Sorry Grandma, No More Tongue

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
dustn64
Posts: 4683
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The Birthplace of Basketball

Sorry Grandma, No More Tongue

Post by dustn64 »

reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

that's a cool piece of news. see, that's a proactive change in a state's laws to actually make a positive difference in the lives of it's citizenry.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
mr. incrediball
Posts: 3423
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:07 pm
Location: Right here.

Post by mr. incrediball »

MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

dustin wrote:sorry grandma, no more tongue


indeed. a loss for the whole world :cry:
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

mr. incrediball wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

True, but even if you're 17 years and 11 months old you're still a minor.
Last edited by MeDeFe on Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Post by muy_thaiguy »

MeDeFe wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

True, but even if you're 17 ears and 11 months old you're still a minor.
Also a mutant.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

muy_thaiguy wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

True, but even if you're 17 ears and 11 months old you're still a minor.
Also a mutant.


And at that point being a sex offender is the least of your concerns.
Image
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

The typo has been corrected, now, if you would care to respond to my actual point I would be very much obliged.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Minister Masket
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: On The Brink

Post by Minister Masket »

unriggable wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

True, but even if you're 17 ears and 11 months old you're still a minor.
Also a mutant.


And at that point being a sex offender is the least of your concerns.

You could be both....
Victrix Fortuna Sapientia

Image
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Post by Snorri1234 »

MeDeFe wrote:
mr. incrediball wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


the difference between 12 and 18 is a little more than a few months.

True, but even if you're 17 years and 11 months old you're still a minor.


True, but this law is about minors younger than 13.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

Ah, there it says "younger than 13" I guess I didn't bother with the headlines before.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Post by Frigidus »

MeDeFe wrote:Ah, there it says "younger than 13" I guess I didn't bother with the headlines before.


In a way that still leaves frenching 14-year olds open. Creepy.
User avatar
Harry Redknapp
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:57 pm

Post by Harry Redknapp »

Jesus....now I'm not allowed to sleep with miners??? This fucking government!

Image

Try and stop me, bloody US senators! Then we'd see fucking WW3
User avatar
autoload
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am
Gender: Male

Post by autoload »

MeDeFe wrote:Ah, there it says "younger than 13" I guess I didn't bother with the headlines before.


Image
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

autoload wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Ah, there it says "younger than 13" I guess I didn't bother with the headlines before.

Image

I read the article that was linked to in the first post, and I figured the important bits would be in the text and not in the headlines, guess I was wrong, but then again, it was Fox so the fault is probably mine for not adjusting my expectations.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
william18
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:45 pm
Gender: Male

Post by william18 »

Image
lol
User avatar
UCAbears
Posts: 3199
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Madagascar
Contact:

Post by UCAbears »

MeDeFe wrote:I wonder when the first 18 year olds will feel the righteous wrath of the law for kissing their partner who is a few months younger.


Your telling me... But really, who's gonna know besides parents and shit if your a couple years younger than your lover. I'm 4 years younger but who gives shit about that. Now a 62 and 10 is just weird and wrong and everything else.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”