belief to say max is guilty and prank/kog are innocent, then what's to stop someone from having the personal belief that the mods are WRONG and you are guilty and they came to the wrong conclusion so you shouldn't be on the thread.
I'm going to ask you one more time because honestly this conversation is getting no where and beginning to get on my nerves.
I have an email [from a mod] stating that Max abused account sitting rules; violated a CC rule. Is that cheating ? Has nothing to do with my personal beliefs- that's what ignore lists are for.
I have no facts on Prank or KG- hence the reason I didn't comment..... I suggest you do the same.
Scott-Land wrote:I'm going to ask you one more time because honestly this conversation is getting no where and beginning to get on my nerves.
I have an email stating that Max abused account sitting rules; violated a CC rule. Is that cheating ? Has nothing to do with my personal beliefs- that's what ignore lists are for.
Do you at least understand my points on the situation? My question is WHAT is the criteria to determine someone being ineligible for the list? Does the line somehow fall in between violating a CC rule but not getting busted + getting a block vs just getting a block?
You're the one that brought up that the thread has lost some value or something of that sort... I was merely responding to you. I'm completely neutral on the situation with Max. As I said - whether he's on it or not isn't my concern, I'm just debating with you the criteria on where the line is to make you ineligible. And before you say something like "cheating," does that mean getting a block does NOT mean you cheated? And they are completely different?
Scott-Land wrote:I'm going to ask you one more time because honestly this conversation is getting no where and beginning to get on my nerves.
I have an email [from a mod] stating that Max abused account sitting rules; violated a CC rule. Is that cheating ? Has nothing to do with my personal beliefs- that's what ignore lists are for.
I have no facts on Prank or KG- hence the reason I didn't comment..... I suggest you do the same.
CC needs to do a score reset then or something, also this happened to skyt and warsteiner about abuse of babysitting account. I dont like all of it either, but, i usually go with what CC says, if there was no score reset by CC, hard for me to take his score away, agreed?
Blitzaholic wrote: CC needs to do a score reset then or something, also this happened to skyt and warsteiner about abuse of babysitting account. I dont like all of it either, but, i usually go with what CC says, if there was no score reset by CC, hard for me to take his score away, agreed?
fyi- SkyT was never blocked. But I honestly don't care... you won't see me bring it up again.