[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Bruceswar wrote:Maybe the door is needed? What if it had not been a game link masked, but a porn site or site which contained a virus. Personally I think this is a pretty serious offense. As in our business we own we have a saying. "All customers make us happy, some by entering, and others by leaving"
As i said, i have already received a warning for this and a chat ban; if you think this is such a big thing - how about we just cut out [url][/url] altogether eh? Its used all the time, learn to look down before clicking. I post 1 link, 1 link, and you start wanting to perma ban me and think that i can get my hands on a virus or post porn somewhere. Seriously, get a grip.
Oh com on people it was a joke he was told not to he got a warning he is sorry ain't ya t_o_m won't do it to anyone who is not a friend anymore right This site and a lot of the people on here are getting to be real uptight take that chip outta your butt and it won't break You all have to admit it is funny he had a little fun let it die
04:42:40 ‹apey› uhoh
04:42:40 ‹ronc8649› uhoh
iAmCaffeine: 4/28/2016. I love how the PL players are getting wet on your wall
Incandenza wrote:I would say that behavior like this would count as being intentionally disruptive, not to mention being a total fucking jackass. Want to get a game together? Callouts is that-a-way. Fooling someone into joining a waterloo 1v1? That's your idea of funny? And if your only defense is "there's nowhere in the guidelines that strictly word-for-word says that it's against the rules", well, that line of reasoning has been used by every cheat and troll and jackass this site has ever seen.
Simple solution here: disable BBC code from tom's account, permanently if he keeps doing it.
I totally 100% agree. Not cool at all. Joke or not.
While I agree it was disruptive I ended up getting 26 points and he apologized to me, and after my first turn i really didn't care. It's just a game people
qeee1 wrote:I do think you guys are overreacting...
willis wrote:While I agree it was disruptive I ended up getting 26 points and he apologized to me, and after my first turn i really didn't care. It's just a game people
Bruceswar's reaction: Oh no that link to a game could include porn of some kind which i am allergic to or it could even be a virus that tom made!!
Hotdoggie wrote:lmao I think its brill. Somebody got tricked into ONE game...boohoo...just DB it if you feel that strongly else be a man, suck it up and kick the tricksters ass!
my thoughts exactly...check this game out...Game 2934291...got me 39 pts...justice well served...finally a high ranking player with the balls to accept a game from anyone who reads the forum...no other high ranking player does that...I bet nobody who is bashing him would play me becuase they dont want to lose points...t-o-m is a genuis...and hilarious...bravo
Hotdoggie wrote:lmao I think its brill. Somebody got tricked into ONE game...boohoo...just DB it if you feel that strongly else be a man, suck it up and kick the tricksters ass!
my thoughts exactly...check this game out...Game 2934291...got me 39 pts...justice well served...finally a high ranking player with the balls to accept a game from anyone who reads the forum...no other high ranking player does that...I bet nobody who is bashing him would play me becuase they dont want to lose points...t-o-m is a genuis...and hilarious...bravo
Night Strike wrote:The real problem is that this site is built around a player getting to choose who they play against and where they play those games. By posting those links, that is taking that option out of all the players who are involved in the game. Links like that tend to incite anger and flaming, which counts as trolling, which is not allowed on this forum.
Incandenza wrote:I would say that behavior like this would count as being intentionally disruptive, not to mention being a total fucking jackass. Want to get a game together? Callouts is that-a-way. Fooling someone into joining a waterloo 1v1? That's your idea of funny? And if your only defense is "there's nowhere in the guidelines that strictly word-for-word says that it's against the rules", well, that line of reasoning has been used by every cheat and troll and jackass this site has ever seen.
Simple solution here: disable BBC code from tom's account, permanently if he keeps doing it.
I thought these posts were worth a second read for those of you who are defending his actions.
Donkey wrote:I thought these posts were worth a second read for those of you who are defending his actions.
t-o-m wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:Maybe the door is needed? What if it had not been a game link masked, but a porn site or site which contained a virus. Personally I think this is a pretty serious offense. As in our business we own we have a saying. "All customers make us happy, some by entering, and others by leaving"
As i said, i have already received a warning for this and a chat ban; if you think this is such a big thing - how about we just cut out [url][/url] altogether eh? Its used all the time, learn to look down before clicking. I post 1 link, 1 link, and you start wanting to perma ban me and think that i can get my hands on a virus or post porn somewhere. Seriously, get a grip.
