Moderator: Community Team
suggs wrote:More sex please.
No, I am suggesting that LAWS are not the best way to limit pogroms. I don't "advocate" pogroms at all, except when medically necessary or adviseable. AND, I think the individuals, along with their local business owners pissed off by local jewery and their anti-semite clergy are much, much better at deciding what is "medically necessary" than congress or you or I sitting here, without all the information about the case.
When you make pogroms illegal, you don't eliminate then. Particularly when you also limit education. You drive them underground, where you often end up losing BOTH the life of the jew AND the neo-Nazi ... not to mention any children that neo-Nazi might have in the future...
ALSO, you need to look a bit more into how pogroms, random deportations et al. are all historically used by GOVERNMENTS to control a population by finding a scapegoat before you so blithely dismiss this as anti-semites "just deciding" to go on a killing spree.
Again, I do NOT agree with pogroms (except for medical reasons), BUT I DO advocate education rather than legislation.
And, if one thing has been made absolutely clear by your many posts, it is how very badly we need REAL, mandatory, sex/abstinance education (the goal is to teach responsibility but through real information, not lies and not religious lessons to which only some subscribe). YOU have obviously NOT had it
Napoleon Ier wrote:Yes, I fucking have! And because of pathetically limp-wristed starry-eyed do-gooders like you imagining your grand social visions and imposing your ridiculous sex-ed schemes on schools, I have my time, which could be spent contributing towards getting me into a decent university or actually learning something useful, I end having to sit there whilst some fugly cretin of a woman talks to me in a nasal, whinny voice about abstinence (can't have been hard for her...) and how I should always use a condom. To which I ask whether I should also wear wellies in the bath, but that's irrelevant. Point is; you don't really need education. Yes, the darkies in Nbogo-congo land might, what with their "have sex with a avirgin to cure AIDS" schemes, but here in the West; I think we've understood the mechanics of sexual intercourse. We really don't need to be told about the birds and the bees repeatedly, over an entire afternoon once every month.
Neoteny wrote:Nappy's a bigot! Whee!
PLAYER57832 wrote:No, I am suggesting that LAWS are not the best way to limit abortions.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Neoteny wrote:Nappy's a bigot! Whee!
NEWSFLASH: POPE CLAIMS HIS BELIEF IN GOD "STILL STRONG"
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Napoleon Ier wrote:
Yes, I fucking have! And because of pathetically limp-wristed starry-eyed do-gooders like you imagining your grand social visions and imposing your ridiculous sex-ed schemes on schools, I have my time, which could be spent contributing towards getting me into a decent university or actually learning something useful, I end having to sit there whilst some fugly cretin of a woman talks to me in a nasal, whinny voice about abstinence (can't have been hard for her...) and how I should always use a condom. To which I ask whether I should also wear wellies in the bath, but that's irrelevant. Point is; you don't really need education. Yes, the darkies in Nbogo-congo land might, what with their "have sex with a avirgin to cure AIDS" schemes, but here in the West; I think we've understood the mechanics of sexual intercourse. We really don't need to be told about the birds and the bees repeatedly, over an entire afternoon once every month.
tzor wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:No, I am suggesting that LAWS are not the best way to limit abortions.
I would disagee here. LAWS are not the best way to eliminate abortions. LAWS are the best way to limit abortions, especially the most extreeme cases where alternates are available and to ensure that the "right" of an abortion doesn't trump established prodedures in law and medicine.
Snorri1234 wrote:tzor wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:No, I am suggesting that LAWS are not the best way to limit abortions.
I would disagee here. LAWS are not the best way to eliminate abortions. LAWS are the best way to limit abortions, especially the most extreeme cases where alternates are available and to ensure that the "right" of an abortion doesn't trump established prodedures in law and medicine.
Actually, no, the best way too limit abortions is telling kids how to prevent getting pregnant. And not by the ridiculous abstinence-only education that is common as kids are going to motherfucking do it anyway. Shit, if anything not talking about it makes them wanna do it more.
tzor wrote:especially the most extreeme cases where alternates are available and to ensure that the "right" of an abortion doesn't trump established prodedures in law and medicine.
PLAYER57832 wrote: Abstinance DOES increase with good education. Why? because most teens DO know they are not ready to be parents.
