Renaming Democrats and Republicans

by **bedub1** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:36 am

I believe more accurate terms we be as follows:

Democrats -> Socialists
Republicans -> Capitalists

What do you guys think?

by **cmckinney** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:40 am

thats pretty much it...

by **MeDeFe** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:57 am

Just number them according to the date when they were founded.

by **InkL0sed** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:59 am

bedub1 wrote:I believe more accurate terms we be as follows:

Democrats -> Socialists
Republicans -> Capitalists

What do you guys think?

I think it should be Commies and Fascists. That would be much more accurate.

by **bedub1** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:45 pm

communists and facists? I don't see how that applies.....

by **InkL0sed** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:53 pm

bedub1 wrote:communists and facists? I don't see how that applies.....

It applies because they're better names... duh :roll:

by **SolidLuigi** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:55 pm

how about:

Democrats = Assholes*
Republicans = Assholes*

Politicians = Assholes*

* = exception for the .01% that aren't

by **GabonX** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:03 pm

InkL0sed wrote:
bedub1 wrote:I believe more accurate terms we be as follows:

Democrats -> Socialists
Republicans -> Capitalists

What do you guys think?

I think it should be Commies and Fascists. That would be much more accurate.

Most of thr countries we call communist were actualy very fascist in nature. The USSR, Red China, and Cuba may all be better examples of the practicing fascist nations than communist ones.

by **Snorri1234** on Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:37 pm

SolidLuigi wrote:how about:

Democrats = Assholes*
Republicans = Assholes*

Politicians = Assholes*

* = exception for the .01% that aren't

Word.

by **bedub1** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:39 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
SolidLuigi wrote:how about:

Democrats = Assholes*
Republicans = Assholes*

Politicians = Assholes*

* = exception for the .01% that aren't

Word.

I must agree with that too. But I was thinking more to have the Name be descriptive of their beliefs and policies, rather their personalities and actions.

by **Snorri1234** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:46 pm

bedub1 wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
SolidLuigi wrote:how about:

Democrats = Assholes*
Republicans = Assholes*

Politicians = Assholes*

* = exception for the .01% that aren't

Word.

I must agree with that too. But I was thinking more to have the Name be descriptive of their beliefs and policies, rather their personalities and actions.

Oh in that case:

Democrats: capitalist
Republicans: more capitalist

by **Snorri1234** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:47 pm

How about

Democrats: Godless heathens
Republicans: Christian wackos

?

by **reminisco** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:59 pm

maybe we should just give the spend thrift Democrats their own place to live, like Taxachussets, while the rest of us god fearing gun lovers continue to wage war on every oil producing nation we can fail at.

by **Nobunaga** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:09 pm

... For the Indiana Caucus, the Democratic Party is assigning "watchmen" to guard against cross-over votes. Too many Republicans were registering as Democrats in attempt to keep Hillary in the race, to keep her and Obama beating the crap out of each other for as long as possible (as opposed to having McCain get beat on).

... The Democratic Party of Indiana will question any voters who seem "suspicious", possibly deny them their vote, and make any who register Democrat for the first time swear an oath to the party to uphold its values, under the threat of possible persecution should "malicious intent" be discovered.

... Now, if that doesn't sound a bit black-boot & brown-shirt, I don't know what does.

...

by **Neoteny** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:12 pm

So, which is more absurd, trying to sabotage the opponents voting process, or trying to prevent the sabotage? Rather, which is more mature, and illustrative of a logical mind?

by **Nobunaga** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:16 pm

Neoteny wrote:So, which is more absurd, trying to sabotage the opponents voting process, or trying to prevent the sabotage? Rather, which is more mature, and illustrative of a logical mind?

... The rules have to be changed, it's not that hard. Republicans cannot vote Democrat in every state.

... What is absurd is people getting upset about the crossovers when crossovers from the Dems gave McCain the nomination and destroyed Romney. The Republican parties of the states did not send out "enforcers" to prevent this.

...

by **reminisco** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:29 pm

Nobunaga wrote:... The rules have to be changed, it's not that hard. Republicans cannot vote Democrat in every state.

... What is absurd is people getting upset about the crossovers when crossovers from the Dems gave McCain the nomination and destroyed Romney. The Republican parties of the states did not send out "enforcers" to prevent this.

