Moderator: Community Team
AAFitz wrote:KoE_Sirius wrote:If you guys only want to talk about my games..My email is doggy_sirius@msn.com.
This thread is designed for everyone.I don't think I have singled out anyone person in any of my threads.I haven't even singled out a clan or groups of people.
I'm sure you'll correct me if I am mistaken.
Geeez you guys are so defensive.
KoE_Sirius wrote:I just wish the snobbery would stop in this community. I have never refused to play anyone because of rank.If I did then I would properly still have a crown.The crown would be worthless though.
If you can't play all of conquerclub,then it tends to limit our horizons.
AAFitz wrote:You mention your games in your second line of your other thread which you refer to in this one, and then go on to call others snobs, and imply the games you play are better. Certainly pointing out your games is relevant.
I dont blame you for wanting to be able to just criticize other players because of their game choice... which clearly you are by calling them snobs, and saying you are better because of the games you play. But you really cant expect no one to show that the games you play, could be viewed as worse than those of the ones you are calling snobs.
And saying youre not targeting other players is another nice try. Clearly you are complaining about players that play private games, and not open ones, and calling them snobs.
Some people will be fooled at your subtle attempts here, but hopefully not all. You're doing a very good job of it to be honest, but its still transparent.
Risktaker17 wrote:I join 1v1's with new recruits whenever I see one open, I've made like 5 points off of them yay!
AAFitz wrote:This poll of course is so limited, as to be worth less. Either a player is joining a game as an excuse, or to skim??
Its too bad know one joins because they just want to play the game and have some fun...
Genghis Khan CA wrote:l in a game which barely resembles the original rules of risk may be fun in your opinion.
Frop wrote:Snorri1234, it's quite hilarious you think we're skimming your points in a public sequential triples game we started as team 1.
We all had a first time we played this map and you could start out by reading the legend (it actually tells you the objective of the map, if any, and which regions of the map give you a bonus).
Apart from that you have 24 hours for each turn to think out your strategy and to anticipate your opponent's next move(s). How is that even remotely comparable to playing 1v1 freestyle speed games on that map? Not to mention that for instance comic boy's triple team could've just as easily joined that game...
and 1 player makes the moves for the entire team. its almost impossible to lose.prisonbreak wrote:I looked at all of SkyT's games and none of their opponents is over a corporol
same herewacicha wrote:I make 50 games at a time, yes the lower ranks join. But a lot of great players join. An I lose points to both.
I do not think anyone would Say I creat games to skim.
bingodezzy26 wrote:lets be totally honest high ranked players are in a no win situation.
you are damned if you only play high ranked players because your "protecting" your points.
you are damned if you play low ranked players because then your "skimming" your points
boy am i glad i suck at this game.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:bingodezzy26 wrote:lets be totally honest high ranked players are in a no win situation.
you are damned if you only play high ranked players because your "protecting" your points.
you are damned if you play low ranked players because then your "skimming" your points
boy am i glad i suck at this game.
if you look through my active games, about 150 right now, you will see games where I am playing every rank possible and all different styles/modes. Yet If I play a low rank I am abusing the system by getting easy points. If I play high ranks than im a snob for not playing low ranks. the only thing consistant is, we complain for the sake of complaining.
Frop wrote:I understand it's one of the more exotic maps, but for triples it isn't that bad actually. A simple strategy on any (unknown) map would be to go for the smallest bonus, because it's usually the easiest to defend (least bordering territories). Apart from that you definitely don't want your opponent to have a bonus, so if you can't figure out anything else just stack to break a bonus.
Secondly, having deadbeats on your team is always annoying. One of the additional benefits of more experienced players is that they are less likely to miss turns (or they have a babysitter).![]()
You're prolly right that you have a smaller chance of winning if you're playing unorganized, selflessly or missing your turns altogether. Apart from that I think sequential no cards team games provide the most equal chances for everybody, not counting the usual 'luck' factors (dice/drop/starting turn).
Yup. I wanna try every map at least once, but classic (and 2.1) are the ones I like most.(Classic is obviously still my favourite though).
KoE_Sirius wrote:CAN A MOD LOCK THIS THREAD PLEASE.ITS NOT MEANT TO BE NEGATIVE AT ALL.
IT WAS ONLY POSTED AS A BIT OF LIGHT HEARTED HUMOUR.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users