Night Strike wrote:The real problem is that this site is built around a player getting to choose who they play against and where they play those games. By posting those links, that is taking that option out of all the players who are involved in the game. Links like that tend to incite anger and flaming, which counts as trolling, which is not allowed on this forum.
Incandenza wrote:I would say that behavior like this would count as being intentionally disruptive, not to mention being a total fucking jackass. Want to get a game together? Callouts is that-a-way. Fooling someone into joining a waterloo 1v1? That's your idea of funny? And if your only defense is "there's nowhere in the guidelines that strictly word-for-word says that it's against the rules", well, that line of reasoning has been used by every cheat and troll and jackass this site has ever seen.
Simple solution here: disable BBC code from tom's account, permanently if he keeps doing it.
I thought these posts were worth a second read for those of you who are defending his actions.
yes ass i have read them...it was a practical joke...pull the stick out of your arse and get over it...it was funny...didnt hurt anyone...didnt abuse anyone...just set up a game...
t-o-m wrote:As i said, i have already received a warning for this and a chat ban; if you think this is such a big thing - how about we just cut out [url][/url] altogether eh? Its used all the time, learn to look down before clicking. I post 1 link, 1 link, and you start wanting to perma ban me and think that i can get my hands on a virus or post porn somewhere. Seriously, get a grip.
I thought plenty before I posted, t-o-o-l, I wanted your little friends to re-think having your back. Why should everyone here pay for your actions? You would have them take away BBC code from mature CCers because the kiddies can't be trusted to use it in a reasonble manner? I hardly think that's fair to the rest of us...
If you want to act like a child, go do it somewhere else.
it's not always what a person did but what they've done before. tom is notoriously disruptive and immature (please don't send me another pm. it's nothing personal. you haven't offended me. it's just true).
I don't put him on my ignore list because he posts in the foundry and that'd be annoying to have to click 'view this post' every time he was posting in some map thread. he can be a good guy but much of the time he's not.
he obviously can't help himself because he's been banned and warned numerous times. once you've gotten to this point, anything minor you do becomes magnified. that's just how I see it. there should be no tolerance.
t-o-m wrote:As i said, i have already received a warning for this and a chat ban; if you think this is such a big thing - how about we just cut out [url][/url] altogether eh? Its used all the time, learn to look down before clicking. I post 1 link, 1 link, and you start wanting to perma ban me and think that i can get my hands on a virus or post porn somewhere. Seriously, get a grip.
I thought plenty before I posted, t-o-o-l, I wanted your little friends to re-think having your back. Why should everyone here pay for your actions? You would have them take away BBC code from mature CCers because the kiddies can't be trusted to use it in a reasonble manner? I hardly think that's fair to the rest of us...
Listen to this as this is the last time i will say it.
I did it one time, on a friend, and a few times on chat - which i have been punished for and they were to friends, so you can hardly go around saying that i use BCC codes in an unreasonable mannor when i am using them to contribe to the community. This is not affecting everybody, is it? Name me the people affected, and name the people affected who are friends and who dont mind. You find that no one cares out of the people who i did it to. Why do you care? Do your homework before you go into a thread making unsupported accusations.
Night Strike wrote:The real problem is that this site is built around a player getting to choose who they play against and where they play those games. By posting those links, that is taking that option out of all the players who are involved in the game. Links like that tend to incite anger and flaming, which counts as trolling, which is not allowed on this forum.
Incandenza wrote:I would say that behavior like this would count as being intentionally disruptive, not to mention being a total fucking jackass. Want to get a game together? Callouts is that-a-way. Fooling someone into joining a waterloo 1v1? That's your idea of funny? And if your only defense is "there's nowhere in the guidelines that strictly word-for-word says that it's against the rules", well, that line of reasoning has been used by every cheat and troll and jackass this site has ever seen.
Simple solution here: disable BBC code from tom's account, permanently if he keeps doing it.
I thought these posts were worth a second read for those of you who are defending his actions.
that'll do donkey that'll do sorry couldn't resist
04:42:40 ‹apey› uhoh
04:42:40 ‹ronc8649› uhoh
iAmCaffeine: 4/28/2016. I love how the PL players are getting wet on your wall
t-o-m wrote:As i said, i have already received a warning for this and a chat ban; if you think this is such a big thing - how about we just cut out [url][/url] altogether eh? Its used all the time, learn to look down before clicking. I post 1 link, 1 link, and you start wanting to perma ban me and think that i can get my hands on a virus or post porn somewhere. Seriously, get a grip.
