PLAYER57832 wrote:I support laws that say adults, not kids, own guns and laws that keep people with certain criminal convictions or mental conditions away from guns.
Already law. and I agree.
I support waiting periods, especially on certain types of guns because they DO reduce (not eliminate) unthinking crimes of passion (particularly in domestic violance situations) without seriously hurting law-abiding citizen's rights to carry.
I am really mixed on this. According to the FBI (Source:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/fuo.txt). 80% of guns used in any sort of crime, are either purchased illegaly on the street, or are obtained by a family member or friend. Only 8% are even purchased at any sort of retail location. Less than 1% are bought at gun shows. I would much rather see our time spent on curbing the illegal/stolen gun trade, then going after the very small number of guns that are purchased through normal chanels. I don't know how much truth there is to the idea that having a waiting period of X number of days is really going to reduce crime at all. I am not able to find really good stats on crimes commited on same day gun purchases, so I can't speak to that.
I support some limits on automatic weapons.
Already law. I for the most part agree, although I really doubt that ciminals are going to spend the type of money needed for fully automatic guns. I will say, those two guys in LA did show us the scary side of what can happen when ciminals do get ahold of them.
I support laws that say you need a permit to have a concealed weapon and, in some cases (cities, particularly) I support limits on hand guns ... particularly certain hand guns that are used almost exclusively in crimes. AND, I think we are intelligent enough as a society to distinguish these uses from hunting, personal defense, etc.
You already need a permit for concealed carry in basicly all states were it is legal. I am a little concerned with limiting hand guns in cities, as we saw in the Hellar case, a handgun is probably the most common home defense weapon. What factor are you using to make a distinction between a handgun that is used "exclusively" in crimes? If you look through the DOJ report in my link above, the types of firearms that ciminals are using, are the dirt cheap, illegaly traded stuff. Most of these are revolvers, or low capacity semi-auto handguns.
That is the beauty of being human. We can make choices and distinctions. The beauty of our country is that we celebrate those differances, for good and ill. It is when we lose site of that ability to distinguish situations that problems occur.
I very much agree. I just hope that the new administration takes the time to look at the statistics available. If they pass any sort of firearms related legislation, I hope that it targets ciminals, and their access to weapons. I fear though, that instead we will get further restrictions and further loss of rights, in the name of keeping the honest, honest.
--John
(since I can't argue with you in the FT, I'll have to do it here.

)