RATINGS

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
User avatar
General Mayhem
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:29 am
Location: Leeds, England, UK

RATINGS

Post by General Mayhem »

Just tried to leave one.
Hasnt showed up for them. But it saves it when i view to change the rating?

Does it work or does it need more than 1 rating
"There is a forgotten, nay almost forbidden word, which means more to me than any other. That word is ENGLAND."
User avatar
happy2seeyou
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Female
Location: A state that is in the shape of a mitten!
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by happy2seeyou »

we cannot see the ratings until the game is archived.... so every few days your ratings will change instead of every finished game.
User avatar
jiminski
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Gender: Female
Location: London

Re: RATINGS

Post by jiminski »

happy2seeyou wrote:we cannot see the ratings until the game is archived.... so every few days your ratings will change instead of every finished game.


how do you know that, little miss swanky-pants!? ^^
Image
User avatar
happy2seeyou
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Female
Location: A state that is in the shape of a mitten!
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by happy2seeyou »

jiminski wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:we cannot see the ratings until the game is archived.... so every few days your ratings will change instead of every finished game.


how do you know that little miss swanky-pants!? ^^


Because I'm a freaking genius.
User avatar
what,me worry?
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:40 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bay area, California

Re: RATINGS

Post by what,me worry? »

jiminski wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:we cannot see the ratings until the game is archived.... so every few days your ratings will change instead of every finished game.


how do you know that little miss swanky-pants!? ^^


it says it in the section entitled "ratings" might be a good read if you have questions on ratings..........lol :roll:

Any way, I thought i heard lack saying something about being able to go back into archived games leaving ratings for those who youve played with in the past for something like 3 days or something?

Anyone hear what happened or even hear about this at all or am just drinking too much :?:
User avatar
jiminski
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Gender: Female
Location: London

Re: RATINGS

Post by jiminski »

what,me worry? wrote:
Any way, I thought i heard lack saying something about being able to go back into archived games leaving ratings for those who youve played with in the past for something like 3 days or something?

Anyone hear what happened ....


yes i did.
Image
User avatar
what,me worry?
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:40 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bay area, California

Re: RATINGS

Post by what,me worry? »

jiminski wrote:
what,me worry? wrote:
Any way, I thought i heard lack saying something about being able to go back into archived games leaving ratings for those who youve played with in the past for something like 3 days or something?

Anyone hear what happened ....


yes i did.


keep going. cant leave me hanging......... did u hear what happened to that?
User avatar
SlayerQC
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:28 pm
Gender: Male

Re: RATINGS

Post by SlayerQC »

And I thought we were going to keep the comments left for us before and have the option to delete them.
Where are they?
So far im not liking that new system, its just like ebay but it misses the best part: the comments.
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: RATINGS

Post by hulmey »

basically CC doesnt want to spend the time moderating them!! its a case of to many players whinnig about what feedback they have been given. then that fucks it up for the rest of us....grrr
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
jako
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:50 am
Gender: Male
Location: A lost soul with no-one to stalk.

Re: RATINGS

Post by jako »

well, rating system does lack the comments that justifies the ratings that are given. the wall is just too unreliable as it is self-moderated so anything bad can be removed which means we never really know if a rating is accurate or not.
Image

Time to retire this much loved sig of mine with a new clan.
User avatar
Fruitcake
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:38 am

Re: RATINGS

Post by Fruitcake »

I keep getting different amounts of ratings that I can leave.

One moment it says ' You can leave ratings for 65 members! '
The next it says ' You can leave ratings for 103 members! '

?
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
*manimal
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:19 pm

Re: RATINGS

Post by *manimal »

Fruitcake wrote:I keep getting different amounts of ratings that I can leave.

One moment it says ' You can leave ratings for 65 members! '
The next it says ' You can leave ratings for 103 members! '

?


Same
You can leave ratings for 730 members!
You can leave ratings for 403 members!
User avatar
cicero
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC

Re: RATINGS

Post by cicero »

Where does it say this ?
("You can leave ratings for X members!")

At the moment I can only find a way in to leave ratings via the "recently finished" tab.
I'd like to leave ratings for all those I have previously left feedback for which, as others have noted, is mentioned in the General Discussion thread that preceded this update ... Not sure if it's actually mentioned in the update announcement ...
FREE M-E-Mbership and simple rules. Conquer Club - it's not complicated.

random me statistic @ 13 December 2008 - 1336 posts : 232nd most public posts (not counting Tower of Babble) of all time.
User avatar
happy2seeyou
Posts: 4021
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:59 pm
Gender: Female
Location: A state that is in the shape of a mitten!
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by happy2seeyou »

I think it depends on how many games are in your "Recently Finished" and "Eliminated". Once they are archived then you cannot leave ratings for them. maybe some of your games were archived recently.
User avatar
Battle-Rage
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:43 am
Location: Cairns Australia

Re: RATINGS

Post by Battle-Rage »

This new system blows.