...

no offense Nobunaga, but that's the same old fucking bullshit Republican party line. "well, they did it first..."

i'm completely in agreement with Neoteny on this one. Republicans are not always, but way too frequently have failed to emotionally mature beyond 4th fucking grade.

by **browng-08** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:48 pm

reminisco wrote:Republicans are not always, but way too frequently have failed to emotionally mature beyond 4th fucking grade.

This phrase doesn't exactly show signs of emotional/mental development. Tossing out swears like that give you the image of a snub-nosed teen-aged brat. They certainly make it harder for your point to be put across.

Anyways, my nominations:
Democrats -> Moderate Conservatives
Republicans -> Radical Conservatives
Kucinich and Gravel -> Liberals

They're a party in and of themselves.

by **Neoteny** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:53 pm

Respek for Kucinich.

by **browng-08** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:56 pm

Neoteny wrote:Respek for Kucinich.

True dat, yo.

by **reminisco** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:39 pm

browng-08 wrote:
reminisco wrote:Republicans are not always, but way too frequently have failed to emotionally mature beyond 4th fucking grade.
This phrase doesn't exactly show signs of emotional/mental development. Tossing out swears like that give you the image of a snub-nosed teen-aged brat. They certainly make it harder for your point to be put across.

Anyways, my nominations:
Democrats -> Moderate Conservatives
Republicans -> Radical Conservatives
Kucinich and Gravel -> Liberals

They're a party in and of themselves.

jesus christ. if you're not a member of the school board, you should join.

you'd fit in with all the others...

by **The Gunslinger** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:43 pm

Nobunaga wrote:... For the Indiana Caucus, the Democratic Party is assigning "watchmen" to guard against cross-over votes. Too many Republicans were registering as Democrats in attempt to keep Hillary in the race, to keep her and Obama beating the crap out of each other for as long as possible (as opposed to having McCain get beat on).

... The Democratic Party of Indiana will question any voters who seem "suspicious", possibly deny them their vote, and make any who register Democrat for the first time swear an oath to the party to uphold its values, under the threat of possible persecution should "malicious intent" be discovered.

... Now, if that doesn't sound a bit black-boot & brown-shirt, I don't know what does.

...

wow someone doing all that for a CUACUS? some people seriously need to get a life.

by **browng-08** on Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:48 pm

reminisco wrote:
browng-08 wrote:
reminisco wrote:Republicans are not always, but way too frequently have failed to emotionally mature beyond 4th fucking grade.
This phrase doesn't exactly show signs of emotional/mental development. Tossing out swears like that give you the image of a snub-nosed teen-aged brat. They certainly make it harder for your point to be put across.

jesus christ. if you're not a member of the school board, you should join.

you'd fit in with all the others...

Right. I'm sensing a sort of deep-seated conflict with your son/daughters' schoolboard. Maybe something you could take up directly with them? :wink:

(I think I fit in with the head-shrinking crowd too...)

by **reminisco** on Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:58 am

browng-08 wrote:
reminisco wrote:
browng-08 wrote:This phrase doesn't exactly show signs of emotional/mental development. Tossing out swears like that give you the image of a snub-nosed teen-aged brat. They certainly make it harder for your point to be put across.

jesus christ. if you're not a member of the school board, you should join.

you'd fit in with all the others...
Right. I'm sensing a sort of deep-seated conflict with your son/daughters' schoolboard. Maybe something you could take up directly with them?
(I think I fit in with the head-shrinking crowd too...)

no, not all. i just agree with Mark Twain's sentiments about school boards. if you don't know his famous quote, i suggest you look it up.

or else go back to burying your head in the sand and continue using the fallacious argument about profanity discrediting the point. cause, you know, you doing that only reinforces the point i was making... about the whole "they did it first" thing.

but hey, nice try.

by **DaGip** on Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:18 pm

bedub1 wrote:I believe more accurate terms we be as follows:

Democrats -> Socialists
Republicans -> Capitalists

What do you guys think?

Democrats -> Communist Imperialists
Republicans -> Democratic Conservative Communists
Ron Paulican ->True Capitalistic Libertarianism
Independent -> Boob Tube Mindless Followers of Global Dominationistic Propaganda
Green Party -> Why?
The Empire -> Strikes Back
The Rebellion -> Priceless!