NatNat wrote:why didn't u do london metro
because i'm an aussie

m=0
Moderator: Cartographers
NatNat wrote:why didn't u do london metro



 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		 danfrank
				danfrank
			



















 
		Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?


 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		danfrank wrote:This map is cool and plays great ... a well balanced game in four player sequential where best strategy wins over.. Great Job!!!!



 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?
That's correct


 Gilligan
				Gilligan
			
































 
		Gilligan wrote:cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?
That's correct
How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?



 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		

 Bones2484
				Bones2484
			

















 
		cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:cairnswk wrote:Gilligan wrote:I thought the freeways were not impassable to buses?
That's correct
How come Northbridge can't attack Nth Sydney?
Ah Gilligan, because it is designed that way



 Gilligan
				Gilligan
			
































 
		Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?

 Bones2484
				Bones2484
			

















 
		Bones2484 wrote:Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.

 edbeard
				edbeard
			







 
		edbeard wrote:Bones2484 wrote:Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.
the wording could probably use a tinker.
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.

 Bones2484
				Bones2484
			

















 
		
 edbeard
				edbeard
			







 
		

 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		edbeard wrote:Bones2484 wrote:Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.
the wording could probably use a tinker.
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.


 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		cairnswk wrote:edbeard wrote:Bones2484 wrote:Gilligan wrote:Northbridge is a bus. Then there is a freeway separating that from Nth Sydney. According to the map, shouldn't those be able to attack each other?
The map also says that bus stations can attack other bus stations. This is the intent of the statement about freeways.
the wording could probably use a tinker.
I'd remove the "(except for buses)" portion of that part of the legend to avoid confusion. The buses can attack other buses (or however it is phrased) is satisfactory on that end.
Agreed. and understood, i'll upload the new images to lackattack now.



 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.


 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		yeti_c wrote:edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!
C.



 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		cairnswk wrote:yeti_c wrote:edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!
C.
Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.
 
   
   
  

 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		yeti_c wrote:cairnswk wrote:yeti_c wrote:edbeard wrote:just removing the "(except for buses)" portion is more than satisfactory. the changes you suggested to the lower right legend don't do anything except add more words.
Hmmm - hate to say "I told you so"...!!
C.
Thanks C for your wisdom and the reminder that you were correct. However some of us older folk don't necessarily see things until experience teaches a lesson.
That's OK old man!!!!!


C.
 you cheeky sausage
 you cheeky sausage

 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		


 barterer2002
				barterer2002
			

























 
			
 Bones2484
				Bones2484
			

















 
		Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?


 cairnswk
				cairnswk
			








 
		cairnswk wrote:Bones2484 wrote:As I said a few days ago, I like the map but I'm still rather curious as to why Olympic Park is completely separated from the rest of the territories that make up the same bonus?
let's just say its a simple "twist"

 edbeard
				edbeard
			







 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users