Conquer Club

George Bush.

What do you think of him?

Mixed feelings, honestly.

Hah yeah. He hasn't done too much good, but I wouldn't put him down with Nixon.

moomaster2000 wrote:Hah yeah. He hasn't done too much good, but I wouldn't put him down with Nixon.

Just don't let xtra see this. He'll lose it completely.

Hahaha!

just trying to start a conversation while pissing them off...


pfft... Politics...

where is the "fucking hate him" option?

Didnt qualify as an option..

That looks an awful lot like a Basco poll. That is not a good thing, sir.

F1fth wrote:That looks an awful lot like a Basco poll. That is not a good thing, sir.

Except complete opposite opinion.

moomaster2000 wrote:Didnt qualify as an option..

why not?

muy_thaiguy wrote:

F1fth wrote:That looks an awful lot like a Basco poll. That is not a good thing, sir.

Except complete opposite opinion.

Well, granted.

good topic...

hes not the best pres. but hes not the worst, he is doing a good job in iraq.

moomaster2000 wrote:George Bush.

What do you think of him?

If I started, I'd get banned for not using the flame wars.

My opinion of him worsens by the day. RON PAUL '08!!!!!!!

s.xkitten wrote:where is the "fucking hate him" option?

it should be added.

Unit_2 wrote:hes not the best pres. but hes not the worst, he is doing a good job in iraq.

Pretty sure he isn't in Iraq, he sends in mindless drones who are willing to die for their country (how stupid) while he sits comfortably thousands of miles away from combat

Bring back the days when kings, and leaders and the such lead their armies into battle, and were in the front line. That'll stop so many wars from starting i bet

Unit_2 wrote:hes not the best pres. but hes not the worst, he is doing a good job in iraq.

explain.

He started out good. Got lazy and stopped communicating his agenda to the American people. He just assumed the public would stay on his side after 9/11. Eventually he abandoned his base of support and lost the Congress because of that apathy. Now he's trying to at least hold steady with conservatives within his party because there's a presidential election coming next year.

Overall: Average

The Weird One wrote:

Unit_2 wrote:hes not the best pres. but hes not the worst, he is doing a good job in iraq.

explain.

I'm sorry, I should've been more specific.

Fixed.

radiojake wrote:

Unit_2 wrote:hes not the best pres. but hes not the worst, he is doing a good job in iraq.

Pretty sure he isn't in Iraq, he sends in mindless drones who are willing to die for their country (how stupid) while he sits comfortably thousands of miles away from combat

Bring back the days when kings, and leaders and the such lead their armies into battle, and were in the front line. That'll stop so many wars from starting i bet

Richard the Lionheart mean anything to you? He was hardly in England most of his rule. He was usually off fighting a war with France or Saladin. Also, Alexander's campaign. He was a King, yet his wars only ended because he died. Not to mention the numerous battles of the Middle Ages and in Ancient History where the leader never stepped onto a battlefield yet sent armies to do the samething? Probably alot more then today.

of course. but today, we're stuck with beurocratic sissies who wouldn't lead an army. (generalization, I know. and I agree with MTG on this one)

Greatest president, nice Colbert reference.

LOL @ everyone who didn't notice that.


I ask my government teacher this on a daily basis. I think he's getting sick of it, but it just gives me so much amusement.

I also LOLed. Although I doubt it makes your teacher as self-conscious as Colbert's guests.