I thought plenty before I posted, t-o-o-l, I wanted your little friends to re-think having your back. Why should everyone here pay for your actions? You would have them take away BBC code from mature CCers because the kiddies can't be trusted to use it in a reasonble manner? I hardly think that's fair to the rest of us...
Listen to this as this is the last time i will say it.
I did it one time, on a friend, and a few times on chat - which i have been punished for and they were to friends, so you can hardly go around saying that i use BCC codes in an unreasonable mannor when i am using them to contribe to the community. This is not affecting everybody, is it? Name me the people affected, and name the people affected who are friends and who dont mind. You find that no one cares out of the people who i did it to. Why do you care? Do your homework before you go into a thread making unsupported accusations.
dam I wish that link had been a join game link...wudda made this thread even more funny than it already is and its pretty priceless atm.
The point is not so much about this "1" time link as t-o-m puts it. If this was his first time to do anything than we could all let it go, but it is not. He has been in trouble many times, with forum bans etc. When will he learn? Maybe never but who knows. If I was lack I know what I would do.
Hmmmm....t-o-m is an outstanding member of The Untouchables Clan and is moderator of our whole external forums. Which has over 25 very very active posters. Even here on CC he is always trying to help others. His contributions in the foundry shouldnt be ignored either! He is a goood member of the CC community and im quite sure his actions had no malice in them.
He hasnt specifically broken any concrete rules here but i would say it wasnt a very wise thing he done. Lets remember that boys will boys and the older players among you should back of just a little bit.
I ask of tom to refrain from posting such links because you may upset the players involved. But after all it hasnt brken any rules and really isnt such a big time. Sometimes, you need to step back and remember this is only a game! No hardship was done to any involved!
RjBeals wrote:Tom.. I know your young but I expected more from you.
(Actually, it's something I would have done a few years back. I got a warning from Wicked, my mistress, for posting an indirect link to 2 girls & 1 cup). I should have printed that PM, cause there will be none like it....
i think thats different...and if u only got warned for posting 2 girls 1 cup thats bs u should of been perma banned for that as for tom i think people are over reacting u should learn from all the rick rolling and gear to always check links first properties is your friend its just a harmless practical joke....yer mature but who cares...move on from it... or do u all want your mummy to hold your hand each time u click a link
hulmey wrote:Hmmmm....t-o-m is an outstanding member of The Untouchables Clan and is moderator of our whole external forums. Which has over 25 very very active posters. Even here on CC he is always trying to help others. His contributions in the foundry shouldnt be ignored either! He is a goood member of the CC community and im quite sure his actions had no malice in them.
He hasnt specifically broken any concrete rules here but i would say it wasnt a very wise thing he done. Lets remember that boys will boys and the older players among you should back of just a little bit.
I ask of tom to refrain from posting such links because you may upset the players involved. But after all it hasnt brken any rules and really isnt such a big time. Sometimes, you need to step back and remember this is only a game! No hardship was done to any involved!
I would also like to mention that one of these members is the_fuzzy_pengui who has spoke to tom about it
What I'm hearing: *it wasn't against the rules *I only did it a few times *I only did it to friends *I've already been warned
What I'm not hearing *I totally see your point *it was a douchy thing to do *I'll never do it again
For everyone on the "it was all in good fun" side, I say that there are certain interweb behaviors that need to be discouraged, and this is one of them. Intentionally false links make baby jesus cry (and before anyone says "oh it's just like a rickroll", last time I checked I only lost a few minutes to a rickroll, rather than points and quite a bit more time). The utter lack of remorse or repentance makes it worse.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM
Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
What I'm hearing: *it wasn't against the rules *I only did it a few times *I only did it to friends *I've already been warned
What I'm not hearing *I totally see your point *it was a douchy thing to do *I'll never do it again
For everyone on the "it was all in good fun" side, I say that there are certain interweb behaviors that need to be discouraged, and this is one of them. Intentionally false links make baby jesus cry (and before anyone says "oh it's just like a rickroll", last time I checked I only lost a few minutes to a rickroll, rather than points and quite a bit more time). The utter lack of remorse or repentance makes it worse.
oh noez loss of points
guys its not real life. You havent lost money or anything like that and if your such a good player youll be able to win on most settings and will get the points back anyway.
Incandenza wrote:The utter lack of remorse or repentance makes it worse.
C.
It seems your all out to get tom. Who was the trick played on coz i would very much like to speak to him before jumping to conclusions! Was this between friends? Was it some random bloke that got knobbbed.
Those issues really depend on remorse and repentance! Lets not make a mountain out of a molehill as usual