breaking truces

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Kiron
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:46 pm

breaking truces

Post by Kiron »

I have been playing games. When truces are made, people seemed to be upset when they are broken. That's understandable. However, what if you can win a game with 90%+ confidence by breaking a truce? I understand if you break a truce for something insignificant like a bonus or something...but the game?
User avatar
dwilhelmi
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:05 am
Gender: Male

Re: breaking truces

Post by dwilhelmi »

I think that if keeping a truce will cause you to lose the game definitively, then it is understandable to break it. Other than that, I would have to call foul. You make a deal with an opponent, you should stick to the terms, period. I would consider getting a win in this fashion to be an underhanded win.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

Kiron wrote:I have been playing games. When truces are made, people seemed to be upset when they are broken. That's understandable. However, what if you can win a game with 90%+ confidence by breaking a truce? I understand if you break a truce for something insignificant like a bonus or something...but the game?


In my view, as coach Herm Edwards once famously said..."We play to win the game!". If you're CERTAIN that you will win the game, it is your RESPONSIBILITY to break the truce. The other guy surely would understand that and if he doesn't, he's not looking at the situation objectively. I would expect the other guy to do the same. Now, sometimes that "certainty" fails because of the dice - that's unavoidable, but the situation should still be obvious. That being said, the other guy also has a RESPONSIBILITY to claim foul in an effort to rally support against you in that game...but it should be only due to the necessity of trying to stop you.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
KoE_Sirius
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: breaking truces

Post by KoE_Sirius »

Since this game Game 1590682.I have only agreed to border truces.I'm not in the game of letting players win.
He basically held the game objective and I had to stop him.When I did it lead to foe list and all sorts.
Highest Rank 4th.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

KoE_Sirius wrote:Since this game Game 1590682.I have only agreed to border truces.I'm not in the game of letting players win.
He basically held the game objective and I had to stop him.When I did it lead to foe list and all sorts.


Foeing someone for employing good strategy to win a game is retarded.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
FarangDemon
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:36 am
Contact:

Re: breaking truces

Post by FarangDemon »

"There can be only one"
[bigimg]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5248/5370580874_1daec08bb3_b.jpg[/bigimg]
"He came dancin across the water.... FarangDemon, FarangDemon.... mmmhh....what a killer..."
User avatar
Carebian Knight
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:42 pm
Location: Central Missouri

Re: breaking truces

Post by Carebian Knight »

Kiron wrote:I have been playing games. When truces are made, people seemed to be upset when they are broken. That's understandable. However, what if you can win a game with 90%+ confidence by breaking a truce? I understand if you break a truce for something insignificant like a bonus or something...but the game?


Agreed. If you can win the game by breaking the truce, then it needs to be understood when you do. I do believe however, that you should post what you are doing and why as a courtesy to the other player, but not until after you've done it ;)
User avatar
40kguy
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:39 am
Gender: Male

Re: breaking truces

Post by 40kguy »

i think it is a back stab. that's life tho people break deals all the time you just need to grow a pair.
Image
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
danfrank
Posts: 611
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:19 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by danfrank »

Woodruff wrote:Foeing someone for employing good strategy to win a game is retarded.



? Retarded ? Care to explain what that is supposed to mean.. :lol:
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

Carebian Knight wrote:
Kiron wrote:I have been playing games. When truces are made, people seemed to be upset when they are broken. That's understandable. However, what if you can win a game with 90%+ confidence by breaking a truce? I understand if you break a truce for something insignificant like a bonus or something...but the game?


Agreed. If you can win the game by breaking the truce, then it needs to be understood when you do. I do believe however, that you should post what you are doing and why as a courtesy to the other player, but not until after you've done it ;)


I can agree with pointing out why you did it, sure...that makes sense and might help to avoid the hurt feelings.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

danfrank wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Foeing someone for employing good strategy to win a game is retarded.


? Retarded ? Care to explain what that is supposed to mean.. :lol:


Find a dictionary. Retarded: characterized by slowness or limitation in intellectual or emotional development. You could also see "pussified" and "chickenshit".
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
KoE_Sirius
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: breaking truces

Post by KoE_Sirius »

Woodruff wrote:
danfrank wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Foeing someone for employing good strategy to win a game is retarded.


? Retarded ? Care to explain what that is supposed to mean.. :lol:


Find a dictionary. Retarded: characterized by slowness or limitation in intellectual or emotional development. You could also see "pussified" and "chickenshit".

It so not funny to compare these three words in the same context.Besides the latter 2 are not words at all.
Highest Rank 4th.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

KoE_Sirius wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
danfrank wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Foeing someone for employing good strategy to win a game is retarded.


