jerkface1 & rep3 [noted]

[cmorganuk]

Accused:

[player]jerkface1[/player]
[player]rep3[/player]




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

[game]Game 9883640[/game]

Comments:

6 player game, earlish stages, me and jerkface 1 were two of the stronger players in the game, rep3 was quite weak. rep3, for no apparent reason decided to use what few troops me had to smash through one of my borders and break me up. I thought it was a strange move, but ok fair enough I have to respect that he's entitled to do what he wants. Then about 4-5 rounds later he done the same move again. I looked in the log to see if I'd antaginised him previously, but I hadn't and his tactics made no sense. I smelt a rat so looked up his previous games and saw that he plays alot with jerkface1, often in team games togeather and on the same team. He blatently sacrificed himself to give jerkface one the upperhand in our game. It worked.

[agentcom]

They are teammates in a lot of games. Plus they have a lot of games played together, yet there is no sign of communication between them either on their walls or in game chat. So this is kind of odd. Mods might want to look at PMs if they can do so.

[king achilles]

rep3 is in neighbors with you, pink and yellow in the north side of the map. One way or the other, one of you will have to decide to attack. Like right now, we can see that yellow has 15 troops on Kutchin, what if decides to attack one of you with it? Let's say he's tired of being limited to very few territories in a no spoils game so he takes a big risk. Will the one he attacks cry secret diplomacy or foul? Maybe that would exactly happen if he does that. Should pink take Kitaamiut and face red in nina? Or should he give it to teal and serve as a cushion against red? Although I can see some point in what is being implied, I think we would need more than this to clarify a secret collision between the two. This shall be noted for future reference.