lord voldemort wrote:we undertand mr prime sir hmmm so if G1 is interested....i reckon that would accurately be the top 6 clans on cc then we could do some super dooper clan challenge if we do it obviousy all 6 involved. and we'd need a rep from every clan to work out some details. etc.. saying that, that would be me from untouchables.... ill draft up a pm to send to each clan or we can just talk here i think 5 of the 6 are currently in challenges/about to start so yer this is a month or so down the line, but we should all make this our next challenge
I don't know if I can commit Generation One to something like that at the moment, but if some more details were hammered out we might be able to make it work in some fashion. Just keep me posted.
MarVal wrote:Here are the point ranking of: De Veroveraars der Lage Landen
De Veroveraars der Lage Landen - 25,335 points and 15 members = 1,689 pts per player TOP TEN ELITE = Average 1,863 pts per player
When do we make the update of the points of our clan? Once a week or month? Or is it already posted here?
Grtz MarVal
Hiya marval,
Points update can be made at any time by the Clan Leaders. Its quite hard to get everyone to update their clans points at he same time. I cant imagine points changing drastically in a one month period.
I do know a few clans are holding off posting their points presently due to them being on the verge of capturing a few Majors and letting go of a few cooks. its a cruel businsess isnt it lol
hulmey wrote:I do know a few clans are holding off posting their points presently due to them being on the verge of capturing a few Majors and letting go of a few cooks. its a cruel businsess isnt it lol
miss you too
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Competitive Clans / Usergroups: THOTA rank: 1 (rank based on Hulmey's thread - avg. pts top 10 players) The Spanking Monkeys rank: 2 Legends of War rank: 3 Imperial Dragoons rank: 4 The Untouchables rank: 5 Generation One rank: 6 De Veroveraars der Lage Landen rank: 7 18 and under clan American Dominators Bounty Hunters Bushwhackers Churchill War Cabinet Double Rainbow Society Elmo's War Legion EMPIRE esoog a si !selttikS Feckanity Freemium Forces Gladiators of Sport Grammar and Spelling Nazis Gridiron Gang In Cust we Trust Jesus Freaks Knights of Empire Least I Could do Legion of the Damned Monty Python Fan Club Murder Inc. Mythology Pikachu Pleasant Chaps Region of Risk Fans Rogue State Rose Duelists Sky Force Stachewackers Team Bewbiez The Army of Darkness The Hell-Raising Eyeless Angels of Death The Kings of War The Legionnaires of Chaos The Old-School Forumites The Regulators The Trouts The Truculent Allliance The Warlords of the Wort xiGAMES
The above are the current competitive clans if anyone wants to check their pts.
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
While I like the idea of games involving multiple clans, one issue might be that if there is an overall points board, people may play the game targeting clans ahead of them, instead of to win the game.
bob3603 wrote:While I like the idea of games involving multiple clans, one issue might be that if there is an overall points board, people may play the game targeting clans ahead of them, instead of to win the game.
this is a valid point....though intentionally throwing a game is cheating...and just poor form id like to think that the 6 clans that play this are honorable clans that wouldnt do something like that
bob3603 wrote:While I like the idea of games involving multiple clans, one issue might be that if there is an overall points board, people may play the game targeting clans ahead of them, instead of to win the game.
this is a valid point....though intentionally throwing a game is cheating...and just poor form id like to think that the 6 clans that play this are honorable clans that wouldnt do something like that
Agree, but it might happen subconsciously anyways. An idea that came up in suggestions is fog-of-player games, where people are only known by color until the end of the game. http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=49707 This would resolve any of these issues.
I would suggest that you get 10 points for beating a clan that has offically registred in this thread only and only 1 point for beating a clan that is not on the list pointings on the front page!
hulmey wrote:I would suggest that you get 10 points for beating a clan that has offically registred in this thread only and only 1 point for beating a clan that is not on the list pointings on the front page!
Would this solve the problem?
thats not what we are talking about yer we keep track of clan challenges and such but im proposing a massive clan challenge between 6 clans...if that makes sense
hulmey wrote:I would suggest that you get 10 points for beating a clan that has offically registred in this thread only and only 1 point for beating a clan that is not on the list pointings on the front page!
Would this solve the problem?
thats not what we are talking about yer we keep track of clan challenges and such but im proposing a massive clan challenge between 6 clans...if that makes sense
Hmm, its been done before by yorkiepete!! With the current CC attitude towards clans (wait wait for rivals) I think this is a huge undertaking for anyone who decides to do it!
Plus theres alot more clans out there havent signed up here, we cant leave them out
hulmey wrote:I would suggest that you get 10 points for beating a clan that has offically registred in this thread only and only 1 point for beating a clan that is not on the list pointings on the front page!
Would this solve the problem?
thats not what we are talking about yer we keep track of clan challenges and such but im proposing a massive clan challenge between 6 clans...if that makes sense
Hmm, its been done before by yorkiepete!! With the current CC attitude towards clans (wait wait for rivals) I think this is a huge undertaking for anyone who decides to do it!
Plus theres alot more clans out there havent signed up here, we cant leave them out
its been attempted, but yorkie didnt exactly finish the job. and yeah, i would say definately leave out clans that dont post interest, otherwise its a bunch of bullshit work.
If you've got more than 6 clans, it still works out. Play 8 player games. The problems I see coming up with multiple clans is that some games (6-, 8-player doubles, flat rate/no card singles) won't end. For a long, long time. Escalating solves the stalemate with team games, but then you've got a large majority of points coming from escalating games. The other thing is participation. No doubt everyone wants to play for their clan, but they might rather just win, and so they'd send out one player and one team to play all the games. Do you usually have some kind of depth requirement?
BaldAdonis wrote:If you've got more than 6 clans, it still works out. Play 8 player games. The problems I see coming up with multiple clans is that some games (6-, 8-player doubles, flat rate/no card singles) won't end. For a long, long time. Escalating solves the stalemate with team games, but then you've got a large majority of points coming from escalating games. The other thing is participation. No doubt everyone wants to play for their clan, but they might rather just win, and so they'd send out one player and one team to play all the games. Do you usually have some kind of depth requirement?
yer usually its not a requirement just sort of expected that at least several players play the games. mmmm