? Retarded ? Care to explain what that is supposed to mean.. :lol:


Find a dictionary. Retarded: characterized by slowness or limitation in intellectual or emotional development. You could also see "pussified" and "chickenshit".

It so not funny to compare these three words in the same context.Besides the latter 2 are not words at all.


In my view, it absolutely is "emotionally limited" to foe someone because they employ good strategy. I would also state that it is just as absolutely "pussified" and "chickenshit". And I used them, so they are words! Ha. <chuckle>
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
KoE_Sirius
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: breaking truces

Post by KoE_Sirius »

well yeah it is a bit daft. lol
Highest Rank 4th.
User avatar
Royal Panda
Posts: 838
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: breaking truces

Post by Royal Panda »

I would only ever enter a truce if it was to help me win the game. Invariably that means breaking it at some point... Anyone who raises a C&A report over a broken truce is a class A moron.
rathmaskalion
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:21 pm

Re: breaking truces

Post by rathmaskalion »

I know this isn't the suggestion forum, but a possible fix for this could be to implement a 'Trustworthiness' rating along with the other ratings that people are given? I realize that 'Fair Play' is probably supposed to cover this, but I don't think that many people really realize that...plus, it would be a more useful piece of information to have than the majority of the other ratings...
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

rathmaskalion wrote:I know this isn't the suggestion forum, but a possible fix for this could be to implement a 'Trustworthiness' rating along with the other ratings that people are given? I realize that 'Fair Play' is probably supposed to cover this, but I don't think that many people really realize that...plus, it would be a more useful piece of information to have than the majority of the other ratings...


What really makes "Trustworthiness" a more accurate indicator of this sort of thing than "Fair Play", though? It seems to me that "Fair Play" or "Cheap Tactics" cover this perfectly well.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
rathmaskalion
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:21 pm

Re: breaking truces

Post by rathmaskalion »

'Fair play', it would seem, includes aspects such as secret diplomacy... 'Cheap Tactics' would cover it, but it requires another mouse click to see (which a lot of people are probably too lazy to do) Just a thought.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

rathmaskalion wrote:'Fair play', it would seem, includes aspects such as secret diplomacy... 'Cheap Tactics' would cover it, but it requires another mouse click to see (which a lot of people are probably too lazy to do) Just a thought.


Another mouse click? Oh...you must have your monitor on a lower resolution.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
KoE_Sirius
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: breaking truces

Post by KoE_Sirius »

Woodruff wrote:
rathmaskalion wrote:'Fair play', it would seem, includes aspects such as secret diplomacy... 'Cheap Tactics' would cover it, but it requires another mouse click to see (which a lot of people are probably too lazy to do) Just a thought.


Another mouse click? Oh...you must have your monitor on a lower resolution.

or playing on an Iphone. lol
Highest Rank 4th.
rathmaskalion
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:21 pm

Re: breaking truces

Post by rathmaskalion »

OK, think about it... First, you need to click on the person's rating score...which would give you the three ratings as well as the overall average... Then you scroll down to see the individual ratings as well as any of the buzzwords attached to them... Then, if the person has more than one page, you have to click to get through that. For a relatively new player, this may not be so straightforward. Please think things through before making fun of the poster.
User avatar
JBlombier
Posts: 1435
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: Gouda

Re: breaking truces

Post by JBlombier »

I've tried to think it through, but I'm not sure I understand you. Are you talking about the rating page, where all the ratings people have left you are? Or about the page where someone produces the rating in the first place?

Because when I leave someone a rating for Fair Play, Game Play and Attitude and then I want to attach some tags, it's not very hard to find those tags. No extra mouseclick or whatever. It's very straightforward, for new players too.

If the person has more than 1 page, you say. I guess you mean the pages of ratings people have left you, but once a player is advanced enough in how this site works to find that rating page, he'll find the second and third page as well, if he really wants to.
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

rathmaskalion wrote:OK, think about it... First, you need to click on the person's rating score...which would give you the three ratings as well as the overall average... Then you scroll down to see the individual ratings as well as any of the buzzwords attached to them... Then, if the person has more than one page, you have to click to get through that. For a relatively new player, this may not be so straightforward. Please think things through before making fun of the poster.


I did think it through. You're not making any sense.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
Posts: 28215
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara

Re: breaking truces

Post by Dukasaur »

"Oathbreaker" or something of that nature should be one of the available tags. "Cheap tactics" probably covers it, sure, but it could also mean a lot of other things too.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: breaking truces

Post by Woodruff »

Dukasaur wrote:"Oathbreaker" or something of that nature should be one of the available tags. "Cheap tactics" probably covers it, sure, but it could also mean a lot of other things too.


What about "Backstabber"? That's already one of the options - seems pretty obvious to me.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Post Reply

Return to “Conquer Club Discussion”