TaylorSandbek wrote:I think it makes it interesting.
to me it goes against the spirit of the option and is something that the petty do with the new feedback system(which I will love when implemented) it will be hard to warn about an individual like this and other may actually reward there petty treachery, I really feel something should be done to deter it IE the no open chat in these game(of course teamate could chat) and even more extreme a possibilty no PM's between those in active FOW as opponents...
That makes no sense your blind not mute! Quit trying to change the rules of the game just because someone gave you up. I have played games when everyone gave up the players with bonuses. They could just as easy lie as well so act on your own risk. You just have to learn to play with the posiblity of it.
The Society of Cooks Train a cook today battle an officer tomorrow! Making good players great! viewtopic.php?f=341&t=74468
TaylorSandbek wrote:I think it makes it interesting.
to me it goes against the spirit of the option and is something that the petty do with the new feedback system(which I will love when implemented) it will be hard to warn about an individual like this and other may actually reward there petty treachery, I really feel something should be done to deter it IE the no open chat in these game(of course teamate could chat) and even more extreme a possibilty no PM's between those in active FOW as opponents...
That makes no sense your blind not mute! Quit trying to change the rules of the game just because someone gave you up. I have played games when everyone gave up the players with bonuses. They could just as easy lie as well so act on your own risk. You just have to learn to play with the posiblity of it.
Again it goes against the spirit of the Game Option, based on your post you sound like one of the petty indiviuals who in a fit of rage at being out maneuvered and eliminated discloses the information. Even if you are not This mentality is prevelant with a lot of individuals here and it is saddening that concepts like good sportsmanship fairplay and honor are disipating from our society...
That sucks that someone gave you up in a FOW game. But not being able to pm those people your playing with would suck too. but like you said... they will always find a way. so... f*ck it.
TaylorSandbek wrote:I think it makes it interesting.
to me it goes against the spirit of the option and is something that the petty do with the new feedback system(which I will love when implemented) it will be hard to warn about an individual like this and other may actually reward there petty treachery, I really feel something should be done to deter it IE the no open chat in these game(of course teamate could chat) and even more extreme a possibilty no PM's between those in active FOW as opponents...
That makes no sense your blind not mute! Quit trying to change the rules of the game just because someone gave you up. I have played games when everyone gave up the players with bonuses. They could just as easy lie as well so act on your own risk. You just have to learn to play with the posiblity of it.
Again it goes against the spirit of the Game Option, based on your post you sound like one of the petty indiviuals who in a fit of rage at being out maneuvered and eliminated discloses the information. Even if you are not This mentality is prevelant with a lot of individuals here and it is saddening that concepts like good sportsmanship fairplay and honor are disipating from our society...
LOL you don't even have a clue who I am or how I play or you would not say that. Suck it up cupcake it's not against the rules. That's all I was saying.
The Society of Cooks Train a cook today battle an officer tomorrow! Making good players great! viewtopic.php?f=341&t=74468
TaylorSandbek wrote:I think it makes it interesting.
to me it goes against the spirit of the option and is something that the petty do with the new feedback system(which I will love when implemented) it will be hard to warn about an individual like this and other may actually reward there petty treachery, I really feel something should be done to deter it IE the no open chat in these game(of course teamate could chat) and even more extreme a possibilty no PM's between those in active FOW as opponents...
That makes no sense your blind not mute! Quit trying to change the rules of the game just because someone gave you up. I have played games when everyone gave up the players with bonuses. They could just as easy lie as well so act on your own risk. You just have to learn to play with the posiblity of it.
Again it goes against the spirit of the Game Option, based on your post you sound like one of the petty indiviuals who in a fit of rage at being out maneuvered and eliminated discloses the information. Even if you are not This mentality is prevelant with a lot of individuals here and it is saddening that concepts like good sportsmanship fairplay and honor are disipating from our society...
LOL you don't even have a clue who I am or how I play or you would not say that. Suck it up cupcake it's not against the rules. That's all I was saying.
Again you miss the point I am speaking about against the spirit of the rule/option and that there should be some type of changes to address it so as to eliminate that problem I have suggessted many things that would deter it and I did not say all would have to be placed to make it work the minimum I would say would be limit the game chat and you would see less of problem from there...
hulmey wrote:its part of the game!! now wether the other person/s choose's to listen to this player is another matter.....
its abit like poker, when someone announces in chat what cards they have!!
