Page 1 of 81

CC'S ALL TIME TOP 100 SCORES

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:53 pm
by Blitzaholic

NEW + UPDATED on updated Jan 27, 2023 Thank you to blitzaholic and JOHNNYROCKET24

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Only the first post to this thread will be edited and contain the up to date information. New high scores must be sent to me via PM with the proof that you have achieved it. A snapshot will be fine. Please do not just post " I had a 3956 ". This will not be accepted if I do not see it on the scoreboard.
I can be flexible with this, I'd rather not have my inbox flooded, but, a post in here, and some confirmation!

THE TOP 100 HIGHEST SCORES
"since the beginning of time"

(updated Jan 27th, 2023)


Note: not 100% accurate, only top 5 has been updated at this stage

CC's 5000 Point Club in color






1. [player]josko.ri[/player] 6402
2. [player]King_Herpes[/player] 6351
3. [player]Sjnap[/player] 6102
4. [player]narutoserigala[/player] 6033
5. [player]Karelpietertje[/player] 5969
[player]Fusibaseball[/player] 5908
6. [player]Blitzaholic[/player] 5740
7. [player]fusibaseball[/player] 5707
8. [player]Scott-Land[/player] 5522


[player]Kaskavel[/player] 5365
9. [player]thebest712[/player] 5321
[player]mc05025[/player] - 5257
10. [player]KingofGods[/player] 5211
11. [player]Poo-Maker[/player] 5205
12. [player]Demonfork[/player] 5158
[player]Cheffed[/player] - 5129
13. [player]Emmdizzle[/player] 5123
14. [player]ljex[/player] 5117
15, [player]random21[/player] 5082
16. [player]SkyT[/player] 5075
[player]Jalijoo[/player] 5054
[player]TrafalgarLaw01[/player] 5004



13. [player]Rabbiton[/player] 4981
14. [player]bridge2far[/player] 4801
15. [player]Mhennigan[/player] 4797
[player]DerStaufer[/player] 4788
16. [player]lt.pie[/player] 4787
17. [player]RashidJelzin[/player] 4779
18. [player]Thai Robert[/player] 4752
19. [player]Velvecarrots[/player] 4660
20. [player]ccatman[/player] 4596
[player]Lingfish[/player] 4589
21. [player]Buizerd[/player] 4575
22. [player]Malabrosse[/player] 4491

23. [player]Prankcall[/player] 4456
24. [player]pimphawks70[/player] 4430
25. [player]Kiron[/player] 4420
26. [player]David Hoekstra[/player] 4404
27. [player]Prismsaber[/player] 4383
28. [player]Chariot of Fire[/player] 4380
29. [player]General Mojo[/player] 4366
30. [player]Comic Boy[/player] 4340




31. [player]Dustine[/player] 4310
32. [player]Master Fenrir[/player] 4282
33. [player]Gustaf Wasa[/player] 4251
33. [player]Hesoos[/player] 4251
35. [player]Skillerman[/player] 4198
36. [player]Laddida[/player] 4192
37. [player]Chephren[/player] 4168
38. [player]xiangwang[/player] 4168
39. [player]Timmy1[/player] 4136
40. [player]Seulessliathan[/player] 4131
41. [player]ahunda[/player] 4092
42. [player]Thomas.Paine[/player] 4091
43. [player]billy07[/player] 4070
44. [player]Fantasianasian[/player] 4060
45. [player]Aaarrrrggh[/player] 4049
46. [player]dvlajko[/player] 4045
47. [player]LFAW[/player] 4042
48. [player]ballenus[/player] 4015
49. [player]Loes[/player] 4008
50. [player]Jboy[/player] 4007




51. [player]ManBungalow[/player] 4003
52. [player]Chao[/player] 4001
53. [player]JOHNNYROCKET24[/player] 3969
54. [player]Draq[/player] 3960
55. [player]Fruitcake[/player] 3953
56. [player]PJDH[/player] 3922
57. [player]Rl_Orange[/player] 3919
58. [player]jarrett155[/player] 3917
59. [player]josko.ri[/player] 3875
60. [player]Big Whiskey[/player] 3868
60. [player]Phlaim[/player] 3868
62. [player]thezepman[/player] 3863
63. [player]Yosevuk[/player] 3858
63. [player]Phatscotty[/player] 3858
65. [player]merida[/player] 3839
66. [player]Gibbom[/player] 3838
67. [player]FabledIntegral[/player] 3810
68. [player]JustB[/player] 3807
70. [player]Myrelock[/player] 3801