I just broke 300 positives with no negatives for nothing.
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by lord voldemort »

Battle-Rage wrote:This new system blows.

I just broke 300 positives with no negatives for nothing.

u can still view them...go to your profile under the view ratings is a view feedback. that will stay there frozen for several months...then the mods are looking at transferring it over
Image
User avatar
laci_mae
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:08 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Arkansas

Re: RATINGS

Post by laci_mae »

SlayerQC wrote:And I thought we were going to keep the comments left for us before and have the option to delete them.
Where are they?
So far im not liking that new system, its just like ebay but it misses the best part: the comments.


You can still see all feedback if you go to a users profile and select that option. The ratings will seem better once the system cycles, and everyone has numbers instead of n/a.

LMR
User avatar
Battle-Rage
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:43 am
Location: Cairns Australia

Re: RATINGS

Post by Battle-Rage »

lord voldemort wrote:
Battle-Rage wrote:This new system blows.

I just broke 300 positives with no negatives for nothing.

u can still view them...go to your profile under the view ratings is a view feedback. that will stay there frozen for several months...then the mods are looking at transferring it over


Yeah, but the whole concept is stupid, where over two years of past efforts is thrown into the bin for this new crappy one.

If the old system was intergrated into the new one, then it may mean something. But it doesn't.

The only advantage is to new players and bad players.
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by lord voldemort »

the old feedbacks will be integrated once the new system is in effect and all the kinks worked out
Image
Hrvat
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:41 pm

Re: RATINGS

Post by Hrvat »

lord voldemort wrote:the old feedbacks will be integrated once the new system is in effect and all the kinks worked out


"integrated" ??

I was under the impression that old feedbacks are obsolete... :
Copy paste : "We'll figure out how to drop feedback for good at a later date, in consultation with the community."
No more feedback.

Anyway, I have a strange feeling that our wonderful new star system will average out between 3.5 and 4.5 stars for majority of players. If that happens..., how is that going to help replace Old Feedback?
I'll never pay for another Premium on ConquerClub.
User avatar
lexie3000
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:42 pm
Gender: Male

Re: RATINGS

Post by lexie3000 »

might be a bit early to tell but it doesn't seem like an improvement for me. I never got a neg comment but it wouldn't have bothered me if they'd all been negative. what i liked about the system was the insight it gave me to other players. it was also a source of entertainment - especially the really bitchy stuff. brinkmanship, sledging, goading - hey that's cricket. why not risk as well?
User avatar
douglasefresh
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:45 am

Re: RATINGS

Post by douglasefresh »

Dear CC,

I was a big fan of the previous comments system - it enabled players to be quite creative and humourous if they wished and to make comments that were meaningful for the recipient, players who were considering joining a game with the recipient and of course for the player leaving the comment to refer to if playing the same player again. It was also full of rants, insults and nonsense - most of which was either simple to ignore if easily offended and often entertaining for those of us who aren't.

While I respect all at CC for the hard work they put in making this site a lot of fun (hells teeth! - I like it enough to pay for it) and completely understand why you would not want to have to moderate the comments system ( I certainly wouldn't envy the task); the new 'star' system is dull and meaningless and I shall only be using it to guess how well each player flips burgers.

I would suggest a return to the comments system in a form which wouldn't require moderation.

Verdict: 1/5 stars
jaseleo
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sunderland
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by jaseleo »

The new system is going to be a lot worse, when you come across a player in a game who plays badly he will go straight to foe list, you have no way of checking why you put him there and this is going to cause private messages getting sent all over asking to be took off. I understand the amount of work involved in feedback moderation but thats what we pay for, why should the customer suffer because the shop cant keep up with demand!!
“Kill a man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror. Kill everyone, and you are a god.”
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: RATINGS

Post by lord voldemort »

jaseleo wrote:The new system is going to be a lot worse, when you come across a player in a game who plays badly he will go straight to foe list, you have no way of checking why you put him there and this is going to cause private messages getting sent all over asking to be took off. I understand the amount of work involved in feedback moderation but thats what we pay for, why should the customer suffer because the shop cant keep up with demand!!

u should check forums first....a system is happening that allows notes for the foe list....and hte mods are volunteers :roll: we pay for lack to do coke off of strippers, among other things
Image
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: RATINGS

Post by hulmey »

lord voldemort wrote:
jaseleo wrote:The new system is going to be a lot worse, when you come across a player in a game who plays badly he will go straight to foe list, you have no way of checking why you put him there and this is going to cause private messages getting sent all over asking to be took off. I understand the amount of work involved in feedback moderation but thats what we pay for, why should the customer suffer because the shop cant keep up with demand!!

u should check forums first....a system is happening that allows notes for the foe list....and hte mods are volunteers :roll: we pay for lack to do coke off of strippers, among other things


CC implemented the feedback system to try and make it fair for everyone and so they dont have to moderate players (which takes up to much time). I earn $25 in an hour so really your paying peanuts. i do prefer the old sytem but it just wasnt pracitcal!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”