Not sure if this is the right place but ...

KoE_Sirius · Post by **KoE_Sirius** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:43 pm

dayalsoap wrote:You guys take this way too seriously.

I'm personally going to attempt to play all of you so I can leave valid negative feedbacks.

Then I'll have all my friends at work do it too.

Great..Thats what we live for

EDIT: Friends at work?...You don't have friends!

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:44 pm

KoE_Sirius wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You guys take this way too seriously.

I'm personally going to attempt to play all of you so I can leave valid negative feedbacks.

Then I'll have all my friends at work do it too.

Great..Thats what we live for

lmao not once we put you on our ignore lists!

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:46 pm

I'll just have the people I work with do it.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:47 pm

dayalsoap wrote:I'll just have the people I work with do it.

you have no life

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:48 pm

You must have as much of a life as I.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:49 pm

dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:50 pm

a nice valid discourse on the value of a negative feedback... ahhh, what a great afternoon at the book store!!! nothing like hanging out, reading some stuff and checking the forums for highly intellectual discussions!!-0

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:52 pm

timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

If you were smart enough to read time, you could see it was <= 1 minute.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:54 pm

dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

If you were smart enough to read time, you could see it was <= 1 minute.

once again the sarcasm goes way over your head

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:55 pm

timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

If you were smart enough to read time, you could see it was <= 1 minute.

once again the sarcasm goes way over your head

No, you just can't tell time, so you're pretending to be sarcastic.
In reality, you just posted a poorly thought out comeback, which nobody believed.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:57 pm

dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

If you were smart enough to read time, you could see it was <= 1 minute.

once again the sarcasm goes way over your head

No, you just can't tell time, so you're pretending to be sarcastic.
In reality, you just posted a poorly thought out comeback, which nobody believed.

you thik im pretending to be sarcastic lmao! And then you say the same flame over again about how i cant tell time. Wow your running out of ideas fast!

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:00 pm

timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:
dayalsoap wrote:You must have as much of a life as I.

wow how long did it take you to think of that one?

If you were smart enough to read time, you could see it was <= 1 minute.

once again the sarcasm goes way over your head

No, you just can't tell time, so you're pretending to be sarcastic.
In reality, you just posted a poorly thought out comeback, which nobody believed.

you thik im pretending to be sarcastic lmao! And then you say the same flame over again about how i cant tell time. Wow your running out of ideas fast!

Do you have 0.00 reading comprehension?

You posted a stupid question, which had an easy answer, that you couldn't answer yourself, because you can't tell time.

To cover up this fact, you claim sarcasm, which is clearly not true. You were dead serious with your "how long did it..." question.

alex_white101 · Post by **alex_white101** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:02 pm

lock'er down.

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:17 pm

i think the point has been proven. his feedbacks aren't valid, and he is a hot head.. sigh.. i eagerly await my invite to a game, so i can get my cool feedback for not talking. and anyone that has played me knows how hard it will be for me to not talk...-0

p.s.-LOCK 'ER DOWN or MOVE IT!!!

Dariune · Post by **Dariune** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:19 pm

AAFitz wrote:I would just like to thank the author of this thread for pointing out a player that many might not consider fun to play and can add to ignore...

Luckilly a Dumb negative feedback says more about the one who left it, than the one who recieved it...

Im just glad i wasnt the only one who thought this was unreasonable

I will ask Monkus to fill out the ticket toomorrow.

As for the offender? he will be my second person to go on my ignore list.

Once again people of CC i apreciate your opinions

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:21 pm

The only thing concluded here was:
1) Using your criterion for feedbacks, the feedbacks given to me were not valid either, so they should be removed
2) It's a matter of opinion, and my criterion differs from the majority.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:24 pm

i agree locker down before i get another warning. We all know who was right here anyway

jimboston · Post by **jimboston** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:27 pm

Technically the negative feedback this gentleman <sarcasm> left is both accurate and valid.

That doesn't make it any less excessive or petty IMHO.

Think about it...
There may be a whole group of CCer's out there who have no one to talk to in real life, and only play games on here so they can get the feelings of having some sort of human contact/conversation. So for those players... this feedback would be very useful. <sarcasm>

Seriously though... it's valid... and can't/shouldn't be removed. It's like free speech... you might not like what Al Franken or Rusch Limbaugh have to say... but that doesn't mean you should be able to make them shut up.

Also... since we've determined already that this gentleman <sarcasm> has no one to talk to in real life... we are essentially making his day by chatting with him in this forum.

Twill · Post by **Twill** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:27 pm

Guys, chill.

There is no need to get upset or angry at anyone.

Dayalsoap, for the record, that should have been neutral feedback, not negative. Your opponent's non-chatter did not negatively effect you, even if it did not add to your playing experience, thus you can't say it deserves negative feedback.

Now, everyone chill, let the thread die a peaceful death and move on

Have a good one
Twill

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:29 pm

is that a twitch in my undies or did twill just come in here and make me feel like a little girl overwhelmed by justin timberlake... wow, twill is so awesome!!!-0

dayalsoap · Post by **dayalsoap** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:33 pm

Twill wrote:Guys, chill.

There is no need to get upset or angry at anyone.

Dayalsoap, for the record, that should have been neutral feedback, not negative. Your opponent's non-chatter did not negatively effect you, even if it did not add to your playing experience, thus you can't say it deserves negative feedback.

Now, everyone chill, let the thread die a peaceful death and move on

Have a good one
Twill

Likewise, none of the negatives I received fit the criterion you've laid out.

Thank you.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:45 pm

dayalsoap wrote:
Likewise, none of the negatives I received fit the criterion you've laid out.

Thank you.

3 of them seem to fit pretty well based on the chat in those games... the last one you got was clearly revenge feedback because it mentions feedback...which would be removed as it stands

the poster will have to edit it to comment on your play and chat style for it to stay... my guess is there will be plenty in the chat to justify it based on what Ive seen here.

You should mention to your friends at work, that if they come in and start leaving revenge feedback for these players, it will be considered an abuse of the feedback system, and they will be removed, and they may even be warned of abusing the system. I would expect a multi check or two also...

You could always just try to get along with people, and enjoy yourself... its kind of what the feedback system was put in place for.

ladookie · Post by **ladookie** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:48 pm

this thread is entertaining. I don't want it to die.

I guess I have no life.

timmytuttut88 · Post by **timmytuttut88** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:49 pm

ladookie wrote:this thread is entertaining. I don't want it to die.

I guess I have no life.

let it die there are more entertaining ones in flame wars

Dariune · Post by **Dariune** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:12 pm

Yeah this was never intended as a flame thread. More so i could guage peoples opinions. Now i know what to do expect a ticket being submited by Mnus shortly.