71. [player]3Asefa[/player] 3800
72. [player]Egel[/player] 3786
73. [player]Maniacmath17[/player] 3785
74. [player]astompel[/player] 3776
75. [player]eyestone[/player] 3771
76. [player]Me-Da-MiNoRiTY[/player] 3765
77. [player]dividedbyzero[/player] 3758
78. [player]agonzos[/player] 3753
79. [player]Teylen[/player] 3748
80. [player]Naato[/player] 3735
81. [player]Karlo Veliki[/player] 3734
82. [player]Beadle[/player] 3731
83. [player]Commander62890[/player] 3730
84. [player]kumanovac[/player] 3724
85. [player]laughingcavalier[/player] 3722
86. [player]Greatwhite[/player] 3720
86. [player]jbeaver[/player] 3720
88. [player]Bilbo[/player] 3719
89. [player]David_Wain[/player] 3717
90. [player]Mike Doherty[/player] 3712
91. [player]Gwaahjo[/player] 3701
92. [player]Merz[/player] 3699
93. [player]roadwarrior[/player]3697
93. [player]Sam02[/player] 3697
95. [player]Masli[/player] 3689
96. [player]Dako[/player] 3687
97. [player]agonzos[/player] 3681
98. [player]wldearme[/player] 3667
99. [player]BoganGod[/player] 3666
99. [player]waseemalim[/player] 3666

so close, yet so far!!!!!

[player]AMGecko[/player] 3663
[player]Crash_22[/player] 3659
[player]FarangDemon[/player] 3651
[player]djt5483[/player] 3645
[player]Rodion[/player] 3632
[player]GallantPellham[/player] 3630
[player]Torcav2[/player] 3625
[player]Likemee[/player] 3616
[player]jac99[/player] 3607


/

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:15 pm
by AK_iceman
Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:14 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?


delete the other thread

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:01 am
by alex_white101
this one was created second............ delete this one :roll:

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:10 pm
by AAFitz
AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?


JR, i completely agree. You post far too much in the forum. This thread will easily overload the system, and ruin CC. You post far too much in here as it is. You have almost 250 posts. That is utterly ridiculous. Please be more responsible in the future. Use a little restraint. You only have played 2300 games or so. What makes you think you can post so many times...geez

AK has 4800 posts, but im sure every one is absolutely necessary


Leave them both...natural selection will kill off useless threads. Nothing wrong with cleaning one up once in a while in my opinion. Delete them when theyre dead if its a matter of space. If its a matter of confusion. Anyone who cant tell the difference, probably isnt on the list anyways...

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:14 pm
by Coleman
AAFitz wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?


JR, i completely agree. You post far too much in the forum. This thread will easily overload the system, and ruin CC. You post far too much in here as it is. You have almost 250 posts. That is utterly ridiculous. Please be more responsible in the future. Use a little restraint. You only have played 2300 games or so. What makes you think you can post so many times...geez

AK has 4800 posts, but im sure every one is absolutely necessary


Leave them both...natural selection will kill off useless threads. Nothing wrong with cleaning one up once in a while in my opinion. Delete them when theyre dead if its a matter of space. If its a matter of confusion. Anyone who cant tell the difference, probably isnt on the list anyways...

=D>

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:18 pm
by Aries
I'd just like you all to notice that I wasn't on that list :lol: Although I will be sometime in the future.................... :wink:

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:30 pm
by Robinette
alex_white101 wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?


delete the other thread


this one was created second............ delete this one


Well, it looks like the 1st one was deleted :(
Sad, it was like a bazillion pages and about 4000 views...
But it was an ill-fated venture from the beginning, being bounced to the social lounge several times... maybe it still lurks somewhere in the soft under-belly of CC archives... waiting to strike back when we least expect it. Or perhaps it was mercielessly hacked into little pieces by a penguin and buried under the snow in the remote Alaskan wilderness.

Please observe a moment of silence for those posts than can no longer be with us... may they rest in peace. :cry:

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:34 pm
by AAFitz
Did they seriously delete that?

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:36 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:37 pm
by wrightfan123
AAFitz wrote:Did they seriously delete that?


You heard what the man siad, that's what he said!

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:38 pm
by AAFitz
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.


