Animal Rights

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
laci_mae
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:08 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Arkansas

Animal Rights

Post by laci_mae »

I recently remembered that when dog fighting became a huge issue (thanks Mike Vick!) several reporters compared it to hunting. Animal rights issues in general interest me, so I was wondering what you think.

So as not to taint the thread, I'll chime in later with my own thoughts.

Best,
L
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Dancing Mustard »

Heh heh, very funny.

Obviously there's no such thing... everybody knows that.


That said, I think you should have saved this clever hoax thread until April 1st.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Iliad »

Dancing Mustard wrote:Heh heh, very funny.

Obviously there's no such thing... everybody knows that.


That said, I think you should have saved this clever hoax thread until April 1st.

Nah we bring out the Woman Rights then
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Dancing Mustard »

Which dictionary of Unfeasible Urban Myths are you people using? I need to buy a copy.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Animal Rights

Post by MeDeFe »

But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Animal Rights

Post by jonesthecurl »

I think we should arm all the deer and foxes. Nobody would mess with them then.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Dancing Mustard »

I thought it was the bears we were supposed to be arming?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Frigidus »

Dancing Mustard wrote:I thought it was the bears we were supposed to be arming?


I thought we were bearing right arms...
khazalid
Posts: 3413
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:39 am
Location: scotland

Re: Animal Rights

Post by khazalid »

if youre vege and you know it clap your hands

*clap clap*
had i been wise, i would have seen that her simplicity cost her a fortune
User avatar
Bertros Bertros
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:30 am
Location: Riding the wave of mediocrity

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Bertros Bertros »

MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?


The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.

If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.

=D> =D>
khazalid
Posts: 3413
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:39 am
Location: scotland

Re: Animal Rights

Post by khazalid »

Bertros Bertros wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?


The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.

If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.

=D> =D>



http://www.stpt.usf.edu/hhl/papers/species.htm

spot the logical fallacies
had i been wise, i would have seen that her simplicity cost her a fortune
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Animal Rights

Post by jonesthecurl »

khazalid wrote:if youre vege and you know it clap your hands

*clap clap*


[calls]
Come on, curlette. Clap.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Animal Rights

Post by jonesthecurl »

Bertros Bertros wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?


The difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer is one is a human and the other is a deer. Thats a great enough distinction that all others seem fairly insignificant. There is a difference between concerned about animal rights in respect of welfare and being vege/vegan or queueing up to chain yourself to the gates of your local medical research centre.

If you're a compassionate omnivore who enjoys a bit of steak that died happy clap your hands.

=D> =D>

=D> =D> =D>
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Animal Rights

Post by jay_a2j »

MeDeFe wrote:But seriously, is there any good reason for denying animals the basic rights we afford other humans, like the right to life and individual liberty? Or is the only difference between shooting a human and shooting a deer that one is illegal "because the law says so"?



Let us get "human rights" taken care of before we concentrate on animals. It is my opinion that human life is just a tad more valuable than animal life.


(btw some people eat those deer they shoot)
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Dancing Mustard »

jay_a2j wrote:Yeah man! Animal rights and power and shit!! Deer deserve tinfoil too!!!1

Sure they do Jay...
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
apey
Posts: 3957
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:38 pm
Gender: Female
Location: mageplunkas guest house

Re: Animal Rights

Post by apey »

I like animals
on my plate next to the mashed potatoes
04:42:40 ‹apey› uhoh
04:42:40 ‹ronc8649› uhoh
iAmCaffeine: 4/28/2016. I love how the PL players are getting wet on your wall
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Juan_Bottom »

I think animal rights stop after cruelty to animals. Define that, and problem sovled. I don't want to evict a gopher from my yard only to find that he's been living there for three weeks so I was supposed to file some paperwork.
Also, the droz test is cruelty to animals.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Animal Rights

Post by MeDeFe »

So far there are no arguments from the side that would deny animals their rights, it all boils down to "because I say so", at least jay was honest enough to openly state that it was his opinion that the life of a human is more valuable than the life of an animal.

But why is that? What're your reasons for thinking like that, jay and others?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: Animal Rights

Post by strike wolf »

It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Animal Rights

Post by MeDeFe »

strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.

Natural does not equal moral.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: Animal Rights

Post by strike wolf »

MeDeFe wrote:
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.

Natural does not equal moral.


Maybe not but it's good enough for me.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4617
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Animal Rights

Post by jonesthecurl »

MeDeFe wrote:
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.

Natural does not equal moral.


Nor does unnatural.

Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.

Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Animal Rights

Post by Neoteny »

jonesthecurl wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.

Natural does not equal moral.


Nor does unnatural.

Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.

Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.


As an avid meat eater I agree.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Animal Rights

Post by MeDeFe »

jonesthecurl wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
strike wolf wrote:It's natural to kill animals for their meat. Every predator on the planet does it. Are we supposed to go up to lions and tell them they can't kill other animals anymore because they have rights too? Now this is not to say I support hunting just for sport. Quite the opposite. If you are hunting, you should be taking more than just a head to put above your fireplace.

Natural does not equal moral.

Nor does unnatural.

Either God designed me to be able to be carnivorous, or my ancestors evolved that way for good reason. Either way it's good enough for me.

Cruelty is another matter, and as a species we treat our food-providing animals (both those we eat and those we milk or take eggs from) very badly in most cases. But this is a different question.

Have you taken a good look at your teeth? Not much carnivorous to speak of there.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: Animal Rights

Post by strike wolf »

Have you taken a look at what tastes good to us. Not much herbivorous there.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”