Page 1 of 1

L4z & Enjuto [Cleared]

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:41 am
by Risque99
These two are definately working together secretly or a multi.


Accused:

L4z
Enjuto


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis OR
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Comments: game 5020535

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:45 pm
by apb23
Hate to break it to ya bud...but one is from finland and the other is from spain. And I am pretty sure that they have only played one game together. Should be cleared quick.

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:58 pm
by Risque99
Both joined same day though....17.43 and 18.26 on 4 June. Neither appear to be novices though. I suppose they could have just spontaneously just decided to work together but the game play was suspicious.

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:30 pm
by apb23
You may be right...but they are noobs and they could be clueless, which is what I believe.

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:58 pm
by a.sub
formatting

Risque99 wrote:These two are definately working together secretly or a multi.


Accused:
[player]L4z[/player]
[player]Enjuto[/player]


The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis OR
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Comments:
Game 5020535

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:01 am
by king sam
I concur I would count this one as the dice/cards may have given the perception of them being in cahoots but there is not enough to support it.

A. its a freestyle match where there gameplay intertwines enough to make me believe there not multis.
B. 1st game played between the 2, need more of a trend to determine a Secret Diplomacy

Regards,
King Sam

Re: L4z & Enjuto

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:17 pm
by lancehoch
apb23 wrote:Hate to break it to ya bud...but one is from finland and the other is from spain. And I am pretty sure that they have only played one game together. Should be cleared quick.

[player]L4z[/player] and [player]Enjuto[/player] are Cleared of being multis. If there is more suspicious activity in multiple games, then post in this thread (or if it is locked make a new thread) and the secret alliance accusation will be looked at again.