Exactly...if it was useless it would have died.... theres 1000 useless threads in here, and that one was slated? Hypocrisy clearly has no bounds

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:41 pm
by Robinette
AAFitz wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.


Exactly...if it was useless it would have died.... theres 1000 useless threads in here, and that one was slated? Hypocracy clearly has no bounds


Perhaps there is a strong bias against such recordkeeping by the administration for this site... YA THINK :!: :?: :!: :?:

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:53 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
well there is 17,000 Dugcarr and Jamie threads filling up the space. delete them.

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:04 pm
by AAFitz
Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:41 pm
by Robinette
AAFitz wrote:Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

=D> well said

So come on AK_Iceman, do the right thing and put it back..... please

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:23 pm
by AAFitz
I myself am not trying to be this negative here, but if these posts are going to be just deleted randomly, and seemingly arbitrarily, I wont waste my time with them. If theres a new post reduction policy, by all means let us know the constraints, but if you want to save space perhaps start by deleting the ones that are a year old...and not ones that are clearly active

Its only the arbitrary nature of this that Im questioning...

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:06 pm
by reverend_kyle
I find it funny you guys are whining, because he said the reason he posted this was because of all the useless quotes in the other one or something.

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:04 pm
by AK_iceman
I just asked why 2 threads were needed for the same exact topic. The answer I got was to delete the first one, so I did.

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:51 am
by AAFitz
AK_iceman wrote:I just asked why 2 threads were needed for the same exact topic. The answer I got was to delete the first one, so I did.


If JR made the other thread, then no big deal, but I was assuming it was Robinette that started the other one... if so, theres a few threads Id like you to delete too...Ill give you a list...If it was JR that started the other one...then Im totally wrong here, because he did start it, not to say that that means he owns it, but that at least makes sense

And Kyle, this isnt whining, AK likes to go around and post about useless threads, and has as many as anyone...

CC'S ALL TIME TOP SCORES

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:14 pm
by Blitzaholic
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
THE TOP 10 HIGHEST SCORES
"since the beginning of time"

(updated April 25, 2007)

1. Blitzaholic 4386
2. Jork 3425
3. Eye84free 3412
4. Belzbub 3384
5. JOHNNYROCKET 3383


6. Stronger 3368
7. osujacket 3231
8. Steelplayin 3222
9. yosevuk 3198
10. Maniacmath 3185


And for fun...
Here's the high water marks for all others who have made general...

"in all of recorded history"


11. Dugcarr1 3174 *banned for being a griefer*

12. scorba 3167
13. Nuke 3160
14. Pheared 3158
15. eddymush 3150

16. Lazaruslong 3147
17. Cyberdaniel 3145
18. Theblackrose 3114
19. Subjekt 3114
20. Andrewb 3107


21. RL_Orange 3088
22. Juventino 3079
23. Pilate 3055
24. Alstergren 3048
25. marvaddin 3033
26. Robinette :wink: 3021
27. dminus 3002 *multi*


Held the # 1 Spot while being over 3K in points the longest in CC History since it's Inception: Only 6 Ever to do it!

1. Blitzaholic 170 days
2. Pilate 39 days
3. Belzbub 17 days
4. Alstergren 14 days
5. Jork 4 days
6. Eye84free 3 days

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:19 pm
by Blitzaholic
Robinette wrote:
Perhaps there is a strong bias against such recordkeeping by the administration for this site... YA THINK :!: :?: :!: :?:


:lol: there really shouldn't be, plenty of players love the stats, i think it adds more to the site's overall competitiveness.

Create more Robin :D

JR

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:38 pm
by Blitzaholic
I never checked, but I would guess 64 percent waiting rate is not a CC record? I am guessing I have higher than that, and perhaps some others as well, although I never checked.

There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.

Re: JR

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:53 pm
by AK_iceman
Blitzaholic wrote:There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.

1000 games as a minimum for what? Thats a hell of a lot of games, and I think only 20 people or so have played that many.

Re: JR

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:56 pm
by sully800
Blitzaholic wrote:I never checked, but I would guess 64 percent waiting rate is not a CC record? I am guessing I have higher than that, and perhaps some others as well, although I never checked.

There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.


Yeah, there are obviously new players that have 100% win records- that all goes back to the extremely small sample size. I think once you get over 100 games or so the win% is more reflective of its long run value. Of course its hard to set an arbitrary mark from where numbers go from being a small set to a large set.