Page 39 of 89
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:19 pm
by qeee1
The circles don't need to be obvious their point is to help see the army numbers... I think they're fine as they are.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:22 pm
by fluffybunnykins
I'd agree with that, qeee, the LESS you can see the circles, the better
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:57 pm
by Wisse
qwert wrote:Ok maybe im crazy, but if these map not finish and good for play then i realy must reconsider my work in these map.
I upload all MAYOR PROBLEMS AND MISTAKE, who request MAYORITY of CC, and i say that these map comlete good for play.
Now andy its you turn to fight agains MAYORITY of CC, and agree with MAYORITY, or juse yours right of BIG BOSS of map foundry and crush these map from CC. Waithing your final decision.
andy is owned?

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:11 pm
by TMG26
the map is fine like it is now...
the circles doesn't matter... the important is see the number of armies and not the circle...
keep the map as it is now... There are worse maps in cc...
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:12 pm
by Serbia
Personally I think the circles aren't a huge issue, as long as the numbers show up.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:28 pm
by Samus
qeee1 wrote:The circles don't need to be obvious their point is to help see the army numbers... I think they're fine as they are.
Agreed. The circles are not a part of the aesthetics of the map, the less you can see them while still functioning to show the armies the better.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:41 pm
by Qwert
The army shadow i repeat equal transparency and all army number can see perfect with no problem, and borders also good and been changes to these now, becouse mayority ask, and look good, and i will not change these.
1.Army shadows(aproval from mayority-andy look my all topic if you dont belive)
2.Borders(aproval from mayority-andy look my all topic if you dont belive)
These problems finish and i will not change nothing, these my final decision.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:48 pm
by Ruben Cassar
If you stick with these army shadows it's fine for me. I just pointed out that personally in my opinion if there is something to perfect it's those and not the borders. But as I have told you I have no problem with them remaining as they are.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:11 pm
by AndyDufresne
I agree with Qeee and Samus and the others about the army shadows.
And Qwert, I'm not even talking about the size of the lines or borders, simply the 'choppiness' and the 'rough' feeling. Perhaps if you played with a blur tool that would eliminate the jagged feel.
--Andy
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:14 pm
by Qwert
Andy i dont understand yours final decision, and even ignore what i wrote for Mayority decision, i say that i will not change nothing and you say....?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:24 pm
by RobinJ
Okay - possibly tweak the borders a bit as has been suggested but just get the map out asap after that! If any more improvements need to be made, just update it later. For now, all I want to do is play the goddamned map!
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:27 pm
by Qwert
Soory but i will not change something what pass before in topic, and these my final.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:31 pm
by KEYOGI
Well... again it seems that you are making the final decision yourself, not anyone else. You have so much support for this map, it is a shame you wont spend a couple of minutes to fix some minor visual problems.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:34 pm
by Qwert
No these not minor visual problem, i dont change somethin what MAJORITY aprove, and Andy want to prove that hes a boss and that other people opinion not worth nothing, becouse i repeat again these finish when MaJORITY aprove not andy, or maybe he want to change rules. If these map not be for play then people can blame Andy for these problem not me.
Andy repeat every time"Here Maps Make MAJORITY not 1 man"but now he want to change these rule.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:38 pm
by AK_iceman
Whats a "MAYORITY"?

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:53 pm
by Spockers
qwert, I get spam emails from west africa that are easier to read than your posts.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:55 pm
by Qwert
Soory my mistake i mean to say majority im a litle angry.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:57 pm
by Qwert
Anger spocker, when i angry then i write bad english, but i belive that majority understand what i want to say.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:23 pm
by Ruben Cassar
AK_iceman wrote:Whats a "MAYORITY"?

When a mayor gets the majority! Everyone knows that!

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:25 pm
by Ruben Cassar
Okay I suggest putting a poll on the borders issue maybe we finally get to a decision about this map and see what the majority really want. I am sure Qwert will agree to refine the borders if the majority vote for that option.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:38 pm
by Qwert
Ruben, these isue all ready been in topic and why only i must put something again in topic, whit these map nothing bad, and i will definitly dont put these again. This my final decision no more work, and if these mean end of these map then send message to andy becouse only he want to create mutiny agains my map, and only he will be gyilty if these map not be for play, and i will definitly leave map fondry if he again ignoring and dont want to say hes final decision.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:08 pm
by AndyDufresne
Qwert, I've no personal vendetta against you. If I did qwert, I simply could inactivate your account or ban you from the forum. But you are still around.

And so are your maps. The border issue is a minor thing, but it improves the map quality. I don't think I'd be doing my job if I lowered the standards just for you. I think a simple blur would ease the pixely jaggedness, which would take at max, 10 minutes to do.
--Andy
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:19 pm
by AK_iceman
Hey qwert, how about a new poll to see if you should fix the borders like Andy requested?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:23 pm
by Ruben Cassar
AK_iceman wrote:Hey qwert, how about a new poll to see if you should fix the borders like Andy requested?
I already told him to do that and he declined the offer. Seems like another cul de sac for this map...
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:25 pm
by KEYOGI
Polls aren't the solution to all problems.