Map requiring least amount of luck?

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
jleonnn
Posts: 1808
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:11 am
Gender: Male
Location: The Communist Republic of Aoria

Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by jleonnn »

What map on CC requires the least amount of luck?
jammyjames
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by jammyjames »

City Mogul.. Huge troop numbers
Image
User avatar
Seulessliathan
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:52 am

Re: Map

Post by Seulessliathan »

City Mogul was created to limit the luck factor. Huge maps usually depend less on luck than small maps. Luck of drop isn´t involved on conquer maps like AOR.
benga
Posts: 6925
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 pm

Re: Map

Post by benga »

jammyjames wrote:City Mogul.. Huge troop numbers


LOL?
User avatar
40kguy
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:39 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by 40kguy »

jammyjames wrote:City Mogul.. Huge troop numbers

If you play freestyle speed, it is all skill very little luck

If you play sequential, who goes first wins.
Image
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
User avatar
Caymanmew
Clan Director
Clan Director
Posts: 3232
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:54 am
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa

Re: Map

Post by Caymanmew »

40kguy wrote:
jammyjames wrote:City Mogul.. Huge troop numbers

If you play freestyle speed, it is all skill very little luck

If you play sequential, who goes first wins.


freestyle speed is 25% skill 75% speed

all you need is some strategy and insane speed.
Image
User avatar
rdsrds2120
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by rdsrds2120 »

caymanmew wrote:
40kguy wrote:
jammyjames wrote:City Mogul.. Huge troop numbers

If you play freestyle speed, it is all skill very little luck

If you play sequential, who goes first wins.


freestyle speed is 25% skill 75% speed

all you need is some strategy and insane speed.


He didn't say speed freestyle or not. Even then, speed fs isn't all about speed.

-rd
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Map

Post by natty dread »

Yes he did. It's even in your quote.
Image
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: Map

Post by lord voldemort »

Seulessliathan wrote:City Mogul was created to limit the luck factor. Huge maps usually depend less on luck than small maps. Luck of drop isn´t involved on conquer maps like AOR.

yer thats not true at all...
drop is fairly impotant on aor
Image
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: Map

Post by Qwert »

i play several time frestule, and its all abouth speed,or if you manage to play very fast 2 round in row, no skill in fresstule,just speed and speed in play.
No frestule games its much better to show skill.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
40kguy
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:39 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by 40kguy »

qwert wrote:i play several time frestule, and its all abouth speed,or if you manage to play very fast 2 round in row, no skill in fresstule,just speed and speed in play.
No frestule games its much better to show skill.

freestyle shows thinking on your feet

when ever i play 8 player games people might go for an elimination and you have maybe 2 seconds to react.
Image
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
User avatar
rdsrds2120
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by rdsrds2120 »

natty_dread wrote:Yes he did. It's even in your quote.


oops, my bad.

-rd
User avatar
Crazyirishman
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dongbei China

Re: Map

Post by Crazyirishman »

Believe it or not, I think Japan is a very fair map. I don't usually see lopsided drops and if the dice are unkind early, it is a good map to mount a comeback on because of its set up.
User avatar
HighlanderAttack
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map

Post by HighlanderAttack »

small maps with nuclear spoils can make for some really long competitive games--1v1
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Master Fenrir
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:40 am

Re: Map

Post by Master Fenrir »

jleonnn wrote:What map on CC requires the least amount of luck?

For what? 1 vs. 1 games, or just in general?
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: Map

Post by AndyDufresne »

Master Fenrir wrote:
jleonnn wrote:What map on CC requires the least amount of luck?

For what? 1 vs. 1 games, or just in general?

Germany is a good map for 1vs1 games, and I think it is pretty luck-neutral, though there are probably a few better ones out there.


--Andy
User avatar
Commander62890
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:52 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Commander62890 »

AndyDufresne wrote:
Master Fenrir wrote:
jleonnn wrote:What map on CC requires the least amount of luck?

For what? 1 vs. 1 games, or just in general?

Germany is a good map for 1vs1 games, and I think it is pretty luck-neutral, though there are probably a few better ones out there.

It may be drop-neutral, but it certainly isn't luck-neutral.
If both players can play a map equally well, then it's ALL luck... and Germany is an easy map to play.

I think that the most luck-neutral map is the one that requires the most strategy to win, and the one that is most difficult to master.

Think about it; if a Das Schloss specialist plays someone that rarely plays Das Schloss, he has a decent chance of winning, even if he gets worse luck. Meanwhile, if a Germany specialist plays someone that rarely plays Germany, he will hardly ever win if he gets worse luck.
User avatar
safariguy5
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: Map

Post by safariguy5 »

40kguy wrote:
qwert wrote:i play several time frestule, and its all abouth speed,or if you manage to play very fast 2 round in row, no skill in fresstule,just speed and speed in play.
No frestule games its much better to show skill.

freestyle shows thinking on your feet

when ever i play 8 player games people might go for an elimination and you have maybe 2 seconds to react.

