Extreme Global Warming [Quenched]

pepperonibread · Post by **pepperonibread** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:52 am

Latest Update (see pg. 35 for full details):

Ending Poll Results:

European bonus?
3
9% [ 16 ]
4
47% [ 81 ]
5
35% [ 60 ]
6
8% [ 14 ]

Total Votes : 171

Original:

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:53 am

you can't use a website as image, use only the image please:

this is what you meant:

pepperonibread · Post by **pepperonibread** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:55 am

like this?

Jack0827 · Post by **Jack0827** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:27 am

nice map it needs alot of work but it should be good

wrightfan123 · Post by **wrightfan123** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:48 am

Jack0827 wrote:nice map it needs alot of work but it should be good

How so? Wade, ignore thus imposter and quench it.

xDestructionx · Post by **xDestructionx** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:22 am

i think that the continent bonuses shuld be more accurate; north america has more countries tan asian, and yet they both hav the same bonus. also, i think that there shuld be a bonus wenever u occupy all of the ocean ports. but other thanthat, sweet map!!

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:08 am

Yeah keep working on this, should be sweet.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:29 am

IM sorry, but i dont like it at all. I get enough global warming every day from the news and websites, and i dont think we need a CC map adding to it.

pepperonibread · Post by **pepperonibread** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:45 am

ok, when i do this:

is the picture of the map coming up?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:50 am

Not for me, no.

Balsiefen · Post by **Balsiefen** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:17 pm

You want

Code: Select all

[img]http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8163/whitemap3jpegwe4.jpg[/img]

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:03 pm

If this is global warming, shouldnt Antarctica be smaller? Not bigger, thats for sure.

joystickgenie · Post by **joystickgenie** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:04 pm

I wanted to make this map. I just couldn’t find a good topographical map of the world to base it on. I even posted the ties in the ideas thread. So yeah I support this map:)

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:07 pm

Great map - get started please

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:08 pm

This map is a liberal conspiracy...

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:13 pm

But I do agree that bonuses need to be adjusted:

N. America worth more
Antartica worth more

Also, I see there is one name to 2 countries in N. America

wrightfan123 · Post by **wrightfan123** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:21 pm

Guiscard wrote:This map is a liberal conspiracy...

lol

wrightfan123 · Post by **wrightfan123** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:40 pm

RobinJ wrote:But I do agree that bonuses need to be adjusted:

N. America worth more
Antartica worth more

Also, I see there is one name to 2 countries in N. America

Yea, Wade, you have Prairies spanning two countries; is it supposed to be like that?

pepperonibread · Post by **pepperonibread** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:49 pm

yep, i know. i'll fix it

Spockers · Post by **Spockers** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 5:45 pm

This map looks messy and confusing, and not different enough from the classic map to have any appeal whatsoever.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:49 pm

i really don't understand why most of europe is under water (including some mountains) but some small islands are still there :shock:

at the moment i don't like this map because it is highly innacurate. some high areas are underwater and other low ones still exist.

and second, i don't like the map because it has the same playability as classic map or world 2.1

PS: i really hate the red band across the map.

mibi · Post by **mibi** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:13 pm

why is the antarctic so big? am i missing something about global warming ?

pepperonibread · Post by **pepperonibread** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:33 pm

ok, i based this map on an elevation map and put all the green (lowest elevation) under water. and antarctica is a land mass, not like the polar ice caps of the north. the ice would melt off it, but the land would still be there

Jack0827 · Post by **Jack0827** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:27 pm

wrightfan123 wrote:
Guiscard wrote:This map is a liberal conspiracy...

lol

ya it is

PimpCaneYoAss · Post by **PimpCaneYoAss** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:54 pm

Heres an example of a map of the future...

Maybe take some advice from that. Maybe it can help. Otherwise i love the map. great idea was thinking about it myself.

and to respond to DiM's comment, it has to deal with areas closet to the ice caps as well.