Since when was it a part of the game to intentionally disclose after being eliminated when in all likely hood the people would never have known your strength nor ventured for fear of exposing themselves...It is a petty retalitory thing to do and there should be steps made to limit that kind of flagrant poorsportsmanship and abuse...
Soloman wrote:Since when was it a part of the game to intentionally disclose after being eliminated when in all likely hood the people would never have known your strength nor ventured for fear of exposing themselves...It is a petty retalitory thing to do and there should be steps made to limit that kind of flagrant poorsportsmanship and abuse...
Would you consider it OK if a player still in the game disclosed yours (or anyones) location???
Soloman wrote:Since when was it a part of the game to intentionally disclose after being eliminated when in all likely hood the people would never have known your strength nor ventured for fear of exposing themselves...It is a petty retalitory thing to do and there should be steps made to limit that kind of flagrant poorsportsmanship and abuse...
Would you consider it OK if a player still in the game disclosed yours (or anyones) location???
refer back to earlier post about limiting game chat to teams...
Soloman wrote:Since when was it a part of the game to intentionally disclose after being eliminated when in all likely hood the people would never have known your strength nor ventured for fear of exposing themselves...It is a petty retalitory thing to do and there should be steps made to limit that kind of flagrant poorsportsmanship and abuse...
Would you consider it OK if a player still in the game disclosed yours (or anyones) location???
i know its one of the elemnets of the game, so im not going to cry about it!!
yeah.. but to be fair to the OP, he is talking about people giving up info AFTER they are eliminated... not during the course of play... so, you eliminate a dude, and he drops a dime on where you are and what you have. i see the point, but there isnt' a rule against it. so, instead of getting beaten up here, perhaps you should take a better worded complaint/thread to the suggestions forum, where people might be a little kinder and gentler. this GD crowd is growing callous from all the continual threads complaining about aspects of the rules that have been discussed countless times before (not saying you are complaining!!). so, i understand your point, it is pissy and immature and vindictive, but this is the wrong forum and crowd for a mature discourse on a rules change... know what i'm sayin'?-0
p.s.-crossing my fingers that the witch hunters don't deem this off topic and send me to exile along with jbrettlip_obama...
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
owenshooter wrote:yeah.. but to be fair to the OP, he is talking about people giving up info AFTER they are eliminated... not during the course of play... so, you eliminate a dude, and he drops a dime on where you are and what you have. i see the point, but there isnt' a rule against it. so, instead of getting beaten up here, perhaps you should take a better worded complaint/thread to the suggestions forum, where people might be a little kinder and gentler. this GD crowd is growing callous from all the continual threads complaining about aspects of the rules that have been discussed countless times before (not saying you are complaining!!). so, i understand your point, it is pissy and immature and vindictive, but this is the wrong forum and crowd for a mature discourse on a rules change... know what i'm sayin'?-0
p.s.-crossing my fingers that the witch hunters don't deem this off topic and send me to exile along with jbrettlip_obama...
same happens in poker, it sucks but what can you do! leave a negative so that you can warn others!
owenshooter wrote:yeah.. but to be fair to the OP, he is talking about people giving up info AFTER they are eliminated... not during the course of play... so, you eliminate a dude, and he drops a dime on where you are and what you have. i see the point, but there isnt' a rule against it. so, instead of getting beaten up here, perhaps you should take a better worded complaint/thread to the suggestions forum, where people might be a little kinder and gentler. this GD crowd is growing callous from all the continual threads complaining about aspects of the rules that have been discussed countless times before (not saying you are complaining!!). so, i understand your point, it is pissy and immature and vindictive, but this is the wrong forum and crowd for a mature discourse on a rules change... know what i'm sayin'?-0
p.s.-crossing my fingers that the witch hunters don't deem this off topic and send me to exile along with jbrettlip_obama...
NO you are right subject Owen and I am used to the hate and trolling on the issues presented I was hoping for legitimate disscussion on the matter and placed here in General for the significant difference in traffic. I wanted to build a heated buzz before taking it to the graveyard known as suggestions bug report where only a few other grave robbers continually post. things are largely untouched and unsorted down there and if there ever going to be a point where mods view and comment it is more likely up here in GD. SO this is not just a whine post but rather an attempt at disscussion for conctructive criticism and support so I can post a well rounded suggesstion that will actually get addressed in a timely matter(even if it is rejected to have no response just sucks majorly) so please contiue the debate and the random hate trolling just reups its postion so I do not mind that either...
