Moderator: Community Team
London Communist wrote:cmckinney's avatar looks similiar to unriggables.
DaGip wrote:Norse wrote:The truth!!
t-o-m wrote:DaGip wrote:Norse wrote:The truth!!
did norse have sumin against clapper?
DAZMCFC wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^now that is unfair. he treats women the same as men.^^^^^^^^^^^
Frigidus wrote:t-o-m wrote:DaGip wrote:Norse wrote:The truth!!
did norse have sumin against clapper?
She was a woman.
gdeangel wrote:Well... I figured I should read some of this crap.
Some of the posts were funny. And to the extent they were rants, I don't see anybody crying in their soup about it.
The Marie Antionnette chat was inexcusable. In fact, it was illegal and actionable. Slander - also a no no.
Think about it like this... if you ran a business and a guy was inside your store talking about how Jesus never existed, how Scandinavias are genetically superior, how Asians smell bad, you'd probably ask him to leave after enough customers complain. On the other hand, the guy who walks up to someone and says, "Hey baby, s*** my d***", repeatedly, using increasingly graphic language.... well, he gets himself the free ride in the police car, spends some time in country for sexual assualt, and learns the hard way just where corn comes from - end of story. A ban is too good for that guy.
The fact that Norse was banned for making editorial comments about race that were just not PC, rather than for using graphic sexual langauge to someone who could as well have been a kid, that's really sad and really diminishes my respect for this site. I think it would be better for all if they toughened up chat policy, and eased away from being thought police on the forums.
gdeangel wrote:Well... I figured I should read some of this crap.
Some of the posts were funny.
The fact that Norse was banned for making editorial comments about race that were just not PC.
gdeangel wrote:On the other hand, the guy who walks up to someone and says, "Hey baby, s*** my d***", repeatedly, using increasingly graphic language.... well, he gets himself the free ride in the police car, spends some time in country for sexual assualt, and learns the hard way just where corn comes from - end of story. A ban is too good for that guy.
gdeangel wrote:The Marie Antionnette chat was inexcusable. In fact, it was illegal and actionable. Slander - also a no no.
If I understood the explanations from the moderator(s) The Marie Antoinette incident was as much a reason as anything, added to the fact that he had been warned repeatedly and continued to thumb his nose at the warnings.gdeangel wrote:Well... I figured I should read some of this crap.
Some of the posts were funny. And to the extent they were rants, I don't see anybody crying in their soup about it.
The Marie Antionnette chat was inexcusable. In fact, it was illegal and actionable. Slander - also a no no.
.....
The fact that Norse was banned for making editorial comments about race that were just not PC, rather than for using graphic sexual langauge to someone who could as well have been a kid, that's really sad and really diminishes my respect for this site. I think it would be better for all if they toughened up chat policy, and eased away from being thought police on the forums.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Actually, I don't know. We agreed to keep me in the dark temporarily so she could get in a game with me and not have me take it easy on her because she's my kid.NeoTony wrote:What's your daughters account name?
Dancing Mustard wrote:I don't know, but I hear she's buff.
Not too bright though; takes after her old man in that respect.
daddy1gringo wrote:Actually, I don't know. We agreed to keep me in the dark temporarily so she could get in a game with me and not have me take it easy on her because she's my kid.NeoTony wrote:What's your daughters account name?
Of course if I knew I would tell you because your posts have shown you to be a person of impeccable character.
daddy1gringo wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:I don't know, but I hear she's buff.
Not too bright though; takes after her old man in that respect.
I have no problem with you saying that. After all you know as much about this subject as you do about most of the things about which you make assertions.
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS