Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by pimpdave »

Okay, get out your ripped jeans and flannels. Hit up a thrift store if you are lacking such clothes.

Grow out your hair and stop washing it for 6 days. Then dye it pink, or green.

Now you are sufficiently grunge enough to answer the following question:

Nirvana or Pearl Jam?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by pimpdave »

It might be cheating to tell you this, but the correct answer is Nirvana.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by InkL0sed »

I never understood what it was about Nirvana, I'm not crazy about them.

Pearl Jam, on the other hand, is awesome.

I guess I'm going with the wrong answer.
User avatar
Iz Man
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Western Mass
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by Iz Man »

Pearl Jam for me.
Albeit I've seen them live (3rd row center.... BOOYAH) and not Nirvana.
While I like Nirvana's first 2 albums, the Kurt Cobain craze (comparing him to rock greats Hendrix, Morrison & Joplin) after his offing himself dropped them (him) down my list of good bands throughout the decades.
Image
"Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the world."
-Kaiser Wilhelm II
Image
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by Juan_Bottom »

LOCK THIS F*CKING THREAD!
PIMPDAVE SHOULD BE FLOGGED.
User avatar
Serbia
Posts: 12280
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by Serbia »

Nirvana is good, Pearl Jam is great. Pearl Jam musically is just far superior to Nirvana, and is (in my opinion) a bit underrated as one of the best bands ever. McCready is an awesome soloist, and Ament is a great bassist.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
nagerous
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am
Gender: Male

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by nagerous »

Gotta be Nirvana...

Pearl Jam are awesome but they are not as great as Nirvana or The Smashing Pumpkins for that matter.
Image
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by hecter »

Nirvana.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Vace Cooper
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: MN

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by Vace Cooper »

Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam? WHAT THE f*ck! I HATE PEARL JAM!
Image
owen is a sexy mother f***er
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by owenshooter »

soundgarden. period. lock 'er down...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by InkL0sed »

No way, Alice in Chains pwns Soundgarden
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by pimpdave »

But none of those other bands would have broken out onto the national, nay, international scene without Nirvana.

So, despite the fact that mechanically speaking, yes, Alice in Chains is a huge winner over all of those other Seattle grunge bands, Nirvana must remain reigning supreme.

Also, Dave Grohl is a sick drummer.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
lgoasklucyl
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Somewhere in the 20th century.

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by lgoasklucyl »

InkL0sed wrote:I never understood what it was about Nirvana, I'm not crazy about them.

Pearl Jam, on the other hand, is awesome.

I guess I'm going with the wrong answer.



^ That.
Image
User avatar
SEAsportsfan
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:27 pm

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by SEAsportsfan »

pimpdave wrote:Also, Dave Grohl is a sick musician.


Fixed. ;)

I'm going with Nirvana, because I like more of their songs, but I must admit that Pearl Jam has a much better lead man in Eddie Vedder.
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by strike wolf »

I actually like pearl jam better than Nirvana.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by strike wolf »

Iz Man wrote:Pearl Jam for me.
Albeit I've seen them live (3rd row center.... BOOYAH) and not Nirvana.
While I like Nirvana's first 2 albums, the Kurt Cobain craze (comparing him to rock greats Hendrix, Morrison & Joplin) after his offing himself dropped them (him) down my list of good bands throughout the decades.


Yes, I would never compare them to the greats and I think they would have faded eventually anyways if he hadn't died.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
User avatar
Phil1580
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:00 am
Gender: Male
Location: New Englander in the land of Dixie.

Re: Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam

Post by Phil1580 »

Absolutely, positively, no doubt, not even close. Fucking PEARL JAM for the win.

Seen them live in concert 19 times. :) Now I do like Nirvana, but if you like your rock dumbed down punk-style with no more than 4 chords, little to no lead guitar solos, and a far-inferior singer, by all means select the band that hasn't existed in 14 years over the only Seattle "grunge" era band still kicking ass going on 20 years.

Ok, stepping off my PJ soapbox....
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”