So then it's how fast your internet connection is vs the opposition to see who can react the fastest?

Freestyle, I don't see how speed doesn't play a role. And speed doesn't equal skill.

I'd say a conquest style map requires the least amount of skill, feudal epic probably being the "fairest" conquest map in my opinion.
Image
User avatar
Commander62890
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:52 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Map

Post by Commander62890 »

safariguy5 wrote: And speed doesn't equal skill.

heh, it also doesn't equal luck... so I guess you could make a case that speed freestyle involves the least amount of luck, but not the most amount of skill.
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by AndyDufresne »

Commander62890 wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Master Fenrir wrote:
jleonnn wrote:What map on CC requires the least amount of luck?

For what? 1 vs. 1 games, or just in general?

Germany is a good map for 1vs1 games, and I think it is pretty luck-neutral, though there are probably a few better ones out there.

It may be drop-neutral, but it certainly isn't luck-neutral.
If both players can play a map equally well, then it's ALL luck... and Germany is an easy map to play.

I think that the most luck-neutral map is the one that requires the most strategy to win, and the one that is most difficult to master.

Think about it; if a Das Schloss specialist plays someone that rarely plays Das Schloss, he has a decent chance of winning, even if he gets worse luck. Meanwhile, if a Germany specialist plays someone that rarely plays Germany, he will hardly ever win if he gets worse luck.


So in your mind, enhanced strategy (outside of normal game mechanics?) = luck neutral?


--Andy
User avatar
stahrgazer
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Gender: Female
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by stahrgazer »

AndyDufresne wrote:So in your mind, enhanced strategy (outside of normal game mechanics?) = luck neutral?


Whether he agrees or not, I do agree with this. Skill only comes into play when luck is approximately equal on both sides at the appropriate times on a map. Someone who gets all the "good dice" early on on most maps is likely to beat the player whose dice are disgusting for the first several rounds.

Thus, the maps that require the least amount of luck are maps where a player with "bad luck" for several of the early rounds is less likely to be overwhelmed by the other player's "good luck," in early rounds; which means maps where bonuses are small and there are many ways to hit important targets.

For this reason, maps like Stalingrad require the least amount of luck. On Stalingrad, players rarely take large bonuses and most regions can be assaulted or bombarded from several regions around the board, which means a variety of strategies can be employed to compensate for less-than-nice dice, and the player is likely to keep at least a few of those high-reach regions for long enough to make a difference when the luck turns back. However, if the drop and dice variance are too great (meaning, if luck is TOO one-sided) then even the best strategy will not compensate for getting 1's and 2's v. the opponent's 5's and 6's for "too many rounds in a row."
Image
User avatar
Commander62890
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:52 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Commander62890 »

If two players are very good and both know the map well, then the main influences upon the game will be drop and dice.

However, if one player does not know a certain map (or setting) well, he or she is more liable to make a mistake.
This means that the player who wins will often have won due to superior strategy, not luck.

On small, simple maps, the person who wins will more often have won due to luck than on large, complex maps.
User avatar
safariguy5
Posts: 1449
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: California

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by safariguy5 »

Commander62890 wrote:If two players are very good and both know the map well, then the main influences upon the game will be drop and dice.

However, if one player does not know a certain map (or setting) well, he or she is more liable to make a mistake.
This means that the player who wins will often have won due to superior strategy, not luck.

On small, simple maps, the person who wins will more often have won due to luck than on large, complex maps.

That depends on whether or not we're talking about 1v1. On a large map 1v1, the person with the first turn generally can take 3 or more regions from the other person, reducing their opponent's region bonus by 1 or more. Over the course of a game, this usually means the person who went first wins. Hive being an extreme example, but maps like Waterloo also tend to favor the player who goes first.
Image
User avatar
Commander62890
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 1:52 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by Commander62890 »

safariguy5 wrote:On a large map 1v1, the person with the first turn generally can take 3 or more regions from the other person, reducing their opponent's region bonus by 1 or more. Over the course of a game, this usually means the person who went first wins. Hive being an extreme example, but maps like Waterloo also tend to favor the player who goes first.

True... I think 17 would be ideal for a 1v1.

Reducing the impact of the drop is indeed a major factor in reducing the "amount of luck" on a map.
jammyjames
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 am
Gender: Male

Re: Map requiring least amount of luck?

Post by jammyjames »

Commander62890 wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:On a large map 1v1, the person with the first turn generally can take 3 or more regions from the other person, reducing their opponent's region bonus by 1 or more. Over the course of a game, this usually means the person who went first wins. Hive being an extreme example, but maps like Waterloo also tend to favor the player who goes first.

True... I think 17 would be ideal for a 1v1.

Reducing the impact of the drop is indeed a major factor in reducing the "amount of luck" on a map.


leading back to my original point of city mogul. Zero need for dice on that map, based a whole lot more on strategy
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”