Page 39 of 65
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:17 pm
by mandyb
Neoteny wrote:No, I think he's dead. It seems both our doc and our mayor got killed by the same person. I read awhile back something about a couple of bullets. What ever happened with that?
A few fellow pilots said that thy only saw a vauge image of a reptile with a red crownlike horn on his head reflecting in their computer screens.
The second killer was walking towards the patiant. It was a human. Then Chakwas got shot in the back of the head.
doesn't this mean there are two separate killers as opposed to one?
Any ideas of who we should protect? Now that the doc has gone who else do we know about that needs protection - suika maybe?
As for who to lynch - was anyone able to glean any further info?
Also
You will have around 12 days minimum and 14 day's maximum.
what's this mean?
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:19 pm
by william18
mandyb wrote:You will have around 12 days minimum and 14 day's maximum.
what's this mean?
Thats your time limit before your deadline.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:23 pm
by Neoteny
william18 wrote:Captian Anderson ( / ) was checking he ships interior systems control board. As he was examining the screen, he got shot in the head from behind with a pistol. A few fellow pilots said that thy only saw a vauge image of a reptile with a red crownlike horn on his head reflecting in their computer screens.
The second killer was walking towards the patiant. It was a human. Then Chakwas got shot in the back of the head ... The patiant said the he/she matched the description of Captian Andersons killer.
I really have no idea. Maybe the first attacker matched Anderson's killer?
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:27 pm
by william18
Take your time guy's and start to ask question. Each murder has a clue that you must find. You have over a week so don't rush. Make sure you use all this talking time wisely and communicate as much as possible.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:44 pm
by suggs
Ok guys. William pm'd me, and told me that SPURGISTAN killed the captain (/).
So, maybe i am being hasty, but i see no reason not to lynch spurgistan, as / was town.
So:
VOTE SPURGISTAN.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:46 pm
by Neoteny
suggs wrote:Ok guys. William pm'd me, and told me that SPURGISTAN killed the captain (/).
So, maybe i am being hasty, but i see no reason not to lynch spurgistan, as / was town.
So:
VOTE SPURGISTAN.
Lol right after telling us to calm down. Any word on brown?
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:47 pm
by suggs
No, i didnt target brown.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:51 pm
by baggins994
william18 wrote:The second killer was walking towards the patiant. It was a human. Then Chakwas got shot in the back of the head. The attacker fleed to avoid confrontation. The patiant said the he/she matched the description of Captian Andersons killer.
Here's my theory on this section.
william18 wrote:The second killer was walking towards the patiant.
I think this part means there were definately 2 separate killers.
william18 wrote:The patiant said the he/she matched the description of Captian Andersons killer.
I think this part means that the second killer was the same creature as the first which probably means he's the same group too. (As opposed to vig or the other one of the 2 bad groups that the 1st killer was in.)
Its all just theory though.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:56 pm
by william18
/ will you be a replacement? Im almost certain that you will be needed.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:09 pm
by suggs
baggins994 wrote:william18 wrote:The second killer was walking towards the patiant. It was a human. Then Chakwas got shot in the back of the head. The attacker fleed to avoid confrontation. The patiant said the he/she matched the description of Captian Andersons killer.
Here's my theory on this section.
william18 wrote:The second killer was walking towards the patiant.
I think this part means there were definately 2 separate killers.
william18 wrote:The patiant said the he/she matched the description of Captian Andersons killer.
I think this part means that the second killer was the same creature as the first which probably means he's the same group too. (As opposed to vig or the other one of the 2 bad groups that the 1st killer was in.)
Its all just theory though.
That all sounds cool.
But lets lynch spurgistan first, and ask questions later.
Hes either a bandit or scum-and who cares which. he aint town, he killed town, and therefore town are gonna kill him, right.
*hopes for roar of approval*
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:14 pm
by Neoteny
I'll at least put a little pressure on. vote: spurgistan
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:19 pm
by KiwiTaker
Mod could I get the result from my acton last night?
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:43 pm
by suggs
anyone not automatically voting SPURGISTAN i find a bit scummy or banidtry.
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:22 pm
by timmytuttut88
im confused, someone sum up the night time phase
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:04 am
by mandyb
unvote vote spurgistan
seems he has some explaining to do
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:06 am
by Suika
vote Spurgistan
I'll reveal the full list later, because I've got to go to work, but Spurgistan was in contact with both of our dead last night. Highly suspicious.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:19 am
by suggs
Suika wrote:vote Spurgistan
I'll reveal the full list later, because I've got to go to work, but Spurgistan was in contact with both of our dead last night. Highly suspicious.
Yes. I targeted /, and found he was killed by Spurgistan-so a bit suspicious.
Lets lynch him already

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:48 am
by Kernal_Kronic
Hey well that's good enough reason for me
vote spurgistan
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:08 am
by Kernal_Kronic
Well we should definately protect either suggs/Suika and if there are any backup doc's they should then protect the other.
Are there 3 atackers or 2 from the doc's death? The way i see it 1st someone tried to kill the person Brown was protecting. Then there was a 2nd attacker (a human) also going for the patient but got scared away when a 3rd attacker killed brown or did the 2nd attacker kill brown from behind?
Alot of people are getting shot from behind. Would that be the vigilante/SK or both?
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:35 am
by Suika
Right, the full list of last night's corpse investigations.
Browng-08 was visited by Timmytuttut88, lalaland and Spurgistan, while / was visited by Militant, Snorri1234 and Spurigstan.
Whether than means 3 attackers, or just 3 visitors (remember that this list doesn't include any Geth players...probably), I can't say.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:48 am
by suggs
I'm going on memory, so could well be wrong, but wasnt Lalaland implicated in one of the killings earlier?
Still, we be mad not to lynch spurgistan, as he defintely kiled one of them (/) and quite possibly Brown too.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:58 am
by kalishnikov
You know FOR SURE it was spurg that did the kill last night? We don't have much margin of error left in this game. If you say 'yes, I'm sure it was him' he'll get my vote but at the same time we really shouldn't speed lynch anyone today.
Vote: protect Suika Right now the most valuable role in the game, in my opinion.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:53 am
by mandyb
Suika has given us 5 names to work with. At the moment spurgistan is the most suspect having visited both dead town and killed one of them.
My vote stands for spurgistan and I think suika and suggs both merit protecting. It appears suika knows the movements but suggs knows the actions - which is the more important?
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:53 pm
by suggs
kalishnikov wrote:You know FOR SURE it was spurg that did the kill last night? We don't have much margin of error left in this game. If you say 'yes, I'm sure it was him' he'll get my vote but at the same time we really shouldn't speed lynch anyone today.
Vote: protect Suika Right now the most valuable role in the game, in my opinion.
Yep, it is definite. Spurgistan killed /.
Got a PM saying (obviosly i cant quote it, so reaarange this sentence!):
Killed by Surgistan, / was.
The real problem with my role, is that if i target someone who doesn't get killed, my role is useless.
We may well be better off with suika.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:01 pm
by spurgistan
Right on. I would have claimed after that rather awful night, but I had some supicions about Suggs, just wanted to be sure he could nail me to the wall. Anyways, yes, last night I followed up on some massively wrong reads and vigged browng and / (although the scene does make me believe that somebody else may have killed one of them). However, killing townies does not make you anti-town. If you want to lynch me for making silly underinformed vig-kills in the endgame, that is definitely an acceptable strat. Anyways, I am Urdnot Wrex, a Krogan Mercenary, and I am a townie.