Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
yodermk
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:22 am
Gender: Male
Location: San Antonio, TX

Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Post by yodermk »

This is based on the gameplay of TEG, an Argentinian clone of Risk. An open source version is available at http://teg.sf.net (it's a Linux program, not sure if there's a Windows version or not)

Concise description:
  • After a successful attack, the conquering player can advance AT MOST three armies to the conquered territory!
  • At the end of the turn, any given army can move exactly one adjacent territory

Specifics:
  • Regular Risk makes you advance at least three armies given a successful attack (assuming you rolled 3 red dice). CC doesn't have that restriction of course. But this lets you advance at most three.
  • Now, it is impossible to take a hoard of armies and sweep the board with them.
  • At fortification, you have an unlimited number of fortification moves, but any given army can only move to an adjacent territory. Say you have 5 armies and Afghanistan and 5 in China, and you want to move them all to Siam. You can move the 4 free armies in Afghanistan to China, now having 9 in China. How many can now be sent to Siam? Only 4, because there were 4 free armies in China at the beginning of the fortification.
  • I don't know if these need to be tied together or not. TEG uses both of these changes. But it would be possible to use one without the other.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Just another interesting option
User avatar
Jell-O
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Post by Jell-O »

I like it. Bump.
User avatar
max is gr8
Posts: 3720
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:44 am
Location: In a big ball of light sent from the future

Re: Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Post by max is gr8 »

All already been suggested search prior to posting in the future
‹max is gr8› so you're a tee-total healthy-eating sex-addict?
‹New_rules› Everyone has some bad habits
(4th Jan 2010)
User avatar
Jell-O
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Post by Jell-O »

max is gr8 wrote:All already been suggested search prior to posting in the future


...unless you have a life.

like anyone is going to spend 30 minutes searching for a post that may or may not exist somewhere in the archives
User avatar
Kemmler
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: GOODBYE CC
Contact:

Re: Different advancement and fortification rules (TEG)

Post by Kemmler »

true. sounds like an interesting variant but will prob not be implemented.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”