Farkas1111[warned]sn

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Post Reply
User avatar
Wizard2010
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania

Farkas1111[warned]sn

Post by Wizard2010 »

Accused: Ratings abuse

Please rid CC of this bad apple. His intentions are scripted on his wall:

"My new policy on ratings and foeing: If you kill me and take my cards, I'll Foe you and leave you horrible rating. If I don't like your name, I'll do the same. If you lose to me but it was difficult killing you ditto, If I kill you but it was too easy ...yep same. If you conspire with me to take another guy out, Yep Foe and shit rating. If you conspire with another to take me out, well that's a no-brainer of course you're Foed and shit rating. In fact if you ever play a game with me 2 player or otherwise I will Foe you and leave u shit rating. My goal is to Foe all of CC and leave Everyone a Shit rating. Looking forward to playing you."

Based upon the rating he doles out, he's remarkably consistent.


Can you provide me with at least 5 ratings fundamental to this story?

sniff
Image
H2over
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:26 am
Location: Wiltshire
Contact:

Re: Farkas1111

Post by H2over »

Wizard, you could at least give us a link to the player so we can foe him now!?
clangfield
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kent, UK

Re: Farkas1111

Post by clangfield »

H2over wrote:Wizard, you could at least give us a link to the player so we can foe him now!?


This ought to do it:
[player]farkas1111[/player]
Foed already.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Symmetry »

Urgh, another unsubstantiated claim from the Magnificent Bastard clan, at least this one is vaguely interesting as it boils down to a request that the mods find evidence, rather than them investigate evidence provided.

Anyway, here's a link to the ratings left page:
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=Farkas1111

A quick scan found that while he seems overly harsh, he wasn't breaking a rule in any of the examples I looked at. It wasn't an in depth look, but then again, the report didn't actually report any ratings abuse to look at.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Artimis
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Artimis »

Wizard2010 wrote:
Accused: Ratings abuse

Please rid CC of this bad apple. His intentions are scripted on his wall:

"My new policy on ratings and foeing: If you kill me and take my cards, I'll Foe you and leave you horrible rating. If I don't like your name, I'll do the same. If you lose to me but it was difficult killing you ditto, If I kill you but it was too easy ...yep same. If you conspire with me to take another guy out, Yep Foe and shit rating. If you conspire with another to take me out, well that's a no-brainer of course you're Foed and shit rating. In fact if you ever play a game with me 2 player or otherwise I will Foe you and leave u shit rating. My goal is to Foe all of CC and leave Everyone a Shit rating. Looking forward to playing you."

Based upon the rating he doles out, he's remarkably consistent.


Can you provide me with at least 5 ratings fundamental to this story?

sniff


So basically everyone has a 100% chance to get foed(too bad) and rated inappropriately. I was hoping my foe list would stay empty for a while longer, what a shame ....... :|
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Symmetry »

Artimis wrote:
Wizard2010 wrote:
Accused: Ratings abuse

Please rid CC of this bad apple. His intentions are scripted on his wall:

"My new policy on ratings and foeing: If you kill me and take my cards, I'll Foe you and leave you horrible rating. If I don't like your name, I'll do the same. If you lose to me but it was difficult killing you ditto, If I kill you but it was too easy ...yep same. If you conspire with me to take another guy out, Yep Foe and shit rating. If you conspire with another to take me out, well that's a no-brainer of course you're Foed and shit rating. In fact if you ever play a game with me 2 player or otherwise I will Foe you and leave u shit rating. My goal is to Foe all of CC and leave Everyone a Shit rating. Looking forward to playing you."

Based upon the rating he doles out, he's remarkably consistent.


Can you provide me with at least 5 ratings fundamental to this story?

sniff


So basically everyone has a 100% chance to get foed(too bad) and rated inappropriately. I was hoping my foe list would stay empty for a while longer, what a shame ....... :|


The problem with this is that the rating system is tough to read related to a specific game. Clearly the guy was BSing on his wall, though he also clearly mainly rates negatively. Avoidance is the best option, the report doesn't justify anything other than a note at the mo.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Wizard2010
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:34 am
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Wizard2010 »

Symmetry,

I actually figured this was a public service by illuminating what was seemingly obvious - except to Symmetry. We Magnificent Bastards care about keeping you busy Symmetry, by providing you the opportunity to make commentary. Love and devotion are our primary motives. Have a blessed day old chum.
Image
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Symmetry »

Wizard2010 wrote:Symmetry,

I actually figured this was a public service by illuminating what was seemingly obvious - except to Symmetry. We Magnificent Bastards care about keeping you busy Symmetry, by providing you the opportunity to make commentary. Love and devotion are our primary motives. Have a blessed day old chum.


Nah, it was a C&A report. My experience of your clan has mostly been that you guys like to make pleading requests to the mods because you can't sort out even something as basic a C&A form.

You Magnificent Bastard you.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Artimis
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:09 am
Gender: Male
Location: Right behind ya!!! >:D

Re: Farkas1111

Post by Artimis »

Farkas1111on's Wall Post wrote:I Foe all Pussy's that can't take a fucking joke

by Farkas1111on Fri Nov 15, 2013 5:08 am


Your ratings left page says otherwise:
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=Farkas1111
==================================================
This post was sponsored by Far-Q Industries.

Far-Q Industries: Telling you where to go since 2008.
sniffie
Posts: 1715
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:29 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Farkas1111[warned]sn

Post by sniffie »

Of course, I do not know the exact Foe list of this player, but I have warned him for Ratings abuse.

Sniff

p.s. I noticed that in stead of a reply, I have edited the OP's post by accident.
User avatar
Vid_FISO
Posts: 1351
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Hants

Re: Farkas1111[warned]sn

Post by Vid_FISO »

sniffie wrote:
p.s. I noticed that in stead of a reply, I have edited the OP's post by accident.


If you notice quickly enough the back button saves you.
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through
Post Reply

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”