The Evolutionary Tournament [Winner: Funkelee]
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 13 Feb 09)
Some very interesting tournament trivia I just noticed:
Gilligan made it all the way to the finals of Bracket A before losing.
In doing so, he defeated The Cheat (his current opponent in the semis of Bracket B), Funkelee (another semifinalist) and Mustapha Mond (a quarterfinalist currently playing for the final semifinal spot).
As well, The Cheat (mentioned previously) defeated psychobkrazy, the other "live" quarterfinalist).
So of the five spots still living in Bracket B, none of them have lost to anyone but each other!
Apparently, that was an extremely strong Bracket A section! Yikes!
Gilligan made it all the way to the finals of Bracket A before losing.
In doing so, he defeated The Cheat (his current opponent in the semis of Bracket B), Funkelee (another semifinalist) and Mustapha Mond (a quarterfinalist currently playing for the final semifinal spot).
As well, The Cheat (mentioned previously) defeated psychobkrazy, the other "live" quarterfinalist).
So of the five spots still living in Bracket B, none of them have lost to anyone but each other!
Apparently, that was an extremely strong Bracket A section! Yikes!
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 15 Feb 09)
And I belive Mustapha has the current pearl harbor in the bag.....psycho has 1 army on one ship....over next round
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 11 Feb 09)
GeneralAnestetic wrote:the most unbalanced start ever:
game 4241517
sure, go first with a 5-army bonus...
that's fair
Holy frickin hell batman....no kidding that was an amazingly bad drop for you GA.
- BrotherWolf
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:55 am
- Location: Herefordshire
- Contact:
- GeneralAnestetic
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:50 pm
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 21 Feb 09)
the bracketing for this tournament makes no sense at all.
there's a guy who's played 10 matches & a guy who's played 3 and both are still active.
won't play this style again.
there's a guy who's played 10 matches & a guy who's played 3 and both are still active.
won't play this style again.
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 21 Feb 09)
GeneralAnestetic wrote:the bracketing for this tournament makes no sense at all.
there's a guy who's played 10 matches & a guy who's played 3 and both are still active.
won't play this style again.
GeneralAnestetic, I've already explained this to you once (when you were complaining about it earlier in the thread). It actually makes PERFECT SENSE, you're simply not looking at it in a logical manner. It all has to do with the fact that this is a TRIPLE-ELIMINATION TOURNAMENT. Allow me to explain (again), concerning your current complaint:
The three-game player lost his first two matches of the tournament (one in Bracket A and one in Bracket B). That dropped him to Bracket C, where he won his first match AND HE'S STILL WAITING FOR HIS NEXT MATCH (who happens to be the loser of the Championship Round...meaning he's going to be forced to face one of the two players who have proven to be the strongest...that isn't exactly an advantage for him, you certainly should realize. Meanwhile, Gilligan has dominating the tournament, moving to the finals of BOTH Bracket A and Bracket B before losing in each (sorry, Gilligan <smile>). THAT explains why he has so many more games than Ode to Veeck.
This is really quite a simple manner. Rather than whining, why not ask for an explanation? It's really QUITE simple.
- GeneralAnestetic
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:50 pm
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 21 Feb 09)
a) it's not whining.
2) the structure doesn't make sense because it doesn't reward success. a player who wins ten matches could lose out to a player who's only won 1 prior match. i'm all for triple elimination, but not in a format that is unbalanced.
2) the structure doesn't make sense because it doesn't reward success. a player who wins ten matches could lose out to a player who's only won 1 prior match. i'm all for triple elimination, but not in a format that is unbalanced.
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 21 Feb 09)
GeneralAnestetic wrote:a) it's not whining.
2) the structure doesn't make sense because it doesn't reward success. a player who wins ten matches could lose out to a player who's only won 1 prior match. i'm all for triple elimination, but not in a format that is unbalanced.
My structure definitely does make sense and it DOES reward success, just not to the degree that you would prefer. That's where the byes into the second and third rounds of Bracket B and Bracket C come into play...those positions are earned by play in the previous bracket (or brackets, in the case of Bracket C).
As I explained in the opening post of my tournament, this format is precisely what is used in high school and college wrestling.
However, I do recognize a bit of what you're saying which is why in my second tournament (already underway), I also have a premium prize for the one non-tourney-winning player who ends up with the highest winning percentage in the tournament, as well. So the individual with the most wins will still get something, even if they blow it in Bracket C or in the Championship Bracket. In this current tournament, even though I don't have that, it appears likely that Gilligan would end up with that moniker...although there are a couple of other possibilities if Gilligan should "hiccup" here in the next game or so.
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 23 Feb 09)
Sooo.....what if someone were to play to the end of a bracket, lose, start over, play to end of next and lose, then play up from bottom again and win out. Would they not most likely have the winningest percentage, and have one the whole thing, therby getting two years of premium(in your Evo tourney II)? Or would that not be possible?
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 23 Feb 09)
Funkelee wrote:Sooo.....what if someone were to play to the end of a bracket, lose, start over, play to end of next and lose, then play up from bottom again and win out. Would they not most likely have the winningest percentage, and have one the whole thing, therby getting two years of premium(in your Evo tourney II)? Or would that not be possible?
Good question! No...my "best winning percentage" goes to the best winning percentage not counting the tournament winner (I outlined it in the rules, because it made some sense that the tourney winner could well be the best winning percentage also).
Also, the percentage-winner doesn't get a full year, only a partial year.
I've started to wish I had done that with this tournament, since Gilligan has essentially done what you described above (except for winning it all, which is still in question).
And he probably hates that we keep talking about it. <laughing out loud>
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 25 Feb 09)
Winning percentage would be really nice right now.

Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 25 Feb 09)
Gilligan wrote::lol:![]()
![]()
Winning percentage would be really nice right now.
But Gilligan, you're doing so well in my other tournament that...oh, wait...never mind. <evil smile>
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 28 Feb 09)
Funkelee has advanced to the CHAMPIONSHIP MATCH against whoever comes through Bracket C. Congrats, Funk!
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 1 Mar 09)
Gilligan wrote:And Gilligan makes it to the finals yet again
Now let's see if you can do something with it! <laughing>
Though you've got a bit of a wait...three matches to go in the other half of the bracket.
Re: The Evolutionary Tournament (Updated 1 Mar 09)
Funkelee has won the championship match and will be awarded the ONE-YEAR PREMIUM PRIZE
as well as the illustrious (but still in production...should be available shortly) first-ever
awarded EVOLUTIONARY TOURNAMENT MEDALLION!
Congratulations Funkelee!
as well as the illustrious (but still in production...should be available shortly) first-ever
awarded EVOLUTIONARY TOURNAMENT MEDALLION!
Congratulations Funkelee!