DiM wrote:rebelman wrote:DiM wrote:but i'm thinking something else
what about??
2500+
2000-2499
1500-1999
1000-1499
sounds good but make the last category 0 - 1499
actually 1-1499 because 0 is impossible.
no, not techincally, unless lack has coded a lower limmit, and if so i haven't heard of it. a score of zero could be achieved if a 20-point player beat another 20-point player. Then, the looser would loose 20 points and be at zero. technically, even a negative score is possible. say a guy with one point plays another guy with one point. Then the winner gets 20 points because points added = 20 times the loosers score divided by the winners score. And the looser looses 20 points and goes to -19. (unless lack has coded a lower limit to the scoring system that I'm unaware of) Once at a negative score, assuming it's possible, then this person would actually LOOSE points when they win and GAIN points when the loose because, when the win, with the current formula, they will gain a NEGATIVE amount of points... is there something wrong with my math here?