And, will add that the Roman Catholic Church is one of the staunchest opponents to both ANY form of birth control (except rythm, for married folks)
Lollercaust.Snorri1234 wrote:they have said that condom-usage is not neccesarily bad a few years ago. (At least, if the priest and the altar-boy don't know eachother very well.)
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
jiminski wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:
Yes, I fucking have! And because of pathetically limp-wristed starry-eyed do-gooders like you imagining your grand social visions and imposing your ridiculous sex-ed schemes on schools, I have my time, which could be spent contributing towards getting me into a decent university or actually learning something useful, I end having to sit there whilst some fugly cretin of a woman talks to me in a nasal, whinny voice about abstinence (can't have been hard for her...) and how I should always use a condom. To which I ask whether I should also wear wellies in the bath, but that's irrelevant. Point is; you don't really need education. Yes, the darkies in Nbogo-congo land might, what with their "have sex with a avirgin to cure AIDS" schemes, but here in the West; I think we've understood the mechanics of sexual intercourse. We really don't need to be told about the birds and the bees repeatedly, over an entire afternoon once every month.
By Christ Nappy needs a shag!
Napoleon Ier wrote:jiminski wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:
Yes, I fucking have! And because of pathetically limp-wristed starry-eyed do-gooders like you imagining your grand social visions and imposing your ridiculous sex-ed schemes on schools, I have my time, which could be spent contributing towards getting me into a decent university or actually learning something useful, I end having to sit there whilst some fugly cretin of a woman talks to me in a nasal, whinny voice about abstinence (can't have been hard for her...) and how I should always use a condom. To which I ask whether I should also wear wellies in the bath, but that's irrelevant. Point is; you don't really need education. Yes, the darkies in Nbogo-congo land might, what with their "have sex with a avirgin to cure AIDS" schemes, but here in the West; I think we've understood the mechanics of sexual intercourse. We really don't need to be told about the birds and the bees repeatedly, over an entire afternoon once every month.
By Christ Nappy needs a shag!
Hmm. But unlike you, he can actually easily get one from a hot blonde with massive knockers, whilst you fork out £40 for an hour of fun with a phillippino ladyboy.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Napoleon Ier wrote:jiminski wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:
Yes, I fucking have! And because of pathetically limp-wristed starry-eyed do-gooders like you imagining your grand social visions and imposing your ridiculous sex-ed schemes on schools, I have my time, which could be spent contributing towards getting me into a decent university or actually learning something useful, I end having to sit there whilst some fugly cretin of a woman talks to me in a nasal, whinny voice about abstinence (can't have been hard for her...) and how I should always use a condom. To which I ask whether I should also wear wellies in the bath, but that's irrelevant. Point is; you don't really need education. Yes, the darkies in Nbogo-congo land might, what with their "have sex with a avirgin to cure AIDS" schemes, but here in the West; I think we've understood the mechanics of sexual intercourse. We really don't need to be told about the birds and the bees repeatedly, over an entire afternoon once every month.
By Christ Nappy needs a shag!
Hmm. But unlike you, he can actually easily get one from a hot blonde with massive knockers, whilst you fork out £40 for an hour of fun with a phillippino ladyboy.
Snorri1234 wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:And, will add that the Roman Catholic Church is one of the staunchest opponents to both ANY form of birth control (except rythm, for married folks)
Well I think they have said that condom-usage is not neccesarily bad a few years ago. (At least, if the priest and the altar-boy don't know eachother very well.)
suggs wrote:Or you could leave the cult, and think for yourself.
suggs wrote:Or you could leave the cult, and think for yourself.
muy_thaiguy wrote:suggs wrote:Or you could leave the cult, and think for yourself.
Yes you could leave your cult suggs.
jonesthecurl wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:suggs wrote:Or you could leave the cult, and think for yourself.
Yes you could leave your cult suggs.
The Cult of Suggs - I guess the acolytes don't wear saffron robes and finger bells to accost strangers in the street.
Suggs-gestions?
Snorri1234 wrote:tzor wrote:I would disagee here. LAWS are not the best way to eliminate abortions. LAWS are the best way to limit abortions ...
Actually, no, the best way too limit abortions is telling kids how to prevent getting pregnant.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap, jusplay4fun