Page 36 of 80

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:47 pm
by IcePack
ViperOverLord wrote:
IcePack wrote:Ok, ranking is updated and will be posted in the Dispatch!

Also, I included the war update and included a shortcut to the last four weeks worth of wars, so you dont have to scroll for ages...

IcePack


I don't see the last 4 weeks of wars.


Bottom of the OP

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:17 am
by benga
TFFS OSA 19.5 17.5 06/09/13


how did you come up with this?

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:58 pm
by mcshanester29
VVV vs SOH - 28-13 - SOH wins

Last game: Game 12773025 - ended 6/23

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:39 pm
by Qwert
mcshanester29 wrote:VVV vs SOH - 13-28 - SOH wins

Last game: Game 12773025 - ended 6/23


fixed

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:32 pm
by kuma32478
AQoH - 21
UM8 - 20

Last Game - Game 12769066

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:03 pm
by Genoke
FISO vs Atlantis: 11 - 30
last Game 12770037 will be a win for FISO.

clan war thread:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=441&t=190050

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15...Dispatch Update]

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:11 pm
by IcePack
The next update will be over the weekend. This issue will NOT be featured in the Dispatch, due to time restrictions for the Dispatch.

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:37 pm
by kuma32478
AQoH - 21
HH - 20

Last Game 12722292

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:30 pm
by IcePack
Started to update this. Almost all results compiled...I know qwert might have some late additions, so this will wait a little longer. But, getting closer just FYI in case others have late finishing wars let me know ASAP.

IcePack

So far....
RA VDLL 13 3 06/01/13
FOED DYN 9 7 06/02/13
TNC HH 29 14 06/03/13
AQOH VVV 29 12 06/03/13
WAR RET 7 5 06/03/13
TNC PACK 22 19 06/04/13
TOFU TFFS 6 6 06/04/13
TFFS MM 9 7 06/05/13
PIG G1 8 4 06/05/13
FISO LOTZ 28 21 06/06/13
FALL LOW 8 4 06/06/13
MYTH LOTZ 10 6 06/07/13
SOH DYN 10 2 06/07/13
OTP IA 9 7 06/09/13
TFFS OSA 19.5 17.5 06/09/13
RET DYN 7 5 06/09/13
FALL MB 9 3 06/09/13
TNC HH 9 3 06/10/13
FOED TNC 8 4 06/10/13
LOW MD 7 5 06/11/13
TOFU LEG 12 4 06/13/13
WAR SOH 10 2 06/13/13
TOFU FOED 8 4 06/14/13
FALL VDLL 11 5 06/16/13
LEG MB 31 10 06/17/13
TFFS YNWA 31 10 06/20/13
FALL TSM 24 19 06/21/13
HH RS 25 16 06/23/13
SOH VVV 28 13 06/23/13
AQOH UM8 21 20 06/24/13
LHDD TLW 36 19 06/25/13
KORT OSA 13 3 06/25/13
ATL FISO 30 11 06/26/13
TNC FISO 33 12 06/27/13
AQOH HH 21 20 06/28/13
MD YNWA 53 14 06/28/13

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 6:03 pm
by Qwert
not really, i see that you add two last update matches from CL5.

Only left two matches, and first phase will be completed, but i think that this will be finished for next update.


edit: icepack, are you sure that your results are correct, i just notice that MYTH -LOTZ you listed like 10-6,, but real score are 14-2?

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:04 pm
by IcePack
qwert wrote:edit: icepack, are you sure that your results are correct, i just notice that MYTH -LOTZ you listed like 10-6,, but real score are 14-2?


not sure, i post what you give me. could have been an error on either, it was last update that the info was there but i already got rid of the copy paste from your list into mine, so the score is just left. i suppose i could have entered it wrong, but usually i just copy and paste what youve written in the other thread.

either way, easy correction for me to make. ill be sure it goes out correct this update. Thanks for catching it.

IcePack

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:37 pm
by Gilligan
PIG-G1 was included last update

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 12:39 am
by IcePack
Gilligan wrote:PIG-G1 was included last update


I posted the last 4 weeks

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:08 pm
by IcePack
Updated.

Re: F400 Ranking [June 15 Update]

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:10 pm
by Gilligan
IcePack wrote:
Gilligan wrote:PIG-G1 was included last update


I posted the last 4 weeks


Oh okay :)

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 11:13 pm
by Chariot of Fire
Nice job Ice, thanks mate :)

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:23 am
by Genoke
If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:34 am
by Leehar
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:46 am
by Bruceswar
Leehar wrote:
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.



No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:40 am
by IcePack
Bruceswar wrote:
Leehar wrote:
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.



No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.


Bruceswar is correct. N/A means no win in last 12 months

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:59 am
by Leehar
IcePack wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Leehar wrote:
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.



No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.


Bruceswar is correct. N/A means no win in last 12 months

Ah sorry, I misread him as asking about the 1 year rank (which is a - now but was N/A in May 15 ranking)

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:05 am
by IcePack
Archive

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:52 am
by Genoke
IcePack wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Leehar wrote:
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.



No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.


Bruceswar is correct. N/A means no win in last 12 months

ok, thanks for explanation guys... to bad there are so many N/A's... :?
8/42, almost 20% didn't win a clan war in the passed 1 year :shock: ...

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:07 am
by chapcrap
How long before KOA leaves the F400?

Re: F400 Ranking [July 1 Update]

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2013 12:16 pm
by MudPuppy
Genoke wrote:
IcePack wrote:
Bruceswar wrote:
Leehar wrote:
Genoke wrote:If a clan has N/A behind its name, under category "best showing in 1 year", does that mean the clan couldn't win a clan war during the whole that have passed?

It just means in the last year they haven't played enough wars to get a ranking because the weighting is too low.

No that means that they have not beat anybody in the last year in a war.

Bruceswar is correct. N/A means no win in last 12 months

ok, thanks for explanation guys... to bad there are so many N/A's... :?
8/42, almost 20% didn't win a clan war in the passed 1 year :shock: ...

That doesn't look right. What about Risk Attackers, for instance? They haven't won a full war but have won a bunch of mini wars and seem to have enough activity (123-138 overall) to warrant some kind of 'showing' for their efforts? Does the #27 clan get no credit for their 15-15 tie against the #13 clan for "Best Showing in 1 Year" purposes?

RA DB 10 2 07/06/12
RA MM 6 6 07/06/12
RA z-IGNI 7 5 07/06/12
RA LOTZ 6 6 07/06/12
RA MB 10 2 07/06/12
SOH RA 9 3 07/06/12
PACK RA 34 7 07/14/12
SOH RA 10 8 08/08/12
z-IGNI RA 9 9 08/15/12
MM RA 9 9 08/31/12
PIG RA 15 15 03/29/13
FALL RA 12 4 05/08/13
RA AOK 10 6 05/18/13
LOW RA 10 6 05/31/13
RA VDLL 13 3 06/01/13