muy_thaiguy wrote:That's one person's opinion. But if it's on the radio and lots of people are listening to it, it must mean that those bands are doing something right.
If it's on the radio it means they had the right managers and sucked the right cock. People listen to it because it is on the radio, not because it is any good
EDIT: And yes, if you like those bands, then fair enough, but i still think they're shit (which is my opinion)
muy_thaiguy wrote:That's one person's opinion. But if it's on the radio and lots of people are listening to it, it must mean that those bands are doing something right.
If it's on the radio it means they had the right managers and sucked the right cock. People listen to it because it is on the radio, not because it is any good
EDIT: And yes, if you like those bands, then fair enough, but i still think they're shit (which is my opinion)
Because the two are never related.
I think its common knowledge that a vast majority of CD sales and charts are based completly on what people are TOLD to purchase. 'HERES THE HOT NEW BAND - BUY THEIR CD'
Last edited by radiojake on Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
muy_thaiguy wrote:That's one person's opinion. But if it's on the radio and lots of people are listening to it, it must mean that those bands are doing something right.
If it's on the radio it means they had the right managers and sucked the right cock. People listen to it because it is on the radio, not because it is any good
EDIT: And yes, if you like those bands, then fair enough, but i still think they're shit (which is my opinion)
Because the two are never related.
I think its common knowledge that a vast majority of CD sales and charts are based completly on what people are TOLD to purchase. 'HERES THE HOT NEW BAND - BUY THEY'RE CD'
I was speaking in extremes, though (b/c you were). I might agree with you here... meh.
i cant beleive jet and muse got on here...jet is yuck they played at afl grand final year just gone and they were shit
muse are meh..prolly the best 3 peice band going around right now..but i hate 3 peice bands...
i cant beleive rage hasnt got a mention at all..
I'm surprised U2 hasn't made it closer to the top of most lists. Just because Bono dresses like a douche doesn't mean he's not a vocalist second only to Robert Plant himself...
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
Stymie wrote:This is coming from someone who thinks the Beatles are the best band. Whatever floats your boat... All I got to say about the Beatles is boring, boring.....
Have you ever really listened to the Beatles, beyond the 5 songs that are on every movie soundtrack? What's the least boring of their albums, in your opinion? The most boring?
In my opinion, "Rubber Soul."
Beatles have 4 albums in the Rolling Stones Magazine top 10.
No one has ever had as much impact on music as them. Sure their music isn't much compared to today's standard but you must compare everything relative to their own time. They didn't have the technology we have now.
You're trying to compare The Ford Model T, the first mass produce car with a Porsche 911. Of course the Porsche can beat the Model T in all aspects, but the Model T had a much greater impact on society than the Porsche did when it came out.
See what I'm getting at?
Almost every existing band has been influenced in one way or another by the Beatles.
not nessarly, or at least comparing in time. While there aren't as many 60's bands I would of liked, there are still some I think are better then the Beatles. I don't personally like them that much and do seem a bit popish. A better 60's band (late 60's) would be Frank Zappa. Also I believe Pink Floyd started around late 60's too.
Vote: Mandy Eddie35: hi everyone Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
OnlyAmbrose wrote:I'm surprised U2 hasn't made it closer to the top of most lists. Just because Bono dresses like a douche doesn't mean he's not a vocalist second only to Robert Plant himself...
I put U2, and not because of Bono's voice. More like the Edge's guitar's voice.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:you forgot megadeth and metallica
Metallica is pretty good, megadeth is less so. They just copy metallica.
More like the other way around, since Dave Mustaine wrote most of their early albums 'till they booted him. Besides, the only good member of metallica is Lars Ulrich, the rest are pansies.
1: Pink Floyd
2: Led Zeppelin
3: AC/DC
4: Nirvana
5: Rolling Stones
6: The Who
7: Black Sabboth
8: Guns 'N Roses
9: Jimi Hendrix
10: Megadeth
11: Queen
(I had to go to eleven, because ten isn't loud enough )
And in no order of greatness, how can one judge if it all is good. There should be more, but I don't feel like listing my entire CD collection.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark
"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
Stymie wrote:This is coming from someone who thinks the Beatles are the best band. Whatever floats your boat... All I got to say about the Beatles is boring, boring.....
Have you ever really listened to the Beatles, beyond the 5 songs that are on every movie soundtrack? What's the least boring of their albums, in your opinion? The most boring?
In my opinion, "Rubber Soul."
Beatles have 4 albums in the Rolling Stones Magazine top 10.
No one has ever had as much impact on music as them. Sure their music isn't much compared to today's standard but you must compare everything relative to their own time. They didn't have the technology we have now.
You're trying to compare The Ford Model T, the first mass produce car with a Porsche 911. Of course the Porsche can beat the Model T in all aspects, but the Model T had a much greater impact on society than the Porsche did when it came out.
See what I'm getting at?
Almost every existing band has been influenced in one way or another by the Beatles.
not nessarly, or at least comparing in time. While there aren't as many 60's bands I would of liked, there are still some I think are better then the Beatles. I don't personally like them that much and do seem a bit popish. A better 60's band (late 60's) would be Frank Zappa. Also I believe Pink Floyd started around late 60's too.
Agreed, i would rather listen to Pink Floyd or U2 anyitme over the Beatles, but my list isn't based on my personal tastes but rather an objective view on how influencial the bands were. I don't really like the Ramones, yet they are 4th on my list.
Bob Seger and the Silver Bullet Band
ZZ Top
The Rolling Stones
The Who
Lynard Skynard
Colin James Band
The Beatles
James Taylor and the Flying Machine
The BB King Band
Robert Johnson Band (had to be mentioned.....every band who has ever recorded any blues owes a debt to Robert Johnson)
Gatekeeper, and Proud Member of XI Games Newt Hunter
InkL0sed wrote:Second tier: Architecture In Helsinki (little known and hard to get used to, but great) Depeche Mode (if you write them off as emo you're just biased) Metallica Nine Inch Nails The Pixies The Police Queen Red Hot Chili Peppers Smashing Pumpkins (only those few good albums in the 90s though) The Smiths
Architecture in Helsinki?!? You are seriously reaching. Their last album was a turd.
And who would ever call Depeche Mode emo? You are showing your age here.
Roses are red
Shit is brown
Nothing but assholes
Live in this town
All I got to say about the Beatles is boring, boring.....
)
