matthewpiv , jeffire [cleared]es

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Post Reply
lurp
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:41 pm
Contact:

matthewpiv , jeffire [cleared]es

Post by lurp »

Accused:

[player]matthewpiv[/player]
[player]jeffire[/player]
[player]xxxxxxx[/player]



The accused are suspected of
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 6471409




Comments: very simply these guys have some secret diplomacy no reason for either not to attack each other especially now.
User avatar
Frankly, my dear
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:02 pm
Gender: Male

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by Frankly, my dear »

I have been watching the game and there is no way secret diplomacy going on. You control Aussie, have a massive chunk on Bangkok, OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO WORK TOGETHER.... THEY HAVE TO FOR SURVIVAL!

Case Closed.

Edit* If no words are exchanged in chat, and they move all of their troops away from each others borders, then you may have a case. They are defending against each other and fighting you.

BTW, if you don't win, you are a total noob.
lurp
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by lurp »

uhhhhh ok they went atleast 4-5 turns with no armies on us sa border and 10 -1 on europe usa border and green just reemed blue and blu never attacked back some bs i suspect but i will win total noob lol i challenge you to heads up classic game anyday or 4 person classic game.
matthewpiv
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:17 pm
Gender: Male

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by matthewpiv »

I dont know why you are complaining. I have attacked Blue several times in order to break up this bonues. I cant attack both of you every turn.....I think some people get way to sensitive about this and jump to conclusions way to quickly
lurp
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by lurp »

wy hasn't green ever attacked you for attacking him ever
matthewpiv
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:17 pm
Gender: Male

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by matthewpiv »

I cant speak for him. All I can do is speak for myself. our borders are pretty much stalemated right now, so i cant attack him every turn....I had to wait til I had a trade in to be able to. But anyone can look at the game log and see that I have attacked green many times and we have no border agreement.
Jeffire
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:09 pm

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by Jeffire »

Is it hard for you to understand common sense lurp? Simply put, if you have over 70 armies and Matthew and I were sitting around 30 each, it doesn't take Napoleon to understand there's a disproportionate amount of strength for one player. Plus I did eliminate Green last turn so I think that sort of eliminates any possibility of a secret alliance.

Frankly, my dear is right; if you somehow manage to lose you're horrible
lurp
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by lurp »

blah blah blah
User avatar
Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 8462
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: matthewpiv , jeffire

Post by Evil Semp »

I don't see any secret diplomacy, they both attacked each other through out the game. Some times three players games can look like there is teaming up against someone but that is usually the two weakest going against the strongest. matthewpiv and jeffire are CLEARED of secret diplomacy.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”